Jump to content
SAU Community

Fuel Reg

newboost

By newboost,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

newboost Rising Star

newboost

Posted
Posted

My tuner said i need to get a aftermarket fuel reg.

He forgot to mention if i should get a rising rate or a fixed one.

(malpassi,turbosmart or other)

The car is a r33 gtst.

mods so far

fmic

haltech ecu

turbo back exhaust

bosch fuel pump

splitfire coilpacks

greddy ebc

hyflowed turbo

any thoughts would be great with this one.

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398778-fuel-reg/
Share on other sites
R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Do it properly and buy a set of injectors and use the factory regulator (its fine for over 350rwkw).

Obviously depends on the hi-flow as to how viable a FPR is (without injectors).

1. If it'll only make 220rwkw then ok fair enough

2. If the hi-flow will make 250rwkw+, then dont waste time and get a set of injectors

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398778-fuel-reg/#findComment-6333497
Share on other sites
GTSBoy Grand Master

GTSBoy

Posted
Posted

As above, and generally all are rising rate? (ie with a 1:1 as the manifold pressure rises so does the fuel pressure)

yes, it absolutely needs to be rising rate in a turbo car - the rising means that fuel pressure rises as your boost does.

Um, point of order here. Rising rate regs actually increase the fuel pressure faster than the increase in signal (manifold) pressure. ie, the slope is greater than 1. Rising rate is actually a poor description for them, but that's just how it is. Most things like that are poorly named in the car world where they wouldn't be in the engineering world.

Normal fuel regs are "constant rate".....if you were to use the same poor terminology. But what they really keep constant is the delta P across the injectors.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398778-fuel-reg/#findComment-6334940
Share on other sites
XKLABA Grand Master

XKLABA

Posted
Posted

there is nothing wrong with changing the FPR, way go to the expense of injectors if a FPR will "fix it" if it doesn't need them, ie if it is getting to 99% duty cycle and the op isn't going higher with power then way not just do the FPR and give himself some headroom and save some coins, other then "it's not the right way to do it" cause the higher ressure will also help atomisation

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398778-fuel-reg/#findComment-6335099
Share on other sites
XRATED Veteran

XRATED

Posted
Posted

If you just need to sneak in a few extra psi to get you accross the line, then just get a nismo fpr that bolts onto your stock rail.... simple and neat.

If your trying to screw 50psi base pressure into it, then get injectors. Nismo, sard etc.

If you just wan't a shiny new toy for your engine bay... buy a well known brand name and make shure it's genuine.

Cheers

Justin

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398778-fuel-reg/#findComment-6335103
Share on other sites
Steve Grand Master

Steve

Posted
Posted

Do you plan on going much further with the power upgrade?

If you plan on going much further, grab some larger injectors. I have run 550s within standard FPR - but consider that most

After market injectors are rated based on a 3kg base fuel pressure, the factory FPR is rated at 2.55 kg

So 'best' option would be to get some larger injectors and a FPR - as mentioned earlier, Nismo bolt on type is a good option, minimal stuffing around and work well with the factory fuel rail.

For a budget upgrade to give a little extra injector headroom - a FPR by itself can do the job well - once again, Nismo type is neat, easy to fit and works well.

Not a fan of rising rate FPR, as you end up with higher pressure than the injectors are rated at

My 0.02c

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398778-fuel-reg/#findComment-6335164
Share on other sites
  • 8 months later...
Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

well that's the thing. any standard (or tuned) ECU is based on a specific base pressure. If you put an adjustable FPR on and are not retuning, you need to set it to the same base pressure as the previous FPR, ie there is no point.

The only real use to an adjustable FPR is to get maybe 10-20% more flow out of injectors without swapping them for something larger. In that case you must retune the car anyway, so set it to the standard base + whatever % you need and tune it from there.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398778-fuel-reg/#findComment-6730604
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Murray_Calavera
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • CF.Panda
      R34 25GT Engine Light 21

      By CF.Panda · Posted

      AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...