Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its rare a new driver joins a team, new engineers etc and matches a good-great team mate. For years we have seen Kimi struggle with how he needs the car. When its to his liking he is mega. But needs the feeling of the car. Something it took a while to achieve at Lotus too.

He is priving to be more Button and a Trulli and less Hamo, Alonso who can drive around any problem.

The back half of the year will be more telling once the car has had time to be developed and tweaked for him. The brake by wire has certainly removed some intimacy from the feeling a driver gets.

Wow an argument and someone else is wrong. Amazing

You know it's ok to be wrong once in a while. Accept that things aren't always as black and white as they appear. Driving style is not something easily changed and considering Alonso has been at Ferrari for over 5 years now it's hardly surprising the car suits him more

what argument? I see a discussion with a couple of different points of veiw... so I'm not sure how you work out who's right and wrong, but the results speak for themselves.

Alonso's years at Ferrari don't count for much when the entire chassis and driveline are completely new this season. It's not like they've spent the last 5 years tuning this car to his liking. They both started at square one this season. Can't get a fairer basis for comparison than that. And like it or lump it, drivers will always be compared to their team-mate, it's the best yardstick you've got. It's always been that way.

Kimi is one of the most experienced drivers in the field, an ex world champ, and used to be touted as one of the most naturally gifted guys on the grid. He used to be fast in whatever he put his arse into. That's not the case anymore. And Ferrari certainly expected him to be hassling Alonso - that was why they brought him in.

Even RBR said they were prepared to give Dan 4 or 5 races to get on the pace. 8 races is more than enough to form an opinion I reckon.

My prediction is that Kimi fans will have to continue making excuses for the rest of this season... and next. If Ferrari don't dump him again!

Edited by hrd-hr30

I think Kimi is suffering from the same issues as Vettel. Their driving style simply doesn't suit the current reg cars. That plays a big part in how well they can drive the car. Vettel especially is used to a car with uber downforce (compared to dan who came from a car with less downforce and grip), so his ability to just turn it in at high speed and just rely on the car to grip and go just isn't helping. He's having to drastically alter his style. Just look at how much the cars move around this year. They're using more opposite lock in the dry than they used to use in the wet. But having said all that, kimi certainly isn't getting hosed by Alonso everytime. Yes he's getting beaten, but on about half of the races he's only been a place or 2 behind.

As for rbr doing so well in the constructors championship, Dan has won a race and been at the pointy end all season. And when Vettel has actually finished he's been up there too (Dan's had 3 podiums, seb has had 2). Williams is the only other team (other than mercedes obviously) to have more than 1 podium, and they only have 2. For a team severely lacking straight line speed, rbr are doing pretty bloody well.

I think Kimi is suffering from the same issues as Vettel. Their driving style simply doesn't suit the current reg cars. That plays a big part in how well they can drive the car. Vettel especially is used to a car with uber downforce (compared to dan who came from a car with less downforce and grip), so his ability to just turn it in at high speed and just rely on the car to grip and go just isn't helping. He's having to drastically alter his style. Just look at how much the cars move around this year. They're using more opposite lock in the dry than they used to use in the wet. But having said all that, kimi certainly isn't getting hosed by Alonso everytime. Yes he's getting beaten, but on about half of the races he's only been a place or 2 behind.

As for rbr doing so well in the constructors championship, Dan has won a race and been at the pointy end all season. And when Vettel has actually finished he's been up there too (Dan's had 3 podiums, seb has had 2). Williams is the only other team (other than mercedes obviously) to have more than 1 podium, and they only have 2. For a team severely lacking straight line speed, rbr are doing pretty bloody well.

do you mean mclaren has more than one? didnt button and magnussen finish on the podium in melb, after dans dq.

and massa hasnt had a podium and that was bottas' first

The other thing to consider is like Vettel Kimi has had the bulk of car problems at Ferrari. No doubt he isnt where he wants to be but not sure after being hit by McLarens, car faults week in week out....I think I need a cleaner bucnh of races to actually guage how much behind Kimi is.

