Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol @ not liking electrical tape but using it anyway!

Heatshrink is key. So long as you made sure it was long enough to properly cover the connection its all you need. And looks much neater.

Hahaha I just used the electrical tape to tidy the wires up, Not for the actual connections. Heatshrink is the best :laugh:

Hi all, tried this on the weekend and it worked easy as pie. I cut the black wire and just ran a tiny piece of wire (about an inch long) to the screw that holds the solenoid bracket on. Just unscrewed/unbolted that one bolt, wrapped my wire around it once, then tightened it back up.

7 psi all the time now. Definately feels a lot free-er in the low end around 2500. But I have a slight dead spot now about 2100-2300... it's weird. It's definately an overall improvement though.

Here's a tip too: get some of that black 'cloth' tape and wrap both the original wire and the new wire you just ran to the bolt, in that tape. Makes it look as stock as anything!

hey i got a r33 and i think its a non turbo converted to turbo.

i dont have a boost solinoid but i got a boost controller which is hitting 10psi but it sits on 5 untill 4500???

how do i get full boost all the time.

thanks alex

  • 2 weeks later...

did this today, and wrapped my coils, gapped my plugs, drives like a different car.

i have a switch i was gonna install but after hard wireing it for testing. decided there is no need to turn it down again, boost can be right foot regulated, if you have a stock car and havent done it yet, do it now!!!!!!!!!!!

you wont be disapointed.

i actually used a male and female blade plug on each wire, so i can just plug it back in as normal if i need to for any reason

The solenoid is also some sort of a boost controller?

Stock, there is a hose from the intake tube going to the solenoid, and a T'd of hose from the hose between the actuator and intercooler pipe... I removed the piece of hosing from the T-piece, and attached the hose from the intake tube.

When it went to maximum boost, it had some misfiring, like in the coilpack thing.

But I fixed my coilpacks, it never misfires at max boost with the stock hoses... so I think it was 'over boosting'.

Am I right about my theory?

spot on, the solenoid is a boost controller, or more correctly every boost controller uses a solenoid. The solenoid is just a big switch that turns on and off, when it is on it lets air out instead of sending it to the wastegate. WHen it's off the air goes to the wastegate, and when the wastegate sees more pressure than it's spring can handle it opens. they call it "duty cycle" for what percentage of the time its open eg50% duty cycle means 50% open, 50% closed

eg if you have 7psi spring and run the boost control solenoid at 50% you will run roughly 14psi at the motor - 50% of the 14psi goes to the wastegate and 50% gets bled off by the solenoid. That's just an example, the duty cycle settings aren't that easy, they normally need some trial and error.

jaycar have a fully adjustable boost controller that uses the standard solenoid

did the grounding trick last weekend and it's much better. But i crave more, so im thinking im going to install the turbosmart t valve i have at home this weekend and tune to 10-12 psi.

Thanks guys this was top mod!

WHY is your signature only showing the top half of miss Fox?

Does anyone know if the RB25DET retains two stages of boost when you fit a boost controller without doing this mod?

  • 2 weeks later...
WHY is your signature only showing the top half of miss Fox?

Does anyone know if the RB25DET retains two stages of boost when you fit a boost controller without doing this mod?

just click on the pick for the rest of her lol

sorry if im way off the mark, but can't you just run vac line from actuator to manifold pressure?(one of the nipples on ur intake piping) Wont this run actuator pressure? without the need of boost controller? Sorry if this is wrong, just seems easier to do to get 7psi across the rev range?

  • 4 weeks later...
sorry if im way off the mark, but can't you just run vac line from actuator to manifold pressure?(one of the nipples on ur intake piping) Wont this run actuator pressure? without the need of boost controller? Sorry if this is wrong, just seems easier to do to get 7psi across the rev range?

Hello there!

Yes, I think in theory that would be working (connecting red and green in the picture),

however there might be some kind of calibrated bypass in the solenoid so not too much pressure is bled off the actuator.

See this picture: (red=compressed air, green=atmospheric/negative pressure)

blowoff.png

Edited by Torques
sorry if im way off the mark, but can't you just run vac line from actuator to manifold pressure?(one of the nipples on ur intake piping) Wont this run actuator pressure? without the need of boost controller? Sorry if this is wrong, just seems easier to do to get 7psi across the rev range?

You are correct, BUT the R33/34 Actuator is only set to 5psi, and the solenoid bleeds off an extra 2.

So running directly off the actuator would only net you 5psi. Hence why alot of people go for the R32 actuator upgrade. They run a 10psi actuator. Do away with the stock solenoid all together. Win win.

You are correct, BUT the R33/34 Actuator is only set to 5psi, and the solenoid bleeds off an extra 2.

So running directly off the actuator would only net you 5psi. Hence why alot of people go for the R32 actuator upgrade. They run a 10psi actuator. Do away with the stock solenoid all together. Win win.

I thought he meant bleeding the actuator line all the time ... but actually he didn't?

  • 2 months later...

I tried this today, opted to splice the ECU wire and earthed it on the pod filter bracket. Worked a treat, much more power in low-to-mid range with the extra boost, don't have to wait for 4500RPM to get a kick anymore! Got a boost controller on the way too but this will do temporarily :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...