Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, yes i know this has been covered before in a similar sense. I have read those threads.

But i'm really here to ask what in the hell are the exact differences between these two ECU's.

The software is almost identical, the amount of inputs and outputs are identical, the connectors to the ECU's are identical, Their capability seems to be the same.

The only real difference i can see is the branding and the colour of the cases.

I'm wondering which one to go for, not based on a price comparison or if my tuner can tune them. Just the reasons (if any) i should favour one over the other.

I have had a quick read through both ECU manuals, it seems that one 'company' has pretty much done a copy and past from the other companies ECU manual for their own ECU manual. A lot of it is word for word. However i have not ready both manuals all the way through so there may be some differences in there.

Anyone able to help?

I need an ECU with stacks of inputs and outputs that i can fully configure. Which is why i'm looking at these two.

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've heard many different things about the differences, some say they are identical, some say stay away from link, some say stay away from Vipec.

Both ECU's should drive the factory coil packs fine. Whether they are the external igniter coil packs of the internal igniter coil packs. They should drive them both.

Doesn't matter to me, as i'm doing away with the factory CAS and the factory coils.

If there is absolutely no difference, i'd probably grab the Link as my tuner is a dealer for them. But i'm not making a decision because he's a dealer. Only if the link was better or exactly the same.

Does anyone know if you can buy expandable I/O cards for either of these ECU's that will plug into CAN?

I've never heard "stay away from Link" or "stay away from Vipec". The product is the same maybe the dealer support differs in different areas. If you have technical questions that are not answered on the website telephone or email and you will get the answer from the horse's mouth:

http://www.linkecu.com/

and for the doubters the worlds fastest RB30 is controlled by a Link:

http://www.linkecu.c...30-runs-link-g4

once again, for prosperity

from Link website

Link was one of the very early market entrants twenty years ago. 2010 witnessed a turn-around in the market perception of the Link name thanks to the technical excellence of its product. The launch of the ViPEC brand has seen a new product pitched against high end competitors with outstanding results. Continued clear and unambiguous differentiation is further required to propel the ViPEC name higher

my emphasis

brand, not company. Vipec will forever be a rebadged Link. Period.

i looked at the Xtreme but the wiring job was going to be the main hurdle, but i do believe that NZEFI or someone over there has made up a harness of some sorts, still a bit of wiring to do, but a lot of the work done.

Do they drive nissan coilpacks/igniters properly yet? Does the closed loop boost control work properly? I want to grab one but the Vipec forum made for too scary a read

closed loop boost works, and i have never had an issue with it driving my coils/ignitor

you must be reading the ooooold posts if you are reading about the boost control being only basic, all the extra features are just software updates to the ecu, no hardware changes.

The Vipec has inbuilt knock detection. The earlier Link G4 Extreme had them AFAIK, and when Vipec negotiated , part of the deal was the G4 couldnt have knock control, and something else that i cant quite remember right now. Im sure someone with the exact differences will jump on soon. Lithium will probly know.

The link, you need a knockblock. It can be permanently wired into an input, or just use it when your tuning, like i did.

Edited by gotRICE?

they are identical for what we need them for here, but there are differences.. major one being that the vipec v88 supports electric throttle so i can put them on brand new cars. the link does not support this unless you buy an add on or something.

another difference is that the vipec will support low impedence injectors because it has peek and hold drivers, the link needs to have a fugly resistor setup.

also the vipec is not a re-badged link. the vipec came first. the vipec was made first and then the g4 range re-badged the vipec but with less options.

Guilt-Toy you seem to know alot about these.

So the electronic throttle is that the big difference? What are some of the smaller differences, you said the Link can't drive low impedance injectors which is fine for me as i have high impedance injectors.

What do you think of the wire in looms that come with both ECU's? Are they well done?

yes i am a Vi-pec dealer. i have tuned shitloads of them. i have also tuned many links.

The looms are great. i have never seen the pre-made engine specific looms, only the original generic ones from vipec / link.

The Vipec has inbuilt knock detection. The earlier Link G4 Extreme had them AFAIK, and when Vipec negotiated , part of the deal was the G4 couldnt have knock control, and something else that i cant quite remember right now. Im sure someone with the exact differences will jump on soon. Lithium will probly know.

The link, you need a knockblock. It can be permanently wired into an input, or just use it when your tuning, like i did.

G4 Xtreme has knock control, 2 inputs for it i think.

What are some of the smaller differences, you said the Link can't drive low impedance injectors which is fine for me as i have high impedance injectors.

seems like it can? :wacko:

Peak & Hold

The G4 Xtreme has eight channels of independently configurable, peak and hold fuel injection control.

With high impedance injectors it is possible to apply the full battery voltage (saturation) across the injector during the whole time that it must stay on. The injector current will be limited by the injector’s coil resistance so that no damage will occur. With low impedance injectors this is not the case. When the injector pulse widths are high, driving low impedance injectors in this way will result in excessive current that will damage the injectors and/or ECU. One solution (the one used by most car manufacturers) is to fit ballast resistors to limit the injector current to a safe level. The only downside of this approach is that it increases the time taken for the injector to open. This is of no concern on most factory engines as the injectors never need to operate near their minimum pulse width for consistent operation. However, when large injectors are used in after market performance applications, very short pulse widths are required at idle and low load. In this case it is desirable to have an injector that can open as quickly as possible. To do this the G4 Xtreme’s injector control can be set to Peak and Hold. This will initially apply the full battery voltage across the injector to open it then the ECU will limit the current to a safe level while still keeping the injector open.

The G4 Xtreme employs low heat technology to digitally control the injectors ensuring minimum current draw and very little heat to be dissipated.

Individual Cylinder Fuel Correction allows the fueling of each individual cylinder to be adjusted independently. This can be used to compensate for slight differences in injector flows, slight differences in fuel pressure at each injector, differences in cylinder temperature due to coolant system design, etc...

another difference is that the vipec will support low impedence injectors because it has peek and hold drivers, the link needs to have a fugly resistor setup.

also the vipec is not a re-badged link. the vipec came first. the vipec was made first and then the g4 range re-badged the vipec but with less options.

Tempted to forward this to Link and see what they have to say about that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...