Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Interesting, I think you are correct, and the first reg could be in the tank, similar to returnless fuel setups. The other rail return reg could be switched in for easy starting, and have no hot fuel returning.

  • 1 year later...

Thread revival!!!!!

I was thinking about how to retain the fpcm and get better current flow to the fuel pump. I'm no electronics guru but don't the solid state relays switch the output voltage in relation to the input voltage? So if there is a 12v input voltage the output will be 12v and if input rises to 13v then output will then allow 13v etc?

If that's the case could the solid state relay input just be the original fuel pump wiring from the fpcm and the output could use direct battery feed for the pump?

It is a loose understand of the relay's operation but i'm happy to be schooled if i'm wrong.

.

Thread revival!!!!!

I was thinking about how to retain the fpcm and get better current flow to the fuel pump. I'm no electronics guru but don't the solid state relays switch the output voltage in relation to the input voltage? So if there is a 12v input voltage the output will be 12v and if input rises to 13v then output will then allow 13v etc?

If that's the case could the solid state relay input just be the original fuel pump wiring from the fpcm and the output could use direct battery feed for the pump?

It is a loose understand of the relay's operation but i'm happy to be schooled if i'm wrong.

.

All relays do that.

But I was under the impression the solid state relays varied the output voltage to match the input where as an electromagnetic relay input doesn't influence the output it just switches on and off. The input being the switching circuit and the output being the switched. Is that any clearer?

Solid state relays would have a very low saturation voltage. I have one which is supposed to be "fully on" at about 3v, but will still pass through 96% of the source voltage at 1.6v.

Its like an extremely high gain amplifier. You would be best using some other amplifier more suited if you were intending to vary the voltage.

An SS relay works very effectively with PWM however. If you have a PWM controller that cannot supply enough current for a particular fuel pump, it can be used as a gate for a SS relay, but be sure to have a good heat sink for the relays to go on. They get quite hot once you start putting 10+ amps through them.

  • Like 1

Solid state relay I think just means it has no moving parts. It still works the same as a normal relay (in that it uses a smaller circuit to switch on a larger circuit) so it will work the same as a standard relay

You need some sort of voltage amplifier, but I feel like it would be more effort than its worth. If you are worried about the fuel getting too hot by pumping it constantly, then just install a fuel cooler

Yuh, SSRs are not transistors, even though they are effectively the same thing when seen from a long way away. The devil is in the details. That's why they're called SSRs and not "mahoosive transistors ".

If you want to switch a lot of current in the way you describe (ie with gain according to input voltage level) then you're wanting to build something with a number of big high current MOSFETs or similar. Which is what zoomzoom just said, by the way.

  • 3 years later...

Massive thread necro here but has anyone considered doing a complete revamp of the FPCM to use a buck converter instead of just increasing the ground resistance? I figure reducing load on the alternator for other items + no resistor heat dissipation to worry about would be a decent benefit for the 6V/10V modes. 

24 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Massive thread necro here but has anyone considered doing a complete revamp of the FPCM to use a buck converter instead of just increasing the ground resistance? I figure reducing load on the alternator for other items + no resistor heat dissipation to worry about would be a decent benefit for the 6V/10V modes. 

Would this not describe just about all the aftermarket variable speed fuel pump controllers out there?

1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

Would this not describe just about all the aftermarket variable speed fuel pump controllers out there?

Pretty sure, yes. PWMing a brushed motor is effectively equivalent to a buck converter.

I think the goal would be to fit the controller into the stock housing + stock harness though. And uprate the power transistors to handle 70-80A.

I'm not sure there's an advantage to retaining 20-30 yo wiring and plugs and trying to desolder them from the old module and build them onto your new board and be constrained by them needing to be in the same place to poke out through the same holes in the casing.....when some new decent connectors and a proper extruded alloy housing to screw the MOSFETs onto and freedom to lay the board out the way it needs to sound like things worth having.

Just PWM it using 100amp SSRs, because they're high current ones you won't need a heatsink, unless you're running multiple pumps off each SSR.

(Assuming you have a capable ECU). The FPCM is garbage, as it's just a BS drop resistor, which is located next to the aerial on R33. 

I'm a little bothered by the suggestion of PWM through SSRs.

