Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I think you might be surprised as to how much difference there is between the two gearboxes. Don't forget the S15 has a turbo, so the torque output is pretty high.

Nevertheless, I would vote for the Z car box over the S15 box. I mean, people with S15s were famously replacing the 6 speeders with 5 speeders because the little SR20 5 speeder was stronger.

I think you might be surprised as to how much difference there is between the two gearboxes. Don't forget the S15 has a turbo, so the torque output is pretty high.

Nevertheless, I would vote for the Z car box over the S15 box. I mean, people with S15s were famously replacing the 6 speeders with 5 speeders because the little SR20 5 speeder was stronger.

Maybe, I am not really familiar with the s15 boxes. But my observations have always been that gearboxes suffer the most stress and damage when they are suddenly shocked with lots of torque in a small space of time. The sr20 engine doesn't really fit into this category, even with a turbo. Sure torque output on an turbo s15 can be high, but its usually up high and once the clutch engages and everything starts building momentum the stress on components is much more linear and manageable.

Driving like an idiot is not accounted for of-course. That's why you get lots of broken drive train components and mounts because people are dumping the clutch on wide after-market wheels with grippy tires and high output engines on cars that were never designed to handle that kind of abuse.

Edited by sonicz

Will a 350z box Bolton the R34gtt though also are they any stronger than Rb25 boxes. Could be a good mod for economy and possibly higher speeds.

And no it won't bolt on. Assuming that they are common with the big frame Nissan 5 speeders (big assumption, almost certainly wrong), you have to build up a box using appropriate front and rear halves. Otherwise you're into the territory of using adapter plates. I'm pretty sure that this is how it has to be done. Plenty of VQ into R chassis conversions using the original R chassis gearbox have been documented with adapter plates, and I don't think I've ever heard of someone Frankensteining two halves of the different gearboxes together.

Frankensteining can be done with VG gearboxes, because only the bellhousing half of the box is different.

  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...