Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so significantly more come in via plane and did prior to the whole Boat people thing.

yet significantly more of the one that arrive via boats are found to be genuine cases of asylum seekers.

oh and the boats have not stopped...there is just a new policy of refusing the media any information on it so you don't know the boats have arrived...

this

All these reduce significantly when they get the hint that Australia isn't the place to sail to

this isn't going to happen.

Actually they have been shown to conduct themselves horribly to get rescued.

Aside from that why is it hamish they have no other way to get here? It's undisputed they spend thousands, tens of thousands to get here via this risky way so you tell me why don't they just get on a plane and come here like everyone else who is legitimately able to? Because they shouldn't be here that's why.

Why destroy documentation? We don't want disease and welfare drains on our society. There's a right and a wrong way to do things, boat people are wrong.

It costs more to come by plane, not only that but planes are where the majority of your "economic refugees" come from. There are also far more people arriving by plane than people in boats, they just don't look as salacious when splattered across a PR campaign so the gov't doens't bang on about it.

"tens of thousands" is a maximum figure and is not representative of what all people pay. The people that arrived on the only boat to hit Australian shores last year (yes, it happened) paid ~$1000 a head

It also affords greater security as a nation to be discriminant about who enters our country, which is a key issue for me.

Are you saying we will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come?

  • Like 1

Are you saying we will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come?

Pretty sure that doesn't work lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Australia_policy

this isn't going to happen.

Whether it happens or not is a better scenario than the message that the alternative will deliver when you open the floodgates - give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses etc,

Are you saying we will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come?

A basic right of national security, you would think. But Hamish wants to give these people the power to vote for the greens.

  • Like 2

It costs more to come by plane, not only that but planes are where the majority of your "economic refugees" come from. There are also far more people arriving by plane than people in boats, they just don't look as salacious when splattered across a PR campaign so the gov't doens't bang on about it.

"tens of thousands" is a maximum figure and is not representative of what all people pay. The people that arrived on the only boat to hit Australian shores last year (yes, it happened) paid ~$1000 a head

Even $1000 for an unsuccessful attempt is a lot of money and still does not explain why they don't go through legitimate channels

You've also ignored the point of why they destroy all documentation??

Even $1000 for an unsuccessful attempt is a lot of money and still does not explain why they don't go through legitimate channels

You've also ignored the point of why they destroy all documentation??

Some of them do that... some.

Most of them cant afford legitimate channels or are unable due to the persecution they are fleeing... that's why they are called assylum seekers

A basic right of national security, you would think. But Hamish wants to give these people the power to vote for the greens.

Even if every asylum seeker that came via boat was allowed to vote and they all voted green, it still wouldn't touch the side of the ALP/LNP vote

did lol recently when someone told me how much it cost to obtain acid, extacy, mushrooms, etc. immediately though WTF why bother drinking?

Because it's legal and small quantities won't cause you to crash your car into a house because you thought it was a gateway into another dimension

Drugs have always been cheaper for thrills per hour vs cost

Weed was a $20 affair when I was in high school, that would last you all night while mates pissed away $50 on premixers

Even if every asylum seeker that came via boat was allowed to vote and they all voted green, it still wouldn't touch the side of the ALP/LNP vote

One less green voter in Australia is one less fk wit idealist that I have to encounter

Because it's legal and small quantities won't cause you to crash your car into a house because you thought it was a gateway into another dimension

now where's the fun in that

One less green voter in Australia is one less fk wit idealist that I have to encounter

yeah... those gad damn idealists...

Whether it happens or not is a better scenario than the message that the alternative will deliver when you open the floodgates - give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses etc,

I find that hard to believe. Turning a boat away is a one off cost.

All these reduce significantly when they get the hint that Australia isn't the place to sail to

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...