Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Interesting, I think you are correct, and the first reg could be in the tank, similar to returnless fuel setups. The other rail return reg could be switched in for easy starting, and have no hot fuel returning.

  • 1 year later...

Thread revival!!!!!

I was thinking about how to retain the fpcm and get better current flow to the fuel pump. I'm no electronics guru but don't the solid state relays switch the output voltage in relation to the input voltage? So if there is a 12v input voltage the output will be 12v and if input rises to 13v then output will then allow 13v etc?

If that's the case could the solid state relay input just be the original fuel pump wiring from the fpcm and the output could use direct battery feed for the pump?

It is a loose understand of the relay's operation but i'm happy to be schooled if i'm wrong.

.

Thread revival!!!!!

I was thinking about how to retain the fpcm and get better current flow to the fuel pump. I'm no electronics guru but don't the solid state relays switch the output voltage in relation to the input voltage? So if there is a 12v input voltage the output will be 12v and if input rises to 13v then output will then allow 13v etc?

If that's the case could the solid state relay input just be the original fuel pump wiring from the fpcm and the output could use direct battery feed for the pump?

It is a loose understand of the relay's operation but i'm happy to be schooled if i'm wrong.

.

All relays do that.

But I was under the impression the solid state relays varied the output voltage to match the input where as an electromagnetic relay input doesn't influence the output it just switches on and off. The input being the switching circuit and the output being the switched. Is that any clearer?

Solid state relays would have a very low saturation voltage. I have one which is supposed to be "fully on" at about 3v, but will still pass through 96% of the source voltage at 1.6v.

Its like an extremely high gain amplifier. You would be best using some other amplifier more suited if you were intending to vary the voltage.

An SS relay works very effectively with PWM however. If you have a PWM controller that cannot supply enough current for a particular fuel pump, it can be used as a gate for a SS relay, but be sure to have a good heat sink for the relays to go on. They get quite hot once you start putting 10+ amps through them.

  • Like 1

Solid state relay I think just means it has no moving parts. It still works the same as a normal relay (in that it uses a smaller circuit to switch on a larger circuit) so it will work the same as a standard relay

You need some sort of voltage amplifier, but I feel like it would be more effort than its worth. If you are worried about the fuel getting too hot by pumping it constantly, then just install a fuel cooler

Yuh, SSRs are not transistors, even though they are effectively the same thing when seen from a long way away. The devil is in the details. That's why they're called SSRs and not "mahoosive transistors ".

If you want to switch a lot of current in the way you describe (ie with gain according to input voltage level) then you're wanting to build something with a number of big high current MOSFETs or similar. Which is what zoomzoom just said, by the way.

  • 3 years later...

Massive thread necro here but has anyone considered doing a complete revamp of the FPCM to use a buck converter instead of just increasing the ground resistance? I figure reducing load on the alternator for other items + no resistor heat dissipation to worry about would be a decent benefit for the 6V/10V modes. 

24 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Massive thread necro here but has anyone considered doing a complete revamp of the FPCM to use a buck converter instead of just increasing the ground resistance? I figure reducing load on the alternator for other items + no resistor heat dissipation to worry about would be a decent benefit for the 6V/10V modes. 

Would this not describe just about all the aftermarket variable speed fuel pump controllers out there?

1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

Would this not describe just about all the aftermarket variable speed fuel pump controllers out there?

Pretty sure, yes. PWMing a brushed motor is effectively equivalent to a buck converter.

I think the goal would be to fit the controller into the stock housing + stock harness though. And uprate the power transistors to handle 70-80A.

I'm not sure there's an advantage to retaining 20-30 yo wiring and plugs and trying to desolder them from the old module and build them onto your new board and be constrained by them needing to be in the same place to poke out through the same holes in the casing.....when some new decent connectors and a proper extruded alloy housing to screw the MOSFETs onto and freedom to lay the board out the way it needs to sound like things worth having.

Just PWM it using 100amp SSRs, because they're high current ones you won't need a heatsink, unless you're running multiple pumps off each SSR.

(Assuming you have a capable ECU). The FPCM is garbage, as it's just a BS drop resistor, which is located next to the aerial on R33. 

I'm a little bothered by the suggestion of PWM through SSRs.

Conventionally when doing PWM you use a fixed frequency, something in the order of 500Hz would be common** for simple DC power control. You then vary the width of the pulses to control the delivered "power". But that means that the SSR is literally switching on and off at 500Hz (unless you get it to either 0% or 100% ends of the PWM). And AFAIK, SSRs are not meant to be switched that fast.

Anything high power PWM just sounds to me like the output side should be actual MOSFETs (or other transistory devices that like being switched fast) not SSRs that, whilst they may have MOSFETs inside, don't necessarily like being driven that fast.

You look at any circuit designs for high power DC PWM and you don't see any SSRs. You see FETs. Lots of FETs.

 

**but obviously other PWM applications might like to run at many kHz, and AC PWM control should either be implemented at the same frequency as the supply, or some lower frequency with careful controls in place to prevent DC draw on the mains supply from halfwave switching etc.

 

I've got it set at 100hz though, seems to work well :)

Had it set at 200hz and everything made an odd hum. The Jaycar SSRs are rated at 0.5ms switch time, so apply some maths and that's smack bang at the 500hz you've mentioned. 

Honestly never looked further than the SSRs, because if modern cars use them to control massive fans and electronic water pumps, then controlling a fuel pump surely should work?

