Jump to content
SAU Community

Tyre choice - fun vs practicality


slayer
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hiya, I am still deciding on what brand/type of tyre to fit to my R33 (which is stock at the moment), in a 255/40 on the rear and 235/45 on the front, but one question remains:

will I have less fun if I put a seriously grippy (and safe) tyre like the Bridgestone S03 on instead of some cheapie tyres?

I am not really interested in drifting, but I would like the ability to get a pretty serious rear end slide happening if I want, and maybe be able to fog it up a little at the lights.

I owned a WRX for 4 years and was afraid to pop the clutch or do any really violent launches for fear of breaking geabox/shafts etc (this one had about 180Kw at all wheels), so I am kinda looking forward to a car I can safely arc up without breaking stuff :)

If I go to a tyre like the S03, am I going to lose that ability? I get the impression these things are sooo damn grippy that I will need like 200rwKw to be able to break traction!

The S03 is my main pic for tyres at the moment (that or the P Zero Nero), but am I going about this all wrong and should I be going for something cheap and nasty so I can cut it up, like a Kuhmo Exta T712?

Any ideas?

Thanks

Conrad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Top end tyres have very soft compound. That's why they grip. However, they also wear out very quickly if you do burnouts and power slides as they were designed NOT to let cars get into these situations. If you want to smoke it up at the lights and slide around, hard compound tyres are the better option as they don't wear out as quickly as soft compound and also are cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a mates got kumho's on his 300zx and sometimes its fun, but other times just plain scary!! id be wanting to find a middle ground between these two. bald tyres can be ***n dangerous!!

also when racing you can always get the jump as he launches at 3000rpm and the back end is all over the place...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to have cheapies on the back of mine.

10% of the time they were fun.

90% of the time they were just plain frustrating.

One day I almost lost to a auto VN V6 because they tyres were that crap........:D :confused: :eek:

Got FM901's now. Much better.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got P zero Rossi 245.40.17 on 9ins rims at the back and I can break traction any time I like in 1st or 2nd. Just remember every day drives have to be usable in the wet too. I wouldn't put a hard compound on mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

go with grippy tyre as going through corners fast is better than sideways. or just weight till it rains.

i have really hard compound tyres on and there a bitch in the wet and a pain at the drags the spin to easy. yet i've got 60,000km out of them in two years and there still 1/4 above the wear maker on the tyres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks fellas, I think I will be going with the Bridgestone S03's, the Dunlop 901's were my original choice but I have heard they are pretty noisy (even compared to other performance tyres).

Bummer, cause they look awesome and the S03's look pretty damn dull.

Thanks

Conrad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you may see in another thread I have the Bridgestone S03's, sure they dont look spunk, but boy do they perform!! They are very insane.

I cant speak highly enough of these tyres, they grip better in the wet than they do in the dry, in the dry they stick like sh*t to a shovel, and in the wet, its like its on rails.

Through the mountains the car reacted like an AWD, and that was on both dry and wet roads, they are reasonably quiet tyres.. dont know how mileage will go, but they seem to be doing ok, I only drive her hard on the w/e.. and use the tyres for traction, not for smoke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just one thing to keep in mind, fun-wise, really grippy tyres break away and recover grip much more suddenly. I run both ends of the spectrum, Falken CR4Pos, and Dunlop Formula Rs - the Rs are great for getting round corners crazy fast, but the Falkens are more fun, and cost a hell of a lot less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At best im only an average driver on the track, i was going to get Formula Rs for my next trip to the track, but when you say they break away, is it as predictable or rather violent.

Im guessing cornering speed is up, so will they be more inclined to catch out a novice driver. Good grip-let go-grip- me off into the infield???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, they do take some getting used to, and the loss of grip is pretty sudden.

Basically, you can't change physics - the formula Rs let you pull much higher speeds and Gs around corners, so when they loose traction you're heading for the gravel faster (right Kel?).

Having said that, they're worth getting used to, you'd be amazed how much harder you can push than on average tyres. Its still quite possible to feel em going, you just need some practice.

