Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As much as I like your setup Simon, the HTA3076 is far from a bastardised version lol. Unless your calling the GTX a POS of sorts.

I think FP put a lot of effort into their compressors. Its a nice unit man, you should check it out. Also, 370 on an E85 3076 isnt unheard of either.

As much as I like your setup Simon, the HTA3076 is far from a bastardised version lol. Unless your calling the GTX a POS of sorts.

I think FP put a lot of effort into their compressors. Its a nice unit man, you should check it out. Also, 370 on an E85 3076 isnt unheard of either.

Sorry, I wasn't being derogatory by using the term bastarised! I just meant any non-Garrett billet version, no doubt there are some great ones around...

In saying that my set up isn't the best money can buy, clearly you can do better, but I would probably say it's the best cheap money can buy haha

On a roller I would say you may struggle to hit 370rwkw on a 3076R, all the ones we do on the hubber seem to make around 370rwkw when pushed but you will loose another 7-8% jumping onto a roller

Edited by SimonR32
In saying that my set up isn't the best money can buy, clearly you can do better, but I would probably say it's the best cheap money can buy haha

Agreed, for a cheap setup I can't think of a better combination straight off the top of my head.

A GT30 turbine wheel at 350rwkw would be choking like all hell. I'd go a GTX3576R with a T3 divided 1.06 housing if you're not keen to go down the BW path (again).

On pump gas, yes it would. On E85, 350kw isn't so much of a tall ask IMHO. We have guys here who were running nearer 400kw @ 4 hubs on track cars with standard issue 56t GT3076Rs. The 370rwkw target can't be promised, though inconsistant dyno reading levels across the board mean that its a bit of a hard one to call - realistically the best any of us can do is suggest turbos that would float in that range and offer a good compromise between the acceleration and response he'd hope for in terms of things in that range.

In regards to the GTX3576R TS, I'm not convinced it'd justify its price. This is going to be a track car, the ATP twin scroll housings are not the most reliable under heavy use and there is a real chance of the divider failing - unless you know of someone else making a 1.06TS turbine housing for these. Would be an interesting combination, they have me curious but so far unconvinced.

On a roller I would say you may struggle to hit 370rwkw on a 3076R, all the ones we do on the hubber seem to make around 370rwkw when pushed but you will loose another 7-8% jumping onto a roller

There are plenty that have gone >360kw on hub dynos on E85, bare in mind the vast majority here have internal gates, and pump gas - there aren't THAT many with decent plenums, exhaust manifolds, E85 and 20+psi of boost going through them.

In regards to the GT3076R-HTA, and dyno readings - I'm sure most people know Mustang dynos are probably the closest reading dynos to Dyno Dynamics. Here's an interesting thread where a guy with a twin scroll EFR7670 runs into issues with his build which was initially tuned on a Dynapack and made over 600hp @ hubs. His car ends up being tuned later by Buschur Racing on his Mustang Dyno, where it ends up in the mid 500whp range - then finds itself subject to a comparison with a single scroll GT3076R HTA with a TiAL .82a/r turbine housing, and the results are interesting...

Full thread can be seen here: http://m.evolutionm.net/showthread.php?t=573459

And where Buschur retunes it, and gives his thoughts on how the EFR behaves - and then the conversation floats into comparison with the GT3076R HTA in following pages: http://m.evolutionm.net/showpost.php?p=9705827&postcount=298

I more show the thread as general information, you can see that the GT30 when matched with a compressor that appears to get on well with it isn't THAT much of a problem (considering the EFRs are supposed to be "all that" in terms of turbine flow and the HTA looks to be happier. If you were to believe the BW/Full Race hype the EFR7670 would be THE no expense spared turbo to choose for these kinds of power levels, and here we have a single scroll HTA turbo schooling one.

The new .82 and 1.06 T3 divided housings are supposedly 100% garrett unlike the .78 housings that are sleeved by ATP.

I know high 300's can be done with a GT30 turbine but I'll pass on having 50psi in my exhaust manifold.

OK, for people who can't see EVOM:

E85, 30psi, EFR7670, Dynapack:

Robi_Denkers_Red_RS.jpg

On Mustang at 28psi:

BDGR8GRIP.jpg

I pulled up my logs from the HTA3076. The lowest boost the turbo was run at was 30.5 psi peak. On that run the car made 557 whp-500 ft lbs. The car hit 20 psi at 3650 rpm. 30.5 psi was hit at 4079 rpm' date=' at 8,000 rpm the car still had 25.6 psi of boost.

So yes, the EFR 7670 is making good power at 28.3 psi with it's 539 whp/480 ft lbs. It's 2.2 psi of boost down, figuring about 10/10 increase per psi, we'd be at 559/500, just about identical to the HTA3076. Being identical to what some have basically called back yard engineered technology isn't stellar if you ask me. Boost wise the EFR7670 was at 20 psi at 3863 rpm, 28.3 at 4379 and down to 22 psi at 8,000 rpm. All of which are lower/less than the HTA3076.