Not to make excuses for the guy, but to actually try to read the relative performance differences between the two. One think Kimi has seemed to struggle with, even alongside Romain is his qualifying. No doubt in the past when he could rag on the car he was rather epic. These days where you have to be a car whisperer and you dirve in a performance window I think guys like Kimi will lose out to the guys who are given a quick car and told to drive it at 9.8/10s every lap.

I think Kimi is suffering from the same issues as Vettel. Their driving style simply doesn't suit the current reg cars. That plays a big part in how well they can drive the car. Vettel especially is used to a car with uber downforce (compared to dan who came from a car with less downforce and grip), so his ability to just turn it in at high speed and just rely on the car to grip and go just isn't helping. He's having to drastically alter his style. Just look at how much the cars move around this year. They're using more opposite lock in the dry than they used to use in the wet.

Kimi's rallying experience should stand him in good stead then. A Finn who isn't comfortable with a car moving around under him, should be ashamed of himself - he really must be past his best! :P

But having said all that, kimi certainly isn't getting hosed by Alonso everytime. Yes he's getting beaten, but on about half of the races he's only been a place or 2 behind.

2 is not about half of 8...

post-15659-0-25006100-1403652828_thumb.jpg

Edited by hrd-hr30

Not to make excuses for the guy, but to actually try to read the relative performance differences between the two. One think Kimi has seemed to struggle with, even alongside Romain is his qualifying. No doubt in the past when he could rag on the car he was rather epic. These days where you have to be a car whisperer and you dirve in a performance window I think guys like Kimi will lose out to the guys who are given a quick car and told to drive it at 9.8/10s every lap.

The last couple of years the drivers were certainly complaining they had to manage thier tyres over the course of a qualy lap otherwise they could go off before you finished a single lap, but this years tyres are 10x more robust and that just isn't a problem. In Qualy they are ragging on the cars more than they have since Pirelli came into F1 - the cars have less downforce than ever in the modern era and they have to throw them around in qualifying and the races to an extent, as mad082 said. They even get an extra set of tyres to burn up in Q3! I didn't see many guys going 9.8/10ths in qualy at Spielberg - there were lockups, spins, and people running off the track all over the place!

And as you say, Kimi struggled in qualy in the Lotus as well, but his strength was managing the tyres during the race driving to a performance window, particularly on the hottest tracks where the Lotus was the best car at being gentle on the Failrellis of degredation.

Edited by hrd-hr30

In other news. Villeneuve must be stupid saying Red Bull have given up on Vettel and are now focusing on Dan

If you've had a driver bring you 4 world titles, you don't abandon him when he has a rough start to the season

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/3213/9359896/Vettel-should-go-to-Ferrari-Villeneuve

I can't believe the so called best driver(s) in the world can say a car isn't suited to their style, the world's best should be able to adapt. Doesn't compare well to the likes of Brabham, Clarke, Moss etc does it.

I think its not so much they can't adapt, its just they haven't been able to do it as quick as guys coming from worse cars or categories that are used to the cars sliding around. The gaps are less than a Second, probably less than half a second really. If you or me jumped in the car we would probably be 3 seconds slower

Without being in the situation there is no real perspective on how hard/long it takes to adapt to the new style cars.

Back in the day there was alot less aero, so the cars I dare say would have been more predictable even though they were all over the place. With aero you have to remember that air going over the car can make the thing very unpredictable/touchy

Also, I don't think there were any testing restrictions in the era you are talking about so the guys were able to bolt something on there car then go out and try it. At the moment, if the car is not right then you realistically only have half of Friday to try new things before starting race Sims and setup for qually etc

Someone rates themselves VERY highly. I guarantee you WOULD NOT be anywhere near within 3 seconds of their times.

Jeze, it was just a number I picked out of the blue.

Didn't excatly sit down and think about how much slower than the drivers I would be

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
×
×
  • Create New...