Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

0nly badge it needs is on that says "F**K YEAH"

Haha cheers mate, may detract from the look I am after ;)

I take my hat off to you sir...phenomenal effort.

Thanks a million Scott!

Well done on a great build.

Now every other GTR looks filthy compared to this.

Much appreciated Phil, unfortunately bnr32's are well and truly showing their age in most cases. But look what endless hard work and a significant amount of money can achieve!!

So not much has been happening of late. Latest jobs have been on the interior/electronics. Repositioned the defi display to be to view it easier. Also, got it setup properly re speed and rpm display. Input maximum rpm parameter and the shift lights working. Lastly, got warning values input for oil and water temp and oil pressure.

DSC_0911.JPG

DSC_0917.JPG

Have finally started looking at ruzic controller install. It will be going in the glovebox with an extension harness so driver can adjust as needed from the drivers seat.

BeeR is going to be mounted as pictured for ease of adjustibility and just looks dumb anywhere else! Wiring will run up into side of centre console

DSC_0909.JPG

DSC_0910.JPG

The thought of a Bee*R on this thing makes me sad :(

Whyyy Robbie? :(

Thanks for the input Martin. Have you used a BeeR personally? What were your findings?

Why? RPM control when on track and possible use of the launch control function if it proves to be useful...

Echo sentiment

Your thoughts Richard?

Edited by $$slowmedown

It's your personal choice of how the interior looks and tech gadgets based on what you intend to do with your GTR.

placement for ease of use/vision I understand. Wasn't really my place to comment.

But having already opened my mouth.

- my personal opinion is to keep gadgetry minimal, functional, fit for purpose, base on frequency of use, and out of sight (as much as is possible).

some are done well and some aren't. Bit worried - that is all.

I like the clean interior of the R32 GTR.

  • Like 1

My comment was based on the reputation of the Bee*R limiters to do damage. Whilst I don't have any first hand experience with them, I do understand how they work. And it's not good.

In case you're interested or unaware, the Bee*R limiters work by grounding the coils rather than cutting signal completely. So when you hit the desired RPM, the Bee*R sends PWM pulses to the ground side of the coil and it doesn't fire. However PWM signals aren't just an on/off voltage, they are a pulse with varying duration, and in the case of ignition, the coil pack fires when it reaches the END of the pulse not the start. So when the revs drop below the desired limit again, the Bee*R stops sending the pulses to the ground side, and the coil packs can fire again. But because it has actually delayed the pulse, the spark can now occur at the wrong point in the cycle, and effectively results in detonation the same way advancing your timing too far would. In addition, if the yellow gain knob is set too harshly (which everyone does because the faster it cuts the cooler it sounds), you get a very aggressive accel/decel, which is no good for your oil pump or valvetrain.

I can see why these things were popular when they first came out, as the idea of an ignition cut vs fuel cut sounds much healthier for the engine. However I think it was done the wrong way, and it should be cutting the signal completely via a relay, so that the cut only ever starts as a spark happens and only ever ends as a spark happens, thus cutting the cycle completely. However modern ECU's like Haltech, Link, Adaptronic etc. have all sorted out a way of making fuel cuts quite safe, as they allow a percentage of fuel/ignition to be trimmed before the hard cut, at very very fine intervals.

  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...

Cheers for the input guys, appreciated as always.

Have been flat out getting this thing finished off over the last few weeks. Will get an update up asap!!

For now I found these :teehee:

DSC05364.JPG

DSC05330.JPG

DSC05331.JPG

DSC05311.JPG

DSC05333.JPG

DSC05335.JPG

  • Like 6

The detail of this build is ridiculous. I would love to see it in the flesh.

Well done mate congrats! :worship:

Cheers Steven :D

I don't even know what to say any more. I love this car.
Also great pics again

Thanks again mate, hoping to get some professional shots done someday soon!

Starting to forget what has happened over the last few weeks so better get something up or will never happen!

Hopefully one of the last lot Nissan orders came a while ago

New wiper arms with PIAA blades fitted up

DSC_0986.JPG

Door trims back off to fit up the new interior window trim pieces

DSC_0990.JPG

DSC_0994.JPG

And forgot to get the after shot but all pretty boring stuff really, just finishing off the details!

Next up got the new rear quarter glass in (old glass was temp fitted) along with the new door opening trim that screws up to the body (again had to remove the old ones out along with the rubbers, a delicate job!!)

Also removed the Nismo option 3 piece body kit and got it fitted up properly with all new Nissan OEM clips/scrivets/screws etc and some quality 3M VHB double sided tape.

Will get photos up of the finished product just forgot at the time :/

Have also had the car back to paint shop for final detailing, had it corner weighted/wheel alignment done and new window tinting as been done. Will get details up soon...

One of the last things to do is fit up the original badges....can you anyone help me out with this?

I am chasing a car in original paint with ALL original badges so I can put mine side by side and measure up the placement of the badges accurately. Would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Edited by $$slowmedown
  • Like 1

Finally popping wheelies lol! Car going onto scales to get a base and see how everything was sitting.

DSC03168.JPG

Numbers came out as follows:

TOTAL WEIGHT (with driver 76 kg + approx. 70 L fuel = approx. 54 kg)

3,465 lb = 1,571 kg

CURB WEIGHT (less driver & fuel)

1,441 kg

CORNER WEIGHTS (WITH DRIVER)

LF = 980 lb RF = 1017 lb

LR = 710 lb RR = 757 lb

PERCENTAGES (WITH DRIVER)

FRONT = 57.63 %

REAR = 42.33%

LEFT WEIGHT = 48.77 %

CROSS WEIGHT = 49.84 %

Overall pretty happy with how numbers turned out! These were the numbers as the car sat with no adjustments needed as well.

Would of preferred it was lighter but it is what is now. Happy to hear thoughts on these or even better if you have numbers to compare?!!

Next up was wheel alignment:

DSC03172.JPG

DSC03173.JPG

DSC03179.JPG

DSC03178.JPG

DSC03186.JPG

DSC03181.JPG

All went pretty smoothly. Got it set up for a comfortable street ride that is easy on the tyres.

There was a problem with the front upper arms. More to the point with the brand new Whiteline bush kits for these....

With everything all tightened up there is a noticeable amount of slop in the bushes where the upper arms bolt up to the body. So much so that the camber could not be reliably measured/adjusted.

My mechanic got a chance to pull them off the car yesterday and straight away noticed that the problem is a design fault with the Whiteline bushes, I believe it seems to be the metal pin that sits inside is to short so when tighted up the outer bushes can't 'crush' onto it. Has anyone else experienced this issue?

All the other Whiteline gear has been fine so far...it just seems to be these upper arm bushing kits...

Any feedback/thoughts/experience would be appreciated

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
    • Welcome Adam. Car looks great!
    • "With a 1.5-WAY, the LSD is effective only during acceleration."
    • Well it wasn't as easy as I thought.... and it also wasn't in my original manual which I did end up finding. They discuss the process in the Nismo catalogue though and it requires slight machining. Page 145.  NISMO PARTS CATALOGUE 2020
    • I'm an idiot, my intercooler is rated for 1000hp. I had clicked on the wrong product. Knowing the delta P would be nice, but I'm doubtful I'll do it. Now as for an EMAP, that would be great and I'll get around to it eventually but from my findings in my last post, I'm considering a turbo swap now. 
×
×
  • Create New...