Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Like anything in the car world, theres always pro and cons. So what's the cons of using procam 260 10.8mm Vs. poncam 260 9.15mm ?? I believe OP and I want quicker spool so we should both go for 260 and higher lift possible for best gain.

Since both OP and I have to rebuild the head, I guess the difference in fitting these procam Vs poncam is negligible no ?

Poncam is suppose to boltin with no mods, suppose to lol

The procam will require new buckets - shims and the head to be "relieved" for lobe clearance

Look at contacting Unigroup Engineering for their 260 x 10.8, as much as their the same specs the UE ones open a lot faster therefore are peak open longer, will require new shims and head to be "relieved" for the lobes

I went from 260 to 250 poncams and would never use 260s again, 250s spool the turbos so much sooner and give more "drive" everywhere

Should add anything with more then 9.2mm lift will require better springs too

My 272 10.8 cams go alright hahaha

Still very responsive with my baby -9s

I would really like to see what happens if you where ever to put the UE 260 x 10.8mm cams in, those poor -9s would drop their bearings :P

Lift=power, duration=when

Please don't spread that... the reason for longer duration is not 'when', it just happens to be a consequence of longer duration.

Should add anything with more then 9.2mm lift will require better springs too

I would really like to see what happens if you where ever to put the UE 260 x 10.8mm cams in, those poor -9s would drop their bearings :P

Haha I know was considering it

But might be too aggressive for them

Going to bump the compression up when I get around to fixing my car

Please don't spread that... the reason for longer duration is not 'when', it just happens to be a consequence of longer duration.

so in other words it's decides when it going to make the power

so in other words it's decides when it going to make the power

What I meant by my comment was the reason why people choose camshafts with longer duration is not because they want to make power later in the rpm range, that is just a consequence of a multiple of engine changes. As I said before, if you have low exhaust manifold back pressure relative to boost pressure (and this is usually in a high rpm engine ith big turbo that won't make a lot of power below 4000rpm... as an example), then you can choose longer duration camshafts to take advantage of scavenging effects during camshaft overlap.

XKALABA's result with going from 260 to 250 is not an accident, it makes total sense as he has factory mounted twin turbochargers that have high back pressure relative to boost pressure.

One example is on post #19 of this thread: http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/93880-rb26-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/

He makes 17 more KW and greater power everywhere in the curve from just changing cam timing...seems like a lot of power increase from rotating cams and from what I read most people don't move them more than a few degrees apart.

In the list of durations of "bolt in" cams there is clearly more than just 4 degrees of cam timing changes going on and it's leading me to believe that there should be more room in there even on the smaller turbos that I will be running to gain some response from changing out the factory cams and likely even more response when I get them timed right on the dyno.

Yeah but who is to say the cam timing was 100% set-up in the first place? If it was out, then very easy to get a gain like that :)

Really as the other guys have said - you are putting -7s on a 2.9ltr. Putting cams in, is a waste of time.

Your power band will be from 3000rpm-6500rpm regardless of what you do because the turbos will run out of airflow, as they run out around 7000rpm on a 2.6ltr. Hell it might even come on before 3000rpm... Not too many have gone and put such small turbos on a 2.9ltr, in fact I don't think anyone has.

Yeah but who is to say the cam timing was 100% set-up in the first place? If it was out, then very easy to get a gain like that :)

Really as the other guys have said - you are putting -7s on a 2.9ltr. Putting cams in, is a waste of time.

Your power band will be from 3000rpm-6500rpm regardless of what you do because the turbos will run out of airflow, as they run out around 7000rpm on a 2.6ltr. Hell it might even come on before 3000rpm... Not too many have gone and put such small turbos on a 2.9ltr, in fact I don't think anyone has.

...and you will choke the restrictive exhaust side.

Poncam is suppose to boltin with no mods, suppose to lol

The procam will require new buckets - shims and the head to be "relieved" for lobe clearance

Look at contacting Unigroup Engineering for their 260 x 10.8, as much as their the same specs the UE ones open a lot faster therefore are peak open longer, will require new shims and head to be "relieved" for the lobes

I went from 260 to 250 poncams and would never use 260s again, 250s spool the turbos so much sooner and give more "drive" everywhere

hmmm, ok so taking all comments in this thread on board. I have -7's on stock RB26. Suprisingly the boost curve is quite laggy compared to stock (which is the opposite of what people say about -7's). Makes positive pressure below 3000, but I dont get full boost - 18psi until 4750-5000rpm ish. I was thinking Poncam 260 9.15mm lift to help bring on boost quicker and extract more torque early in the rev range.

I am now tossing up between Type R 250 9.15 due to some of the comments above.

Which makes more sense for my needs?

Stock cams on a 2.6 with -7s is best by far, i got my car with 260s and went back to 250s cause i couldnt find the stock cams :(, you need to get it on the dyno and dial the cam timing to get response, advance intake and retard exhaust

The result I got from the two cams where in my 34 when it was still a 2.6 with -7s, there is a dyno sheet here somewhere when it was last tuned with that setup and it would make positive pressure below 2k and usable boost in the mid 2k range ( in 5th cause 1:1 ratio ) and run 19psi to the 8200redline

What is your setup/mods and who tunes it ?

hmmm, ok so taking all comments in this thread on board. I have -7's on stock RB26. Suprisingly the boost curve is quite laggy compared to stock (which is the opposite of what people say about -7's). Makes positive pressure below 3000, but I dont get full boost - 18psi until 4750-5000rpm ish. I was thinking Poncam 260 9.15mm lift to help bring on boost quicker and extract more torque early in the rev range.

I am now tossing up between Type R 250 9.15 due to some of the comments above.

Which makes more sense for my needs?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
×
×
  • Create New...