Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't expect people to agree with my reasoning but no i don't like those return pipe things . Can't see the sense of having a return pipe when a tank can have dual roles .

The reason I dont like bar and plate IC cores is because I don't think the air flowing through to the radiator get an easy time , round edge tubes are a better compromise I think .

I doubt a Trust turn flow is going to magically fall in my lap but there are a few alternatives to look into .

I was looking at Datalogit software with SK yesterday afternoon and he thinks the easiest way to increase the fuel injected across the board is to change the injector settings on the LHS of I think the injectors setting page from 48 to I think 62.4 . I think the logic is that 740s are twice the size of the std 370s and the compensation in my case was 48% . 48 times 1.3 = 62.4% . This is probably a crude dirty way to go about starting the Eflex experiment but I can't think of an easier one to start with . I just need to buy a length of low pressure fuel hose so i can connect it to the low pressure side of the reg and pump the 98 out into fuel containers . I've two 10s and a 5L container of Eflex to play with so if I can tip 5 or so in and get it to start and run I can pour in a bit more and see how it drives . If its not workable I can pump it out again and revert to 98 and the current "livable" settings .

I also asked him about AFR vs lamda and he reckons Tech Edges can be switched between the two . I guess its getting my head around E85 being something like 8.8:1 instead of petrols 14.7:1 . I can see where lamda cuts the confusion because the ideal ratio is always 1 not matter what the fuel is .

Working today so probably no time to get into this till Wednesday or Thursday .

A .

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I guess its getting my head around E85 being something like 8.8:1 instead of petrols 14.7:1 . I can see where lamda cuts the confusion because the ideal ratio is always 1 not matter what the fuel is .

If you leave the wideband in petrol afr's you don't have to change anything. It will still be 14.7:1 as the wideband reads lambda anyway and converts it.

Just changing injector size will get you running but mine requires 50% more fuel at cruise/light load and approx. 25% at wot. It isn't a set figure.

Nothing wrong with the turnflow concept. The air has to go back to the passenger side of the car somehow, it might as well be behind the bumper reo. I had one built from a truck core for my car last century. Still using it. Little pressure drop, good efficiency. May not support stupidly high power levels, but then I haven't had to cut any (illegal) holes in the car for it either.

The turn flow is hardly going to be an issue on a sub 270rwkw car.

The air has to turn at some point and you are reluctant to cut a hole in the other side of the engine bay so whichever way you cut it a Blitz cooler will meet all your needs.

I still think if it's not getting tracked hard the SMIC could do alright, stick a small fan behind it maybe and/or add a small water sprayer to it and you could get away with it quite easily especially if running E85

I am not sure why you just don't buy an off the shelf kit. Using a XR6 core, then fking about with piping, etc.. will end up costing more than just buying a JJR return flow kit, if you're a brand wh0re just get the Blitz return kit for like $800.

I even taken the liberty of providing direct links to each product:

Blitz: I lied, they're $699 even better

http://justjap.com/store/product.php?productid=19402&cat=339&page=1

Cooling pro: Good enough for the power levels you're aiming for

http://justjap.com/store/product.php?productid=17355&cat=339&page=1

I still think if it's not getting tracked hard the SMIC could do alright, stick a small fan behind it maybe and/or add a small water sprayer to it and you could get away with it quite easily especially if running E85

cooling isnt the issue, its airflow that concerns me, JZA80 side mount intercoolers are way bigger than R34 side mounts and the Supra ones barely flow enough for 240rwkws I just cant see the little factory core allowing enough airflow, they were designed for ~200kw at the crank not more than 300kw at the crank

no differnt to trying to make 300rwkws with a standard exhaust...you just wouldnt do it

I ended up starting with the internal cooler or Eflex .

I pumped the remaining 98 out into a fuel container via the rails return tube and a couple of meters of fuel hose . I poured a bit of Eflex in to stir up the remains and ran it until I heard the pump start to "sing" . Then it was in with 5L and jack the injector trims up 30% . With a couple of primes it fired up fine and idles better than I think it ever has with the PFC on ULP . I've been round the block a few times and it appears to drive fine so I'll fill it up later on .

The cold start tomorrow will be interesting but warm it fires first time every time .

I know the intercooler won't cope but that will be replaced in time .

Cheers A .

Just drop 80-100% into the cold start enrichment under 20 degrees and you should be fine. I have found double the fuel is required on average for cold start from my experience.

without proper specs you'll be firing it all day and pulling plugs out to dry them.. my settings turnt out to be a different from what was recommended with the formula's , took alot of hair pulling out sessions to hear it run properly... slightly less than double the fuel in my case

without proper specs you'll be firing it all day and pulling plugs out to dry them.. my settings turnt out to be a different from what was recommended with the formula's , took alot of hair pulling out sessions to hear it run properly... slightly less than double the fuel in my case

At least they don't foul, just dry them off or let it sit for an hour. :)

When I went to gas it up the temp gauge was showing zip but it started again first time . I added a bit more timing here and there and it just continues to get better . The only unusual thing it did was not return to idle as fast as it should and when starting revs briefly to 2000 sometimes . It been years but maybe I have to do that idle learning thing again .

The local Caltex Eflex servo is selling at $1.129/L and 90L cost ~ $79.60 , beats paying when the price was low $1.469/L for Ultimate 98PULP .

Will dust off the Tech Edge and see what it shows tommorow , A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...