I use em on the road sometimes (when I'm too lazy to take em off), and they really let me carve up traffic - quick off the lights too - I can use and extra 1500-2000 revs.....

Should say though, they are an extreme choice for the road, definately go something more mainstream for every day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

excited, excited, excited. Yeh im going to get the same Falkens as ive got now for the road, good in the wet, and they arent really that bad on the track.

They are getting better each track day as i think i have finally got them down to a reasonable tread depth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duncan, you highlight my concern... I want to have some fun safely, and thats why I was considering cheaper tyres over something like the Birdgestone S03's.

Which Falkens are peoples picks? the 451, or the ST115's?

If they are cheap and reasonably predictable in how they let go they might be more useful for me to learn the car - my last car was a WRX which gives you heaps of recovery ability when you get out of shape, I dont think I will have that much margin with the GTS-T.

The S03's might be more predictable than the Dunlops though as they arent race grade rubber.

Sheesh, hard call - either way its a reasonable investment and I will have them for some time, so I dont want to be cheesed off with them.

So what are peoples picks for good tyres?

I have so far:

P Zero (great grip, pricey)

S03 ( great grip, almost as pricey)

Dunlop 901's (great grip, noisey and pricey)

Falken 451 (so-so grip, reasonably priced)

Kumho Exta T712 (so-so grip, cheap)

Any others worth considering? If I dont go for the best grip money can buy for street work (like the PZero or S03), whats the next best value for money pick (that also rides well and isnt noisey) ?

Anyone? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On merit i cant really complain about the Falken 451 on my car. Ive done about 35000kms on them, too may track days where they have put up with my overdriving the car, im happy with wet weather grip, and they are quiet, economical and a good quality tyre.

One day @ Eastern Creek I commented the grip was hopeless, and when a Peter Finaly instructor drove my car he said it had good levels of grip. The car is EASY to slide about, im starting to think i posses a degree of car control. For the price they are a good performing, durable tyre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 2.2cents worth.

When I had brought my car it had Yokohama's on it. I was told that they were around $420 to replace (each) :eek:

As it was I was not very impressed with them and the car was very tail happy.

Even dangerous in the wet.

I looked around and on the day I was tossing up in the $200-300 price range.

When I spotted some Hankook's, having used hankooks on my old Van and the family car (Camry) they have always impressed me.

So any way I brought Hankook "Ventus K102's" Silica Compounds 225/50 16 92v''s

I am very very happy with them. They hold when you want them and break out when you want, and they smoke up when wanted.

At the recent skidpan day I noticed I was the only one leaving 2 nice dry lines around the track. There were quite a few cars there running far more expensive tyres.

Also on the last Mad mountain run I had a few comments on how the car handled as mine runs stock rims and suspension. All except one car I was able to keep up with and it was a much quicker Sky and they knew the road.

The cost of these tyers $150 :)

They have been on the car for around 8,000k's now and the fronts are still like new, the same can not be said for the rears which are @ 50% but that is due to many burnouts and much round-about work

For $300 for a pair try a set on th rears give it 1/2 an hour and you will be fitting them to the front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

falken grb 2's r the ones to gett the 451 wear out very quickly and have about the same grip as the grb 2's(although no longer built, thus hard to find)

115 wear out very quick

if you want all round eformance go the 512(these r not the zeix, he new model).. initially built as a average tyre that last forever but now recognised as quite a good performer

pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no one has mentioned Michelin's yet?? ..... I have Michelin MXF Sport on my R33 and they seem like a good tyre. Took them to Wakefield Park and was very happy with their grip levels and predictability. I think they're around the same price as S03's, maybe a bit more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone used Toyo Proxes TS1's?

i went prie hunting today and was told forget the bridgestone SO3's, because they don't last as long but they do perform well. The dunlop FM901's was told good but not the best performance. Then i was told to try the Toyo Proxes TS1's.

all where quoted at $380 a tyre for 255x40x17's

so anyone used them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...