Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

there must be a 3.5 diff that comes out in a r32 or something similar... the diff in my r32 that i purchased here.. the diff was crazy... 4th gear will spin the rear wheels to 260km/h.

when i removed the diff it looked like a GTS-T diff of some sort, because it did not have the GTR type tail shaft setup that the gtr's do and it was a viscous because i shimmed the diff.

it was with my 380kw rb30det setup, and the car really did suck to drive, i hated it. off boost it was just boring for me, you couldnt get the wheels to spin or have any fun off boost you had to always load up the engine before anything interesting happen. when on boost the gears went forever and it was just boring.

when driving the car before i realised the diff gears were out the car was just dangerous, at that kind of speeds in 4th gear i slowed down and wondered why the car felt soo unsafe, i only worked it out when on the dyno and i saw the wheel speed at the top of a dyno pull when i started to wonder wtf is wrong.

and drifting that car SUCKED, had to drift in first gear because dropping the clutch in second gear was impossible, the car would go sideways but because the wheels are spinning sooo fast 140km/h + you just put out soo much smoke and then lose it because of the high wheel spin speed at such slow speeds.

i took the diff out and installed a r32 gtr diff, and welded it. all is good now the car is awesome to drive.

my 350z with a rb30dett with rb25det box also has a 3.5 ratio, this one i don't mind so much because its a daily driver, but same goes with r32.. i dont ever bother trying to do any kind of drifting or burnouts as it just puts too much strain on the drive train and its just plain old stupid... i already broke the diff in the 350z and i am looking at changing it back to a 4.11:1 to match the 25 box as these things had a 6 speed standard.

however the good thing is because i do alot of highway driving, i can cruise in 5th gear doing 155km/h for hours on end without any overheating issues or any problems at all, get great fuel economy also... i drive to work which is a 150km trip, 70% of that i am sitting on 155km/h and im reving at 3500 or so rpm, in the skyline it would be at 4.2k + (diff is a normal 32gtr one now) ??

if anyone can help me to get a 4.11:1 or even 3.9 into my 350z that would be nice.

I would seriously not change the diff gears unless you want better fuel economy and dont care about enjoying your car the way it should be enjoyed...

maybe if you can change the 5th gear cog only to drop the rpm down would be a better option too.

don't change it.. if your adding extra torque then.... ...... .. "enjoy it, don't destroy it!" IMHO

My problem is I only have 3 gears so thats why im looking to change diff ratios. The 4.1 in it is ok but i think a 3.5 would make it better to drive and faster down the track. Currently cruising down the highway if you pull out to pass anyone anymore that half throttle turns into wheelspin.

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

ok, i have a 32 gtr that i have nearly finished the conversion in.

thinking about going to the tomi=ei 34 gtr "short"diff gear set.

3.8?? ratio.

my thoughts are, bring cruise rpm on freeway down, without sacraficing too much of the pick up.

extra capacity should outway that anyway.

inputwould be appreciated.

I partially agree only with an RB30 I think a slightly taller diff ratio and a shorter 5th ratio would make it nice .

I always thought the 0.76 5th was a big jump over a direct 4th and it may need to be this way if you wanted to drop back to 4th and boot it - as in get enough revs up to haul . Thats with a std capacity RB25 or 26 BTW .

I still think the revs needed at 110 km/h are too high with the standard gearing but without a closer spaced 6spd gearbox its always going to be a compromise . They obviously knew this and fixed it on the later Z cars .

I don't suppose the 6 cog can be grafted on an RB block ?

A .

reading your threads, you seem to be wanting an rb25 to have the torque that a big engine would have, as in low down streetable torque, to me an rb25 will never have that unless it has a smallish turbo that chokes on the top end so little top end.. you cant make a small engine a big engine even with E85 and whatever..

I agree that a streetable car needs low end torque at partial throttle, and the stock VL turbo has always had that, a stock vl turbo with the usual intercooler, boost, exhaust would have all the low down torque your after and with longer gears, eg 2500rpm in fifth is 110-115km/hr,

In my opinion its hard to beat the RB30et for street duties, the rb25 is just a different beast and needs 4000rpm onwards and will never be great on the bottem end.. if it is then its all wrong cause it was never meant for that and it will be sacrificed in the mid to top end, Im not sure what a rb2530 does down low, but im guessing it would need revs being multi-valve.. the rb30et's manual gear box is totally up to the task as far as ratio's, and its diff seemed very adequate to me, that was with 200kw's.. went like a cut snake..

reading your threads, you seem to be wanting an rb25 to have the torque that a big engine would have, as in low down streetable torque, to me an rb25 will never have that unless it has a smallish turbo that chokes on the top end so little top end.. you cant make a small engine a big engine even with E85 and whatever..

I agree that a streetable car needs low end torque at partial throttle, and the stock VL turbo has always had that, a stock vl turbo with the usual intercooler, boost, exhaust would have all the low down torque your after and with longer gears, eg 2500rpm in fifth is 110-115km/hr,

In my opinion its hard to beat the RB30et for street duties, the rb25 is just a different beast and needs 4000rpm onwards and will never be great on the bottem end.. if it is then its all wrong cause it was never meant for that and it will be sacrificed in the mid to top end, Im not sure what a rb2530 does down low, but im guessing it would need revs being multi-valve.. the rb30et's manual gear box is totally up to the task as far as ratio's, and its diff seemed very adequate to me, that was with 200kw's.. went like a cut snake..

I have an RB30/25 in a heavy Stagea (280awkw atm) but it pulls fine from 1000 rpm - as my exhaust is quite noisy I drive around town changing up at just under 2000rpm. When I say it pulls fine it keeps up with the traffic but if I want to outdrag the Holden or Evo next to me at the lights I have to give it a bootfull of revs to launch it so I tend not to!

Good idea - I am going 3.545 in my heavy Stagea... with your R32 and RB30 3.8 should be a breeze.

this is what i was thinking.

i think even with the extra capacity, the 3.5s would just be too tall with standard gearbox ratios.

the 4.11s too short.

the tomeis seem to be a happy middle ground, that is available off the shelf.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...