*disclaimer, I am no means an engineer, just have an interest about science and excelled at it in high school. I actually work in IT lol.

2 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

because if modern cars use them to control massive fans and electronic water pumps, then controlling a fuel pump surely should work?

Yeah, but I think there's a difference between using them as relays and just simply switching the big loads on and off at normal rates, vs. banging them on and off hundreds of times per second.

I think the Jaycar SSR switching rate that you mention is not "you can drive it this fast". I think it is "It will change output state this fast after you change the input state".

Are you insinuating they might arc to death? I did have that suspicion too hence I'm running 2x SSRs, one for each 460L Wallahbro pump. Each of the SSRs are rated at 100amp (max load that is) however I'm assuming each pump would only drain a theoretic max of approx. 20amp at the fuel pressure I intent to run them at.

F90000267_Specs.jpg.f9094c4d0baa80d7a1a96d7a0cdeb965.jpg

 

A SSR cannot "arc" as part of normal operation.

Without an oscilloscope, you can't characterise any particular SSR, except trusting the datasheet. Or trust the ebay listing details - lol.

From memory, I was able to use those cheap fotek ones up to switching a 1kHz square wave. But I've never used them in anything critical like a fuel pump.

The problem with switching frequency is that you increase the time spent in a transition region between on and off states, where the power dissipated in the switching element is the product of the current and voltage across the device. Eventually it reaches a frequency where the device is floating in a partially on state - which is bad news.

I doubt any ECUs take the PWM frequency that high though, they only seem to go to a few hundred Hz tops, and it should be adjustable.

Also be sure that you SSR is legit. From memory a youtube creator called Big Clive did a tear down of one, only to find a measly 10-15amp rated  TRIAC as the switching element.

Anyway, an oscilloscope is the tool to measure this stuff.

  • Like 1
7 minutes ago, zoomzoom said:

A SSR cannot "arc" as part of normal operation.

Yeah, I was gunna say this. I'm not sure what the path to failure would look like for a mistreated SSR. As zoomzoom says above, when they float between on and off they consume a lot of power themselves and will get hot, which could fail gracefully..... or in a fire. I also don't know how much abuse (intensity &/or duration) they can cop. Arguably, switching them at hundreds of Hz for many hours is an enormous number of state changes. 2000 hours at 100Hz is 720 million state changes. It's probably OK.....but it sounds like it adds up quick. It would take a few years of commuting to get 2000 hours. 2000 hours of track use would either come much sooner or never, depending on the type of track usage. A truck would do 2000 hours in ~6 months.

I'm not shitcanning the idea, just mentioning that I think it is not the way that they are intended to be used.

  • Like 1

Might have to go back to the drawing board now with what you guys have mentioned :(

Thought I was being smart by not staging pumps (Not my cup of tea because you get pressure spikes as pumps come online). Not visible on a gauge but definitely visible when you run fuel pressure sensors.

From what I gather I should just bin the whole fuel pumps running on PWM and just have them full noise with a massive fuel cooler to manage heat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers)
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
    • OK, Step 3, if you need to remove the valve body, either to replace it, the TCM, or to do a more complete drain.  First, you need to disconnect the TCM input wires, they are about half way up the transmission on the drivers side. One plug and the wires are out of the way, but there is also a spring clip that stops the socket from sliding back into the transmission. On my car the spring clip was easy to get, but the socket was really stuck in the o-ring of the transmission housing and took some.....persuasion. You can see both the plug to remove (first) and the spring clip (second) in this pic Incidentally, right next to the plug, you can see where the casting has allowance for a dispstick/filler which Nissan decided not to provide. there is a cap held on with a 6mm head bolt that you can remove to overfill it (AMS recommend a 1.5l overfill). Final step before the big mess, remove the speed sensor that is clipped to the valve body at the rear of the box.  Then removal of the Valve Body. For this the USDM Q50 workshop manual has a critical diagram: There are a billion bolts visible. Almost all of them do not need to be removed, just the 14 shown on the diagram. Even so, I both removed one extra, and didn't check which length bolt came from which location (more on that later....). Again it is worth undoing the 4 corners first, but leaving them a couple of turns in to hold the unit up....gravity is not your friend here and trans oil will be going everywhere. Once the corners are loose but still in remove all the other 10 bolts, then hold the valve body up with 1 hand while removing the final 4. Then, everything just comes free easily, or like in my case you start swearing because that plug is stuck in the casing. Done, the valve body and TCM are out
    • OK, so if you are either going for the bigger fluid change or are changing the valve body which includes the Transmission Control Module (TCM), first you should have both a new gasket 31397-1XJ0A and a torque wrench that can work down to 8Nm (very low, probably a 1/4 drive one). You can probably get by without either, but I really didn't want to pull it all apart together due to a leak. First, you now need that big oil pan. The transmission pan is 450 long x 350 wide, and it will probably leak on all sides, so get ready for a mess. There are 24x 6mm headed bolts holding the pan on. I undid the 2 rear corners, then screwed those bolts back in a couple of turns to let the pan go low at that end, then removed all the middle bolts on each side. Then, undo the front corner bolts slowly while holding the pan up, and 80% of the fluid will head out the rear. From there, remove the remaining bolts and the pan is off. You can see it is still dripping oil absolutely everywhere...it dripped all night.... I got another couple of litres when I removed the pan, and then another few when I removed the valve body - all up another 4l on top of the 3 already dropped in step 1.
×
×
  • Create New...