Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

which car doesn't have aero in Pro class Roy?

There's aero, and there there is AERO.

:thumbsup:

Hopefully not something ugly as sin with aero.

As impressive as they are for the design, commitment and spend I find some of the extreme cars horrible to look at. Which is fine, I don't own them and they are designed to go uber fast, not be pretty.

I would personal;y sacrifice a bit of speed to have a car that is more "garage jewellery" spec :)

But I am curious how much of the extreme stuff is functional aero, we are not talking about Pikes Peaks cars which need uber downforce due to low friction surface and generally average speed less then 130km/h. Someone was telling me a car generates 1000kg of downforce! I cant see that being right, as thats more than an F1 car! So I think some numbers get thrown around and people dont stop to consider the merits of the claims.

  • Replies 742
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah I much prefer the modest aero compared to the hammerhead, 7m long silvias and batmobiles.

Cyber evo and sierra have showed that you don't need stupid protruding aero to win. Subtlety and discrete clever unseen aero mods are way cooler and still keep the cars looking tough. Cyber this year looks hideous but what can you expect from C-west. Voltex are very clever in my books. Just look around the car parks at track days and you'll see every frieken evo has a voltex wing, voltex canards, voltex front lip, voltex roof wings etc. Their products are functional but not detracting away from the original car. How many snow ploughs are c-west gunna sell after WTAC??? lol

Yeah I much prefer the modest aero compared to the hammerhead, 7m long silvias and batmobiles.

Cyber evo and sierra have showed that you don't need stupid protruding aero to win. Subtlety and discrete clever unseen aero mods are way cooler and still keep the cars looking tough. Cyber this year looks hideous but what can you expect from C-west.

this!

some of the cars still manage to make Cyber Evo look very conservative even with their horrible new hammerhead/snowplough...

article_nemo3.png

article_nemo2.png

they'll look pretty stupid if they don't win...

Edited by hrd-hr30

That's just plain ugly, no matter how quick it is I'd never want to own/drive it!

Happy for my car to be slower but still look normal.

Reality is you'll never compete with these guys anyway so why hack the shit out of your car trying....??

they'll look pretty stupid if they don't win...

The car has probably had 95% of its life being built and only 5% being driven and dialled in. So I dont think they will look silly if they don't win. Sure they could fall from the sky and be the quickest and win it or they could do an amazing job and be 1-3seconds off a very fast pace...no crime in that. Good on them for putting their money behind their ideas and concepts but.....like you its just not for me.

I think the NEMO EVO is one of the cars that I read was designed by Andrew Brilliant and claims 1,000kg of downforce :( That is amount for a tin top if realised!

I just hope the incredible spend doesnt stop the car from being developed and races in months/years to come. Its a shame that none of the R35s that ran in Pro last year are racing again this year

Personally I am rooting for the lil GT3 Exige. I understand it actually has some hp now so hopefully fly the rwd flag in Pro class along with the UAS HMAS ZED :)

do you think the car will be competitive against the overseas teams by August?

Our advantage is having people from the V8supercar background data acquisition.

She has gone above and beyond, most forms of motorsport, in regards to data acquisition. We are monitoring and logging everything we can. We even have incorporated Aero data acquisition, just for Andrew.

I know he is smiling when I say that, but so are Leigh and James in regard to Suspension data and also Nick in regard to engine data acquisition. We are not going to leave any stone unturned. We would, like everyone, like more testing time on the car, but with the adjustability of the design and the data acquisition capabilities, we believe we have a good plan that we are confident can deliver on

Having seen SSE, Cyber Evo and HKS Evo, they were all great cars created on either suspension, chassis design, weight, engine horsepower and aero, or a combination of a couple of them, but not a culmination of all of them, they took parts of each to create a great car. We wanted to achieve more, that has been our goal, to be at the forefront on each and everyone one of those areas.

big call to say all those top cars are lacking in at least a couple of major areas! and that their car has it all covered...

Edited by hrd-hr30

Top Fuel and Voltex have a good chance this year, surely.

Light as fark, low center of gravity, mega power and sensible aero.

Same principle to the Exige crew I suppose.

PS. Booked my trailer for the event. It's getting close now!

i wish this format was more fun to watch

been there twice and each year i am pretty sure i see each car out there for 2 laps total on the main day

thank god there is cool shit to look at and drool over in the pits because from a druncan spectators point of view its shit racing

Cyber evo and sierra have showed that you don't need stupid protruding aero to win.

Yet...

That might change in the coming years. I think it'll be interesting to see how this years cars go with some of the more "out there" stuff in the builds.

Cyber this year looks hideous but what can you expect from C-west. Their products are functional but not detracting away from the original car. How many snow ploughs are c-west gunna sell after WTAC??? lol

I LOL'd :thumbsup:

i wish this format was more fun to watch

been there twice and each year i am pretty sure i see each car out there for 2 laps total on the main day

thank god there is cool shit to look at and drool over in the pits because from a druncan spectators point of view its shit racing

I'm with you fatz.

It is shit from a spectators viewpoint and in the end that may hurt the event.

I actually reckon they should use a control tyre, like a slick used in V8supertaxis, so you can go out and do multiple laps without worrying about overheating/overusing your tyres. It should be like the V8 qualifying sessions, hectic as all shit with plenty of cars and plenty of laps.

Now that'd be good to watch. Something needs to be done!!

It'll also level the playing field for normal people who don't have a $10,000 tyre budget for the weekend.

Edited by bri73y

I'm with you fatz.

It is shit from a spectators viewpoint and in the end that may hurt the event.

I actually reckon they should use a control tyre, like a slick used in V8supertaxis, so you can go out and do multiple laps without worrying about overheating/overusing your tyres. It should be like the V8 qualifying sessions, hectic as all shit with plenty of cars and plenty of laps.

Now that'd be good to watch. Something needs to be done!!

It'll also level the playing field for normal people who don't have a $10,000 tyre budget for the weekend.

yup 10000000% agree

Crap so you want me to return $9000 worth of tires I just had delivered for your GTR brighty....

I'm with you fatz.

It is shit from a spectators viewpoint and in the end that may hurt the event.

I actually reckon they should use a control tyre, like a slick used in V8supertaxis, so you can go out and do multiple laps without worrying about overheating/overusing your tyres. It should be like the V8 qualifying sessions, hectic as all shit with plenty of cars and plenty of laps.

Now that'd be good to watch. Something needs to be done!!

It'll also level the playing field for normal people who don't have a $10,000 tyre budget for the weekend.

Competitors cannot be blamed for having ugly or extensively developed aero packages, the problem is fundamental to the regulations. designers and builders would be remiss to not attempt to eek every possible advantage.

However I always thought time attack was more of a production based event, similar in many respects to Grp A and various touring car series around the world.

This isn't a stab at the event or organisers or the competitors, I went last year, loved it and I am going this year as well.

I'm with you fatz.

It is shit from a spectators viewpoint and in the end that may hurt the event.

I actually reckon they should use a control tyre, like a slick used in V8supertaxis, so you can go out and do multiple laps without worrying about overheating/overusing your tyres. It should be like the V8 qualifying sessions, hectic as all shit with plenty of cars and plenty of laps.

Now that'd be good to watch. Something needs to be done!!

It'll also level the playing field for normal people who don't have a $10,000 tyre budget for the weekend.

If they can do more than 2-3 laps without running out of fuel or spontaneously combusting!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...