Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Been looking at these turbos for quite some time and have been very impressed as most people are, I have a r32 with a built 26 with a gt3582 6boost and all the rest making 460rwhp, I spun a bearing now building a 26/30 and have my eyes on a super 94, my power goals are for over 500rwkw which I now the turbo is capable of, ive ordered a new 6boost mani twin scroll t4 and was thinking of going the 1.15 exhaust housing, I have a fair bit of head work done with big cans and gears, just wanted to put it past you guys before I lay the cash out.

Brad

Hi - sounds like you are on a mission for something pretty intense :D

The Super94 HTA is an awesome turbo, and as much as I'd love to see one on an RB - it's more turbo than you NEED to surpass 500kw, over 500kw is a broad term so if you mean anything over 500kw but with maximum response then the Super94 is more turbo than you need for the job.... being that its more a 600kw+ turbo when ethanol gets involved.

In saying that, I have been talking to someone with a Super99 HTZ on his 3litre Supra road car and he reckoned even that wasn't actually that hard to get to come alive once he was over 4000rpm and the Super94 is a reasonable amount smaller on the compressor. The short of it is I don't know exactly how responsive the turbo would be on a 3litre, I don't know of anyone who has used one and got it fully tuned on a 3litre yet but have absolutely no doubt at all it will go over 500kw with supporting mods to suit - I'm just not 100% sure what response you should expect compared to other turbos which will also get you in the 500kw range on E85, absolutely not saying it will be a laggy sack... just you will have one of the most responsive turbos you can get for it's target power range, let alone for the money - but if that power range is higher than yours then you may be sacrificing a bit of response.

Interestingly enough I actually had this conversation with someone a few days ago and am still soul searching whether I want to go the exact same combination on my own Skyline or not - and if I decide to build an RB30 it's one of the most likely options I'd go for. I've been in Skylines with comparatively sized (physically) turbos and motors and found them perfectly liveable for my tastes... and even if I weren't to use the full flow, I know I have something usable that isn't straining to make 500+kw and has the option of going full retard on occasion if I want to run a hero boost level. It just depends on your taste etc.

edit: You posted while I was writing my speel. AWESOME! I am really really keen to see how this goes :D I hope it turns out well, it's certainly got the potential to be a monster. Is it a GTR? Hopefully you have a strong motor, gearbox and big fuel system :D Damn that's shit timing with the pricing, they were still cheaper yesterday... I am sure.

Haha yeah should be alright, I checked yesterday they were $1875 then this morning when I woke up they were $1999 so I bought one now they are $2299, the car was a gts4 but now rwd, its going to be on e85, 5ltr surge with twin 044, 2000cc injectors, hks rail turbosmart reg, bottom end built by lewis engines and gavin wood putting it all together, still got other bits and pieces coming but yeah I agree in going the 600rwkw mark sounds more realistic

Running a gtr box still, I know its not suited but a ppg gearset is on the list or if I find another gearbox before the engine is finished, im not too worried about that now just sorting the engine out

  • 3 weeks later...

Got my HTA3076r the other day from a member on here.

Cant wait to get it on.. will be a month or so from it yet. but will post a spec sheet and results soon

Awesome, look forward to hearing how this goes - keep us updated :)

Was a built 26 running 18psi on bp98. It was pretty loose driving it then should be good fun with this new combo

It's going to be mental, would make for an awesome overlay for comparisons sake if that's possible! When are you aiming to have it going?

Ive just been ripped off on a rb30 shortblock so not too sure on when it will be going now. Fp told me it will take a few weeks to build the turbo so it should be ready to ship next week. I will be using different dynos and tuners.

  • 2 weeks later...

I definitely have ear to ground on results, and also all ready to give people bad ideas if the opportunity arises haha :) I would have succeeded in one case, but the person needs a T4 housing... argh

  • Like 1

my mate is after this type of setup atm, but due to no results atm, has gone for a Precision 6466 T3 .82 on a rb30 sohc low mounted./gate on stock manifold.

cheers

darren

Please share the result once done. I am throwing around ideas for a low budget race car.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...