I would take the HTA3076 hands down, no questions asked over this turbo. Take into consideration the small tube header on this EFR kit and the twin scroll housing. Then take into consideration the HTA3076 was tested on my large diameter runner single scroll .82 a/r housing. It's a no brainer.[/quote']

... And for an actual 3076HTA dyno plot on full attack (ok, not what you'd normally do - but if it can go THIS far then I'd have thought 370awkw/500whp shouldn't be out of the question):

Robert at Forced Performance wanted me to try this HTA3076 at 40 psi of boost before I removed it from my RS. I told him no problem' date=' when I got a chance. Well this morning I had a few minutes between dyno tunes and we threw the car on the dyno. I guessed at the boost controller, but since it is a BR controller my guess was on the money[img']http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/src:forums.evolutionm.net/get/images/smilies/wink.gif[/img] The car hit a peak boost of 39.8 psi, I spent no additional time dialing in timing or AFR's, the car is a bit rich up top gets down to about 11.5:1, not horrible and not hurting power but the point is I spent no time optimizing the tune.

Anyway, I will let this graph speak for itself:

Turbo39psi102111.jpg

That my friends is BAD ASS! The un-smoothed numbers came up 609 whp and 610 ft lbs of torque! This is the first car I know of that has broken 600 ft lbs on this dyno. This is the basic power/torque I was looking for when I built my RS this last time and why the 2.3RPM engine lives today, for this purpose 600+ ft lbs of torque.

Unbelievable. This IS the turbo for an EVO. I will have a hard time recommending a Green/Red or anything else to most EVO owners after doing the testing on this turbo this week.

Did you follow the link and read the customer reviews of them?

One of the guys was a 2.5litre Subie guy making 21psi by 3750rpm, and 325awkw (436whp on a Mustang Dyno) on US 93 Octane at 24psi... I found a thread from the same guy, see here: http://forums.nasioc...d.php?t=2083214

Made 499awhp on 28psi on C16, E85 would probaby get similar or better gains.

So basically what i could gather from your post Lith, is that GT3076-HTA = uncensored turbo pr0n. Like the gtx series, do these respond better to high pressure ratios? I cant seem to find a compressor map for these..

I haven't experienced one first hand, and there are no flow maps that I have seen released so I am only going from results and testimonies - which I have not found anything but good from. I have mates with FP GT3582R-HTA and FP GT3586R-HTA turbos and they have had awesome luck with those too, both at sane boost levels and at high ones, so I consider FP and their HTA technology to be a reasonably safe bet to deliver.

From results I've seen, I can definitely extrapolate that yeah... like the GTX it is a turbo which starts coming into its own as boost levels drift north of 1.2bar boost as opposed to everywhere. This doesn't mean its going to lack at all compared to a run of the mill GT30R etc at those levels, it just means that its not a replacement for a bigger turbo like a GT3582R (or bigger) *IF* you have an engine that has huge flow at moderate boost levels. They perform well across the board, but if you're going to take them with a dose of alcohol and 20+psi - thats where you're going to get some impressive numbers compared to a run of the mill item.

The thing that attracts these to me is that they provide better response and theoretical compressor/turbine match than the normal GT3076R (as opposed to the GTX, which Garrett ended up deciding better suited to a GT35) so a GT3076R-HTA technically has it over a normal GT3076R even if it flowed no better at any boost level.

I found a good test on a comparison of a 3076R, 3582R, HTA 3076R, HTA 3582R and a PTE 5858 last night and bookmarked the link at home, just did a quick google and couldn't find it again but I'll post tonight if I remember...

The general gist was the HTA made tiny bit more power top end and a decent amount better response

I've asked Full Race for their opinion/selection given my target.

Will be interesting to see what they come back with given they have many turbos in their stable to choose from.

And you expect the response to be anything short of: 'The BW EFR is the bee's knee's, buy this now.' ?

I doubt a company as commercial as FR will recommend a product they don't back.

On the same token I'm sure if you email FP they are going to recommend you the HTA LOL.

And you expect the response to be anything short of: 'The BW EFR is the bee's knee's, buy this now.' ?

I doubt a company as commercial as FR will recommend a product they don't back.

On the same token I'm sure if you email FP they are going to recommend you the HTA LOL.

That may be true, but they offer several brands and they are well aware of my history with EFR.

I've also told Brett I'm looking for a 'budget' type solution so that probably rules out EFR.

He'll give me a fair assessment, no question.

I found a good test on a comparison of a 3076R, 3582R, HTA 3076R, HTA 3582R and a PTE 5858 last night and bookmarked the link at home, just did a quick google and couldn't find it again but I'll post tonight if I remember...

The general gist was the HTA made tiny bit more power top end and a decent amount better response

Definately interested in this!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...