Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sounds good! I wish I had gone a bit higher on my build (9:1) as I will be using WMI with some safely measures just in case there is a failure of the system.

You could go really crazy and try and implement a DIY direct injection system to assist! Copy the BMW N54/55 design :) ) Would love to see that one day on an RB.

What are peoples thoughts on building a high comp motor with custom pistons with say 11:1 ratios or around that then running turbo and e85?

Need more power Simon? Or just building a backup engine, nothing's impossible but you'll need a big budget, personally I wouldn't go higher then 10:1 but if you could pull off 11:1 it would be epic. The tune would have to be perfect and same with the build there's no room for error with that much comp, fuel would need to be under strict monitoring also.

Ive found that some of my +T setups have been sensitive to turbo choice. IE with an SR+T I found I could max a T28 on 9.5:1 and smash the performance of the equivilent DET 8.5:1, however moving to a TD05H 18G saw it was a lot harder to get the very most out of it.

In all cases ive experienced the cars have a lot more midrange with the added 1:1

I did however set sail to fail on my 10:1 setup, and am hoping to fix that soon.

I know this would be abit to extreme for you're application but have you considered a composite turbo setup? ie little turbo blowing into a bigger turbo so there's boost throughout the rev range? Ive had great success with this on duramax's but its been a HUGE budget involved. Considering though you have easy access to custom metal fabricators this wouldn't be such a challenge. Food for thought.

R u sure its smaller man? Im pretty sure the area across the firewall is the same but theres more room between the strut towers (i could be wrong). Its definitely shorter though.

Imagine rocking up to ANY event with a compound turbo setup, LOL

dont want to be shaving the head that much to increase compression... you'll reduce the cumbustion chamber size.

need custom pistons with a higher crown height.

Would love to build a stroker RB28 with 10.5 - 11:1 CR balanced within a micron of its life to allow it to rev, Nitto spline drive pump to keep it lubricated. would be fairly nuts i would thing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...