Conventionally when doing PWM you use a fixed frequency, something in the order of 500Hz would be common** for simple DC power control. You then vary the width of the pulses to control the delivered "power". But that means that the SSR is literally switching on and off at 500Hz (unless you get it to either 0% or 100% ends of the PWM). And AFAIK, SSRs are not meant to be switched that fast.

Anything high power PWM just sounds to me like the output side should be actual MOSFETs (or other transistory devices that like being switched fast) not SSRs that, whilst they may have MOSFETs inside, don't necessarily like being driven that fast.

You look at any circuit designs for high power DC PWM and you don't see any SSRs. You see FETs. Lots of FETs.

 

**but obviously other PWM applications might like to run at many kHz, and AC PWM control should either be implemented at the same frequency as the supply, or some lower frequency with careful controls in place to prevent DC draw on the mains supply from halfwave switching etc.

 

I've got it set at 100hz though, seems to work well :)

Had it set at 200hz and everything made an odd hum. The Jaycar SSRs are rated at 0.5ms switch time, so apply some maths and that's smack bang at the 500hz you've mentioned. 

Honestly never looked further than the SSRs, because if modern cars use them to control massive fans and electronic water pumps, then controlling a fuel pump surely should work?

*disclaimer, I am no means an engineer, just have an interest about science and excelled at it in high school. I actually work in IT lol.

2 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

because if modern cars use them to control massive fans and electronic water pumps, then controlling a fuel pump surely should work?

Yeah, but I think there's a difference between using them as relays and just simply switching the big loads on and off at normal rates, vs. banging them on and off hundreds of times per second.

I think the Jaycar SSR switching rate that you mention is not "you can drive it this fast". I think it is "It will change output state this fast after you change the input state".

Are you insinuating they might arc to death? I did have that suspicion too hence I'm running 2x SSRs, one for each 460L Wallahbro pump. Each of the SSRs are rated at 100amp (max load that is) however I'm assuming each pump would only drain a theoretic max of approx. 20amp at the fuel pressure I intent to run them at.

F90000267_Specs.jpg.f9094c4d0baa80d7a1a96d7a0cdeb965.jpg

 

A SSR cannot "arc" as part of normal operation.

Without an oscilloscope, you can't characterise any particular SSR, except trusting the datasheet. Or trust the ebay listing details - lol.

From memory, I was able to use those cheap fotek ones up to switching a 1kHz square wave. But I've never used them in anything critical like a fuel pump.

The problem with switching frequency is that you increase the time spent in a transition region between on and off states, where the power dissipated in the switching element is the product of the current and voltage across the device. Eventually it reaches a frequency where the device is floating in a partially on state - which is bad news.

I doubt any ECUs take the PWM frequency that high though, they only seem to go to a few hundred Hz tops, and it should be adjustable.

Also be sure that you SSR is legit. From memory a youtube creator called Big Clive did a tear down of one, only to find a measly 10-15amp rated  TRIAC as the switching element.

Anyway, an oscilloscope is the tool to measure this stuff.

  • Like 1
7 minutes ago, zoomzoom said:

A SSR cannot "arc" as part of normal operation.

Yeah, I was gunna say this. I'm not sure what the path to failure would look like for a mistreated SSR. As zoomzoom says above, when they float between on and off they consume a lot of power themselves and will get hot, which could fail gracefully..... or in a fire. I also don't know how much abuse (intensity &/or duration) they can cop. Arguably, switching them at hundreds of Hz for many hours is an enormous number of state changes. 2000 hours at 100Hz is 720 million state changes. It's probably OK.....but it sounds like it adds up quick. It would take a few years of commuting to get 2000 hours. 2000 hours of track use would either come much sooner or never, depending on the type of track usage. A truck would do 2000 hours in ~6 months.

I'm not shitcanning the idea, just mentioning that I think it is not the way that they are intended to be used.

  • Like 1

Might have to go back to the drawing board now with what you guys have mentioned :(

Thought I was being smart by not staging pumps (Not my cup of tea because you get pressure spikes as pumps come online). Not visible on a gauge but definitely visible when you run fuel pressure sensors.

From what I gather I should just bin the whole fuel pumps running on PWM and just have them full noise with a massive fuel cooler to manage heat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...