Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Simple... A small electric syphon pump. I considered going that way too until I realised a syphon works fine on a Y fitting inside the tank if your return has a high flow rate.

Any serious track car is probably running an under car surge tank too, keeps the fumes, fuel and danger out of the boot.

Simple... A small electric syphon pump. I considered going that way too until I realised a syphon works fine on a Y fitting inside the tank if your return has a high flow rate.

Any serious track car is probably running an under car surge tank too, keeps the fumes, fuel and danger out of the boot.

While that's probably an easy option, the cars in question I'm talking about (4 I know of), all run the same setup and don't have a jet/syphon pump. They run twin in tank pumps with a custom top hat that has two fuel lines running all the way to the fuel rail. All have been tracked and all have gotten low tanks and zero issues with surging / running out of fuel. Does this Jet Pump really work as well as we think it does?

I have an under car surge, 2 044s at near on full snot and it returns from the surge through the factory return. This set up at 13.8v should support over 1000hp on race gas qnd come bloody close on corn juice. It is fed from the stock location pump. It works because 1000's of people before us have developed systems and they're trial and error is well documented. Don't need to reinvent the wheel.

Does this Jet Pump really work as well as we think it does?

With an entirely in tank setup, if you try and push too much fuel through the syphon jet it will not work properly or at all.

Not to mention your fuel pressure goes out of control due to back pressure in the return line.

I'm using a pump jet on one side of a Y fitting inside the tank.

How well does it work? Well with the tank on empty and running both pumps, it was back to 1/4 after about 1-2 minutes of pump operation.

I have an under car surge, 2 044s at near on full snot and it returns from the surge through the factory return. This set up at 13.8v should support over 1000hp on race gas qnd come bloody close on corn juice. It is fed from the stock location pump. It works because 1000's of people before us have developed systems and they're trial and error is well documented. Don't need to reinvent the wheel.

One problem, the 044's don't last on E85.

  • Like 1

Been through 6 in total.

First failure was the primary pump got lazy. The secondary covered it when it come online. Picked it up by a fuel pressure gauge and AFR gauge.

Replaced both...

Second set,same thing.

Third set, can't really remember... But enough to crack it and throw it all in the bin.

044's DO NOT last under E85 conditions. If you don't have gauges and running them, you're asking for trouble.

  • 2 weeks later...

Had a bad issue with high fuel pressure in my gt four with a Walbro e85 pump. My factory fuel return hose had a restrictor in it (scottynm35 has seen one in a S15 before). This was an R34 RB25DE model, I now have a Stagea DET engine in it.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

So did anyone end up using the Holley dominators?

What's the general consensus on a fuel system e85 compatible that will handle 450-500kw in a 32 Gtr. I wanna do it once and do it properly.

I've been advised to go a Holley dominator from the tuner, he said we can stage the pumps and run a sensor from the ecu to keep an eye on fuel flow. They have installed a few and he seems to like them but there is no long term usage at this stage.

The car currently has a nismo intank. Will be looking for a new pump to match with the new 1550 xpurts I will be getting.

So did anyone end up using the Holley dominators?

What's the general consensus on a fuel system e85 compatible that will handle 450-500kw in a 32 Gtr. I wanna do it once and do it properly.

I've been advised to go a Holley dominator from the tuner, he said we can stage the pumps and run a sensor from the ecu to keep an eye on fuel flow. They have installed a few and he seems to like them but there is no long term usage at this stage.

The car currently has a nismo intank. Will be looking for a new pump to match with the new 1550 xpurts I will be getting.

Stay away from the Holley dominator - They have had a high failure rate.

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys,

I finally replaced my OEM in tank lift pump with a walbro 460ltr in tank. Quiet as a mouse :)

Had it on the dyno and we couldn't tune it with more than 15psi...as the boost increases and demands more fuel pressure - the fuel pressure was dropping off.

I am still running the OEM wiring harness with the added relay, however, as the pump draws up to 20amps, I was told that I need to run a thicker gauge wire direct from the battery to achieve 14v at full load.

My question is this (btw, it's an r32 gtr)...can I run the thicker gauge wire to the top of the 'top hat' on the fuel tank (i.e. direct to the Anderson plug) OR do I also need to replace the wiring between the fuel pump itself and the underside of the top hat? From memory, the underside of the top hat also runs an Anderson plug. Has anyone else running a walbro experienced similar voltage issues to myself? From memory, SIR RB runs a walbro in tank as well.

I'll also replace the fuel filter in the engine bay for piece of mind as this may be a catayst to drop in fuel pressure.

Have a 32 gtr and just replaced a walbro 255lph pump with a walbro 460. I also rewired the pump with 8 gauge wiring.

Previous pump on stock wiring was getting 8.8v on idle. New pump and rewire and now getting 13.3v at idle.

 

Walbro site has a table on voltages and lph rates. Interesting to look at. 

 

The pump shouldnt be dropping pressure. You either have a leak or a faulty fuel reg

 

  • Like 1

Thanks for the feedback. Did you run 8 gauge to the top hat only (on top of the fuel tank) or did u go direct to the fuel pump? 

If I'm not getting the voltage I need, the fuel pressure will not be up for the task and this is what I am experiencing. My tuner is certain that this is the issue. My fuel reg was fine with my previous setup (i.e. OEM lift pump with external 044 which ran power direct from batt) so I don't think it's the fuel reg.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...