Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

did you notice much in the wing etc? a mate runs the same wing on his 33 and he said he noticed a fair bit of difference

kay, i see 2 seconds, massive

Edited by Mr. Untouchable

OMG this car is a TV star...they had coverage of the Winton Supersprint on SBS/ Speedweek today. Well done :)

:cheers:

Nice work Johnny.....loving it.

Looking forward to seeing the latest additions!!

Have you had it on the scales since its diet??

Always wondered what they actually weigh......my rego sticker says 1200kg.....paha!!!

Cheers,

Dave M

Haven't yet.

They are much heavier than 1200, thats for sure. Nissan says 1370ish from the factory.

I'd say it's 1300'ish at the moment. You can take a heap off metal and gear off it, but there has been so much added.

So the focus is firmly on World Time Attack in October. Then Winton/Wakefield come up with feeder state rounds. So it's on to improve the car in readiness for the Vic round.

Weight, removing the AC

IMG_1573.jpg

And ducting between the intercooler and radiator

IMG_1574.jpg

Adding a power steering cooler at the same time.

IMG_1551.jpg

Changing the spring rates from 8/6 to 10/7, longer wheel studs

IMG_1537.jpg

A change in wheel size. From 17x9 +22 to 18x10 +35, these needed a 5mm spacer on the front to clear the inside.

Also, the regs for Vic were a little stuffed and allow club cars to run r comp tyres.

So a set of 265 A050's in medium, my first try at an r comp tyre.

IMG_1538.jpg

IMG_1545.jpg

more powerrrrrrrrrrrr

change the stock intake pipe to a hard one and give it more boost. Also had to change the actuator from the stock one to a HKS 1 bar.

IMG_1569.jpg

The little 21U won't hold boost up top and bleeds off to from 18 to 15PSI

IMG_1581.jpg

There isn't enough time for parts to come in a put the diff back together before NSW Time Attack, so I raid my brothers daily.

Which has a newer NISMO GT 1.5 way (mine is an old NISMO mech 2 way). But is a non ABS housing diff.

So I'll be running NSW TA without ABS :huh:

At the same time the rear arms go off to pedders for polly bushes and new ball joints.

IMG_1823.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...