Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

stretching is also used to stiffen the sidewalls on cheap tyres. drifting = many dead tyres and hence people tend to look at cheaper tyres.

just because you dont do it daoesn't mean it's only wank factor

Rubbish. Stretching doesn't stiffen sidewalls. It detracts from roadholding which enables drifters to loose grip (slide) with less power.

Wah?

That's a lot of stretching.

Unless something is wrong here:

9 in = 228.6 millimetres

so 225's on a 9in would give approx 3.6mm of stretch.

AKA nothing noticeable.

The tread of the tyre is roughly the same of width of the rim, so the sidewalls will be more or less right angled.

9.5 in = 241.3 millimetres

235's on a 9.5 would give 6.3mm stretch, which i believe would just start to get noticeable.

If i've got it wrong let me know.

Go look at a 235/45x17 on an 8" wide rim, and tell me if you think a 225 on a 9" would or wouldn't look stretched.

The advertised width of a tyre (225, 235 etc) is not an exact dimension that you can take to the bank. It's nominal, and in fact it changes depending on what width rim you stick it on.

Unless something is wrong here:

9 in = 228.6 millimetres

so 225's on a 9in would give approx 3.6mm of stretch.

AKA nothing noticeable.

The tread of the tyre is roughly the same of width of the rim, so the sidewalls will be more or less right angled.

9.5 in = 241.3 millimetres

235's on a 9.5 would give 6.3mm stretch, which i believe would just start to get noticeable.

If i've got it wrong let me know.

See attached photo. Tyre on the left is a 255 R comp. Tyre on the right is a 235 road tyre. Reckon there is 20mm difference????

For what it is worth the 235 looks underdone on a 9" tyre.

post-5134-0-65521900-1328487952_thumb.jpg

Unless something is wrong here:

9 in = 228.6 millimetres

so 225's on a 9in would give approx 3.6mm of stretch.

AKA nothing noticeable.

The tread of the tyre is roughly the same of width of the rim, so the sidewalls will be more or less right angled.

9.5 in = 241.3 millimetres

235's on a 9.5 would give 6.3mm stretch, which i believe would just start to get noticeable.

If i've got it wrong let me know.

Like said above, seems to work on paper, but not the way it works.

Can provide photos of a 235/45 on a 9.5, doesn't even sit on the wheel. The lip on both side stick out.

9" doesn't include the lip. It's the inner part of the rim i.e. the amount of tread on the ground.

255mm includes the lip, sidewall construction + the usable tread

why do you want to fit an incorrect tyre size on a given rim? years/months/weeks of engineering had gone into it and people fk it all up by mixing and matching the tyre size.

9" doesn't include the lip. It's the inner part of the rim i.e. the amount of tread on the ground.

255mm includes the lip, sidewall construction + the usable tread

why do you want to fit an incorrect tyre size on a given rim? years/months/weeks of engineering had gone into it and people fk it all up by mixing and matching the tyre size.

225 on a 10" wide rim.

no issues here

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The final part arrived today to un-clampify and simplify the intake Who would have though a 1/2" hose stainless bulkhead fitting designed for below waterline bilge pumps would be what I needed Test fit on a 3" offcut I had laying around to see if it would work, and it worked a treat All going well the intake will be on its "final version" tomorrow 
    • Good luck on the weekend mate
    • Must have been an absolute nightmare to drive when the power steer was out, the rack ratio/wheel size/caster is all set up for power assistance
    • Welcome to SAU, what are you looking at buying?
    • I checked the injectors again (1 and 2, since they’re easiest to access) to make sure they weren’t clogged. Even though the entire fuel system had been cleaned, I wanted to be certain. Everything looked clean, so I reinstalled and connected everything. When I started the car to confirm everything was okay, it immediately revved up high, so I shut it off straight away. I checked to see if I’d missed a vacuum hose or something, but everything was connected. On the second attempt, the car ran without the high idle, but I noticed a distinct “compressed air” sound coming from the engine bay. Tracing the sound, I pushed injector #6 forward slightly and the noise stopped — it turned out it wasn’t seated properly, despite the fuel rail being bolted down. While holding it in place, the car idled steadily without stalling and ran for over 5 minutes. At this point, I pulled all six injectors out just in case I hadn’t seated them correctly or dirt had gotten onto the O-rings. Unfortunately, I discovered that I had damaged 3 out of 6 injectors (the OEM 270cc ones) during installation. So yes, this was my fault. Since only the pintle caps were damaged, I’ve ordered a Fuel Injector Service Kit from NZEFI to refurbish them. In the meantime, I reinstalled my new injectors – the car now idles fine for over 15 minutes without stalling. I have not attempted to drive it so far. It’s not perfect yet, as it hesitates when the throttle is pressed, but it’s a big improvement. Unplugging the IACV with the new injectors idles at around 800rpm, even with the IACV screw tightened fully. But this is probably due to tune.
×
×
  • Create New...