Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Righto so i just got my R32 GTR back from the tuner

The car made 375rwkw at 18psi on pump fuel before the Fuel pump decided it couldnt flow anymore, that and the injectors are at 75% duty so they'll be swapped out as well..

and before everyone jumps in and tells me the nismo should flow more, i dont need to hear it. Yavuz tunes a certain way and its been working pretty well so far

Current set up is:

Borg warner 83/75 on a twin scroll manifold

Brand new Nismo intank pump that been wired to recieved the correct voltage, (so i know its pumping as much as it can)

Standard fuel rail and reg

Sard 800cc injectors

standard fuel lines

Now what i want to do is run the turbo at 25psi which will/should make in excess of 430rwkw on pump, BUT i will also be running an EFLEX tune with ethonol...

ive already got the ID 2000cc injectors on the way, and ive decided to get a twin entry fuel rail with an aftermaket reg, fuel lines will also be upgraded.

The decision that has to be made is what fuel pump set up to run, keeping in mind i will only be using the car for street duties mainly and light track days...do i:

1. Run a surge tank and have the nismo feeding two bosch 040's,

2. Sell the nismo and run twin intank 040's, or

3. Buy one of these big suckers and run a "Y" pipe so both sides for the rail can be fed

http://aeromotiveinc.com/products-page/fuel-pumps/11104-eliminator-fuel-pump/

problem with number 3 is that ive heard it doesnt flow as much as it claims

what do u guys reckon? if ive missed anything let me know

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396360-need-more-fuel/
Share on other sites

What ever you decide, don't buy an aeomotive pump...

My personal preffrence is a large single pump... whack a surge tank in if you'r looking at alot of track work- or not if you dont.

Keep it as simple as you can.

Cheers

Justin

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396360-need-more-fuel/#findComment-6295785
Share on other sites

Has anyone run a twin nismo intank setup before? I've heard of twin 044's so I imagine it's much the same yea?

I want to try and avoid the surge tank and obvioslusly I can get two Bosch pumps for the price of 1 nismo, I dont mind the noise of the 044's but obviously nismo is the preferred :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396360-need-more-fuel/#findComment-6296019
Share on other sites

What ever you decide, don't buy an aeomotive pump...

My personal preffrence is a large single pump... whack a surge tank in if you'r looking at alot of track work- or not if you dont.

Keep it as simple as you can.

Cheers

Justin

Simple is good, though I'm not really sure what else is out there in terms of big single intank pumps... Anyideas?

It'll need to flow well and truly more then a nismo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396360-need-more-fuel/#findComment-6296034
Share on other sites

Deatschwerks DW300? Solved my fueling problems and is as quiet as a mouse :ph34r:

http://www.deatschwerks.com/products/fuel-pumps/dw300-in-tank-fuel-pump

http://forums.evolutionm.net/automotosports-illinois/566110-bosch-044-aeromotive-stealth-340-deatschwerks-dw300-walbro-255lph-fuel-pump-test.html

I'm not sure if it will flow enough for 430rwkw though especially on ethanol... that is some serious mumbo!

Simple is good, though I'm not really sure what else is out there in terms of big single intank pumps... Anyideas?

It'll need to flow well and truly more then a nismo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396360-need-more-fuel/#findComment-6296188
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...