Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just watched Pinkham interview Rosberg, he hadn't heard what Hamilton said on the podium but said it's nice to hear it, and that he completely understands the teams point of view and knows it'd be exactly the same order if it was him in Hamilton's position. He said of course he would've loved to go flat out to the end but that he knows there'll be a time for that. Level headed team player.

Marko told SkySports that he agrees Seb needs to be spoken to as he disobeyed team orders. Horner said pretty much the same thing

I'm sure he won't be punished but at least they aren't hanging Webber out to dry by telling the media that the drivers are free to race to the flag

Marko told SkySports that he agrees Seb needs to be spoken to as he disobeyed team orders. Horner said pretty much the same thing

I'm sure he won't be punished but at least they aren't hanging Webber out to dry by telling the media that the drivers are free to race to the flag

so what they're saying is that they've favoured him too much and vettel thinking he is better than sliced bread has come back to bite them a little bit

and i think webber would've actually won if he hadn't backed off because he was told to. i wouldn't be surprised if that happened before the last stop, given that vettel was able to close a few second gap in 1 lap on new tyres.

and had they pitted webber before vettel at the last stop i think he would never have gotten close to him

...and in another interview he just gave Seb has just back tracked and claimed he didnt know he wasnt allowed to pass...he didnt know of the agreement and would not have passed if he knew. As soon as he said it he tried to back step a little knowing he had just lied in tv...dumb fark

to me, 2 exact same situations one with the team outcome one with the selfish outcome.

Hamilton told to slow down to conserve petrol, rosberg told not to over take and did the team thing

Webber told "21" and conserve your car, Vettel ignores the request and acts selfeshly.

Two different teams, two very different outcomes.

Selfish, selfish man.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...