Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Out of curiosity I decided to calculate the actual performance difference between a R32 GTS-t and R34 GT-T.

One with the RB20DET, and one with a RB25DET NEO.

I decided to share my work if anyone was interested in knowing the actual power/weight ratio of these cars.

I am calculating using the coupe (Type M for the R32) variants, with manual transmission.

For the R32, we are calculating using the zenki which is slightly lighter but not by much

Standard figures are 1280kg @ 215PS for the HCR32,

and 1410kg @ 280ps for the ER34.

Here's the results:

Stock:
R32 GTS-t = 5.95kg/ps
R34 GT-T = 5.03kg/ps

Stage 2 mods:
R32 GTS-t @ 220rwkw = 3.62kg/ps
R34 GT-T @ 250rwkw = 3.55kg/ps

More mods:

R32 GTS-t @ 240rwkw = 3.36kg/ps
R34 GT-T @ 270rwkw = 3.29kg/ps

Tons of mods:

R32 @ 260kw = 3.10

R34 @ 300kw = 2.97

As you can see from the results, the difference is quite significant in stock form, which makes sense because the RB25 has that extra displacement in addition to a bigger turbo. However, once both cars are modified, the difference is quite insignificant until you get past the limits of the RB20.

Edited by Matvei27

LOL.

seriously?

Dude no.

No.

If it makes you feel better here's how it looks with heavy mods:

R32 @ 260kw = 3.10

R34 @ 300kw = 2.97

The R34 outperforms the R32 in stock and heavily modified forms, but in between they are quite similar at least according to the numbers.

I'm not making shit up. I'm comparing the data on the two cars. That doesn't mean *real world* performance will be the same, but that's subjective. The only way to objectively compare the two cars is with math, unless you have some better idea.

Cmon. You telling me that 270 rwkw is the max safe power of a neo. You're cooked. What are you basing that on?

If what you are saying is true, why aren't rb20 r32s more popular?

Cmon. You telling me that 270 rwkw is the max safe power of a neo. You're cooked. What are you basing that on?

If what you are saying is true, why aren't rb20 r32s more popular?

I mean for daily driving. People regularly get 300+kw out of them, but remember the RB25 is slightly less reliable. I included the figures for 260/300 as well for those with more mods.

And as I said above you *will* begin to see a difference at 260/300kw between the two cars. The difference is in stock form and in heavily modified form. Just not in between the two endpoints, apparently.

They're not popular because you have to spend more money to get the same gains that you could get easily from a RB25.

Clearly if you intend to go beyond 260/300kw on either engine you are going to be better off with the RB25.

But if you don't, I'm not sure there's going to be too much of a difference.

Edited by Matvei27

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thought is if you were just moving it forward and the upstream geometry remained the same, then no difference at all. But because the current one has the filter direct into the AFM inlet, you effectively have the best chance of a completely symmetric air flow profile upstream, and in, the AFM, whilst the aftermarket inlet thingo has a (small, to be sure) bend between the filter and the AFM. That would bias the flow to the outside of the bend (downstream of the bend) which might well reduce the size of the signal seen by the AFM, for the same total flow rate. Having said that: If you're proposing to make your inlet look like a hybrid of your existing one and the aftermarket one, such that there is no bend where the filter is clamped on... then I say it will be just fine. If there is going to be such a bend, then, if you can align the insertion of the AFM blade such that it is at right angles to the plane of the bend, then there is a better than even chance that the centreline velocity where the blade is will remain more or less the same, and the velocity will just be a little faster to the outside of that, and just a little slower to the inside. **This is not professional investment advice and you should consult a suitably qualified ouija board, tea leaves or the intestines of a goat for more accurate prognostication.
    • Hi Tao, Thanks for your reply.  It's been a while and I managed to get the valve stem seals replaced with the head on the car.  Unfortunately this didn't solve my issue, the car still smokes a lot after idling (to be honest during idle you can see a bit of blue smoke from the exhaust), same after deceleration. I will try disconnecting the valve cover breathers, do I leave the PCV valve in? By engine oil drain pipe, do you mean the turbo oil drain?
    • What about if you just give it direct 12v and earth?
    • Hi guys . Can someone help me  I bought an Android screen for my Nissan fuga but it won't turn on   
    • My guesstimate, with no real numbers to back it up, is it won't effect it greatly at all.its not a huge change in position, and I can't see the air flow changing from in turbulence that much based on distance, and what's in front of it. Johnny and Brad may have some more numbers to share from experience though.
×
×
  • Create New...