Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Read thread start to end today. Was like the finale of Sopranos......

Best of luck with the next build!!

Next build , haha

He is the only bloke I know to start the next one before the last one was finished :)

But I am sure it will be worth it :thumbsup:

Next build , haha

He is the only bloke I know to start the next one before the last one was finished :)

But I am sure it will be worth it :thumbsup:

Il be retired by the time Paullie finishes the next project :P

  • Like 1

Lol

You guys can eat a big black one!

Apparently the gearbox will be delivered to Import Monsters warehouse in japan.... Then 4 weeks on a boat. In total it will be 7 months waiting for a gearbox. Totally ridiculous. There is a lead time of 6 months on their bottom ends... Which would probably be 12 going off their gearbox efforts!!!!

Next build , haha

He is the only bloke I know to start the next one before the last one was finished :)

But I am sure it will be worth it :thumbsup:

It was done... Until the gearbox died :(

  • Like 1

I had a look at that work of art.

I'd love to see a back to back with that setup! You'd need to port the balance tube to match the big dick throttles. No point having a "hump" there.

haha interesting read. About 40 pages of discussion about box, which is pretty much all I search for on the interweb anyway!

Now where is that box?

Also, what about this as an option...?

http://www.holinger.com.au/pdfs/gtr.pdf

Lol

You guys can eat a big black one!

Apparently the gearbox will be delivered to Import Monsters warehouse in japan.... Then 4 weeks on a boat. In total it will be 7 months waiting for a gearbox. Totally ridiculous. There is a lead time of 6 months on their bottom ends... Which would probably be 12 going off their gearbox efforts!!!!

And when exactly will it be delivered to IM in Japan :P

haha interesting read. About 40 pages of discussion about box, which is pretty much all I search for on the interweb anyway!

Now where is that box?

Also, what about this as an option...?

http://www.holinger.com.au/pdfs/gtr.pdf

Not as strong and straight cut so noisy plus about $8k more :(

For that money i would pay the extra and get the Albins sequential

  • Like 1

And when exactly will it be delivered to IM in Japan :P

Not as strong and straight cut so noisy plus about $8k more :(

For that money i would pay the extra and get the Albins sequential

Yessir! Gear porn!

albins.steve.ka.gtr_zpsfsr056pl.jpg

  • Like 5
  • 2 months later...

I have given it some serious thought and came to this conclusion !

STICK THE FARKIN THING IN THE "WHITE WHALE" AND GET YOUR FAT ARSE BACK BEHIND THE WHEEL AND DRIVE IT , ENJOY IT, THEY ARE WORTH NOTHING IN A BOX !!!!!!!!!!

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...