Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not in the business of doing welding related fabrication work

Sorry, I thought you were by your statement.

Quote: And if any one wants their manifold to be done. The cost for doing so is $300 and our 50mm HPVA gates are $350 in additional.

The 430kw result was, for the 10th time, an RB25 in a 33gtst. The engine has cams and runs a gtx35 off an unmodified manifold, with a shitty 3 inch exhaust and a screamer on United e85. I have no idea where you got VQ from, mine is the highest output VQ25det I have heard of, and it's stuck at at 350kw due to the auto box.

Sorry, I thought you were by your statement.

Quote: And if any one wants their manifold to be done. The cost for doing so is $300 and our 50mm HPVA gates are $350 in additional.

Means I do the engineering work, and supply the gate. You are doing the welding. Which is why I've been talking to you about making external gate running out of stock exhaust manifold, and I don't think there is more then $200 of welding involved.

Well, if that is a GTX3582 then that is a tinny amount of power. I still want to see the dyno paper.

Just because it 430 kw doesnt mean the manifold wasnt a restriction as if the person used the ssme setup with a proper manifold he would obviously net good gains with that turbo.

The manifold of a Rb25det could be significantly different to a M35 Stagea which should be more modernised.

There is a 15 KWs gain just by swapping stock exhaust manifold to some thing properly made. The restriction on it is before the entry of the turbine housing, of where three collectors merges into one. By adding an additional collector at that point reduce excess heat, and pressure as what we can see in the change in upper power and torque curve.

The overall gain of this modification have made a difference of 31kws, with a final result of 376rwkws that is some thing that no one have ever made using turbine housing mounted external gate setups on standard Rb25det exhaust manifold. This is also my first attempt, there are few things that could be done improving upper rev range torque.

Scotty: it is probably worth while making a jig and properly fabricate stock RB exhaust manifold in similar manner to what I've done. With proper external gating setups, the factory exhaust manifold could be performing at same level as some of the popular aftermarket high mount setups.

so i would expect a 15kw gain from a external gate on the stock exhaust manifold? its a HKS2535

it would also help with the boost issues as well. it drops 5psi by rev limiter.

so i would expect a 15kw gain from a external gate on the stock exhaust manifold? its a HKS2535

it would also help with the boost issues as well. it drops 5psi by rev limiter.

people have done the external gate thing before on 2535's.

I think there is a bit to be gained but prob not worth the fking about unless you can do it urself. Its a small turbo which is going to struggle to flow much more air from that compressor wheel methinks... A good EBC and actuator gets the most out of the 2535 (had one myself. good little turbo :))

Looking back to my result, actually this external gate setup managed to match my Brae high mount manifold's result in exception of slightly lower in upper range torque.

G3's result which share the same compressor as the OP6 high flow.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-355

So this setup is enough to max out your 2535's compressor flow.

Scotty is coming over this weekend and we will be looking to get all the plumbings properly made and jigged, before offered as a cheap and effective service.

Before people get too excited by power gains hanging an external wastegate off the oem rb25 manifold.

Please note, it may be fine on the street, but on the track oem mani's tend to crack/warp eventually - done this twice so far.

Mind you if it ends up being a cheap welding mod, then it may work out ok.

Ps. If someone made a better steam pipe log living in that area using oem heat shield, this could be a great mod :)

So what will make a turbo come on boost faster ? A manifold with smaller internal volume ?

Yes it does. Stock manifold has better down low response and torque using the same turbocharger.

Reference:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-298

i prefer it on the housing... its the bottle neck.

This is my GT3582R setup bought from ETM.. nothing but issues and wouldn't control boost. If its plumbed into the right place on the housing should work but mine was obviously not in that basket. Granted mine is high mount blah blah not on a standard config. As soon as I changed to conventional gate of manifold configuration problem solved

post-39081-0-16510200-1389432194_thumb.jpg

post-39081-0-35427800-1389432251_thumb.jpg

It is tapped off very late on the housing, well after the nozzle, still I would have expected it to work well enough, if the inside was cleaned up with a die grinder after welding. There have been no issues with boost control on any of the modified housings I have done, and no cracking on the mild cast, or investment cast stainless housings. Even after 5 years and countless track days.

I noticed you weren't running switched boost pressure to the top port of the wastegate, that will help hold massive boost if that's what you were planning...

I had no need as I wasn't running an electronic boost controller so there was no need for a vac feed above the diaphragm. We eliminated all variables so it was just running gate pressure. took the .7 bar spring out and put a 1 bar spring in it, also tried vac feeds from the plenum and the compressor housing etc. Tried everything but the second it got to 4200rpm it would spike from 14psi straight past 35psi.

Every one of these I have seen done the waste gate feed has been different to mine. This was a kit supplied from ETM and I had no joy with it as I asked him what do you recommend and he said this configuration would give the best boost control however that was not the case I ended up selling the kit and moving on to another kit that worked wonders and never had an issue controlling boost.

Gate looks like its on a 90degree angle, probably why it didn't work.. if it were a half inch closer to the rocker cover it would of gave it the perfect entry to the gate..

Edited by AngryRB

Gate looks like its on a 90degree angle, probably why it didn't work.. if it were a half inch closer to the rocker cover it would of gave it the perfect entry to the gate..

Agreed, in that position it would almost flow backwards from the gate, similar to a paint spray gun. :P

Once gas has already accelerated to high velocity (such as in or after the nozzle in a turbine housing) it is much harder to make it change direction. Plus, the static pressure (or at least a good chunk of it) has been converted to dynamic pressure 9velocity) and there isnt actually any driving force left to make a 90° direction change. If you want it to turn 90° you have to do it while the gas is still as slow as possible.

Exactly why I binned the kit. Had nothing but issues with it from the day I bought it.

This is a mod a mate of mine is doing to his Ti R31 Skyline. GTX45 with Tial Rear housing, Tial 60mm gate and also a built RB30 single cam. He hacked into a $2700 rear housing as he couldn't plumb it from his manifold due to a 5 inch dump lol so had to go off the housing

post-39081-0-36411600-1389503053_thumb.jpg

post-39081-0-74202000-1389503067_thumb.jpg

he got it at cost price locally as he buys a lot of gear and a lot of GTX's through there. The turbo itself wasn't horrible but just sheer size of the GTX45 housing is what killed the wallet.

He has bought a mixture of GTX3071 and GTX3076's for various projects of his and the Tial rear housings were very reasonable. But this one was a killer lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...