Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I was told when I purchased my car that it made 314kw however when it was recently dynod it only made 280kw at all 4. I'd like to think it did intact make 314 kW but in rwd.

My question is how much of a power difference can you expect between an awd dyno run and a rwd dyno run? I've heard numbers like 12-15% thrown around but I'm wondering if anyone has actual figures from their own experience.

Thanks in advance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/451423-r32-gtr-drivetrain-losses-awd-v-rwd/
Share on other sites

This has been discussed numerous times on sau man.

The rb26 gtr is a majority rear wheel drive car. It's Not like a evo or wrx where the car has a exact percentage split front to back.

I have seen people dyno their car in awd and then rwd in a gtr and the reading was marginally different.

That being said, different dynos tell different stories. And how the tuner sets it all up.

Plus, the majority of the losses are not in the drivetrain - they occur at the tyre/roller interface. As mentioned above, the GTR's AWD characteristics make it very difficult to work out whether the effect of having 4 places to lose power (through roller slip) is more significant than spreading the power delivery around to 4 places so you actually get less slip.

Yeah fair enough. My car was dynod on a hub dyno when it made 280kw, so you'd think with tyre slip out of the equation it would actually make more power.

Was hoping to see some dyno graphs of someone doing a rwd run then awd run back to back. But I understand what you're saying about it being different to a evo style awd

Edited by redot

Why would anyone bother doing back to back comparisons?

A dyno is a tuning tool. Make as much power as possible on the dyno it's on when being tuned. Comparing dyno readings will end in tears.

You mod a car to make power so it goes faster, not for a line on a page.

  • Like 2

Yeah fair enough. My car was dynod on a hub dyno when it made 280kw, so you'd think with tyre slip out of the equation it would actually make more power.

A hub dyno doesn't require any downforce on the rear axle. If you strap a car down hard to get grip on rollers you lose many powerz. More power the more it needs to be strapped down.

You can see why hub dyno's are prefered...

Yeah I was just curious to see if there was a difference on paper between awd/rwd irrespective of tuning...

Rb26 forged, gt3582r, 850cc injectors, power fc dejetro, pulp, 14psi

Car made 354kw on 20psi at all 4 after the tune

Actually in the interests of science Shred Industries Performance did this test on an R32 GTR in 2011 and got 200.6KW and 189.7KW.

Don't know what kind of dyno - was a Dynapack but don't know if rollers or hub.

I have the chart if anyone is really keen to see it.

post-49463-0-55700700-1417823425_thumb.jpg

Actually in the interests of science Shred Industries Performance did this test on an R32 GTR in 2011 and got 200.6KW and 189.7KW.

Don't know what kind of dyno - was a Dynapack but don't know if rollers or hub.

I have the chart if anyone is really keen to see it.

Awesome mate, thanks for that! Yeah I would love a look

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...