Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Buy a 1989 nothing model, by that logic.

I am going to guess your after something more collectible and rare by the sound of this question.

In which case the ADM poops all over the nismo

Is this a survey question as a matter of interest? Or are you actually interested in buying one?

I personally would go with the Nismo out of those two. The Nismo is not actually that different to the stock GTR. They made a few slight changes, including full Nismo body kit (front bonnet lip, front bumper vents, Nismo sideskirts and Nismo Back boot lip), No rear windscreen wiper, no ABS and no AC as per standard. They also included slightly larger turbos (which are laggy and too large to be efficient at 0.8 bar). These were mostly to modify the aerodynamics of the R32 GTR for Homologation for Grp A racing. Grp A cars were not supposed to look the same as the factory car, which included spoiler kits etc. In stock form, the Nismos were not really any faster than standard R32 GTRs.(See youtube below)

However, in saying all of this, everyone knows that the Nismo is the base for such historically classic race cars as the Calsonic GTR etc. Even though the Nismo has more units produced than the ADM, 500 (plus 60 odd that went directly to grp A teams) vs 100 for the ADM, internationally the demand for Nismos will outstrip the ADM 1000:1. So that should mean that the number of buyers competing for the few Nismos remaining ( I assume that many of them have been raced and crashed), should always mean that the Nismos command a higher purchase price.

As im a kiwi and not Australian, i have no real interest in the ADMs at all, so maybe i am bias. Aussies will have to jump in here and give their points of view too.

Possibly a better question is ADM vs Nismo vs N1?

N1s only had 228 units produced, vs the 500 (plus 60) Nismos, vs the 100 for the ADMs. Unlike the Nismos (Group A), the N1s were for Group N endurance racing (off the show room floor racing). In the early 90s, Group N racing in Japan was very similar to Bathurst in the early 70s. You buy a car from a manufacturer, make very limited mods (tyres, brakes, suspension, exhaust and computer i believe) and then race it! So the GTR N1 was a semi prepped race car from Nissan. So the chassis is more rigid, engine built by hand, bigger turbos, lighter everything etc. Of the 228 R32 N1s Built, they can be split into 3, N1, V Spec N1 and V Spec II N1. To be honest i am not 100% sure of the exact break down in terms of quantity, but i believe that most of them were the initial N1 spec and the V Spec N1 and V Spec II N1 number approximately 50 each.

From what i can tell from my general observations, N1s sell for approximately 25-30% more than Nismos in Japan. This is simply my general observations over the last 3 years. It is very hard to work out accurately with such a small number coming up for sale and condition varying so much.

So in my mind, the wish list order in terms of both value and desirability for an Australian wanting to buy an R32 GTR should go like this (all things remaining equal)

1 - V Spec II N1

2 - V Spec N1

3 - N1

4 - Nismo

5 - ADM

6 - V Spec II

7 - V Spec

8 - Stock GTR.

Of course this is just my opinion and everyone is different.

  • Like 2

Great reply thanks.

Ye I was looking at purchasing one or the other , and purely based on collectability atm ,but I'm not sure weather they are worth 10 or 30 grand more than a standard gtr or Tommy Kaira gtr ?

Obviously that is all an individual point of view. Most people would probably say that double the price for a car that is almost identical, with the main difference being a little blue chassis plate, is probably not worth it. However then you get people like myself, that willing to pay 3 x as much or more for that different little blue build plate, just to say i have an N1! I would say that all bar the Tommy Kaira is a good investment. I cant see too many people demanding Tommy Kaira's with too much enthusiasm.

An N1, Nismo or ADM will all be solid investments and more importantly great cars with which you will be proud to drive.

The ADM will, in this country, always out strip the Nismo version. Prior to the 35 Australia was the only country Nissan exported the GTR directly too.

That being said I would dearly love an N1.

Is this a survey question as a matter of interest? Or are you actually interested in buying one?

I personally would go with the Nismo out of those two. The Nismo is not actually that different to the stock GTR. They made a few slight changes, including full Nismo body kit (front bonnet lip, front bumper vents, Nismo sideskirts and Nismo Back boot lip), No rear windscreen wiper, no ABS and no AC as per standard. They also included slightly larger turbos (which are laggy and too large to be efficient at 0.8 bar). These were mostly to modify the aerodynamics of the R32 GTR for Homologation for Grp A racing. Grp A cars were not supposed to look the same as the factory car, which included spoiler kits etc. In stock form, the Nismos were not really any faster than standard R32 GTRs.(See youtube below)

However, in saying all of this, everyone knows that the Nismo is the base for such historically classic race cars as the Calsonic GTR etc. Even though the Nismo has more units produced than the ADM, 500 (plus 60 odd that went directly to grp A teams) vs 100 for the ADM, internationally the demand for Nismos will outstrip the ADM 1000:1. So that should mean that the number of buyers competing for the few Nismos remaining ( I assume that many of them have been raced and crashed), should always mean that the Nismos command a higher purchase price.

As im a kiwi and not Australian, i have no real interest in the ADMs at all, so maybe i am bias. Aussies will have to jump in here and give their points of view too.

Possibly a better question is ADM vs Nismo vs N1?

N1s only had 228 units produced, vs the 500 (plus 60) Nismos, vs the 100 for the ADMs. Unlike the Nismos (Group A), the N1s were for Group N endurance racing (off the show room floor racing). In the early 90s, Group N racing in Japan was very similar to Bathurst in the early 70s. You buy a car from a manufacturer, make very limited mods (tyres, brakes, suspension, exhaust and computer i believe) and then race it! So the GTR N1 was a semi prepped race car from Nissan. So the chassis is more rigid, engine built by hand, bigger turbos, lighter everything etc. Of the 228 R32 N1s Built, they can be split into 3, N1, V Spec N1 and V Spec II N1. To be honest i am not 100% sure of the exact break down in terms of quantity, but i believe that most of them were the initial N1 spec and the V Spec N1 and V Spec II N1 number approximately 50 each.

From what i can tell from my general observations, N1s sell for approximately 25-30% more than Nismos in Japan. This is simply my general observations over the last 3 years. It is very hard to work out accurately with such a small number coming up for sale and condition varying so much.

So in my mind, the wish list order in terms of both value and desirability for an Australian wanting to buy an R32 GTR should go like this (all things remaining equal)

1 - V Spec II N1

2 - V Spec N1

3 - N1

4 - Nismo

5 - ADM

6 - V Spec II

7 - V Spec

8 - Stock GTR.

Of course this is just my opinion and everyone is different.

Good reply indeed. In Australia, rankings #4 and #5 are likely to be switched, or equal.

On the world stage, yes, the Nismo model would be worth more than the ADM.

Projected Sums Insured by Aust. Insurance Companies should be in 2015 in Renewal terms...

(for top of the line specimens) around...

* V-Spec II N1 - $95,000

* V-Spec N1 - $88,000

* Non V-Spec N1 - $80,000

* Aust Delivered - $78,000 to $83,000

* Nismo - $75,000 to $85,000

* V-Spec II - $53,000

* V-Spec - $43,000

* Non V-Spec - $33,000

Mods in my opinion (depending on what they are) might only shift those values north by a small margin.

That'll be negotiated I'm sure between the owner and the company.

Good reply indeed. In Australia, rankings #4 and #5 are likely to be switched, or equal.

On the world stage, yes, the Nismo model would be worth more than the ADM.

Projected Sums Insured by Aust. Insurance Companies should be in 2015 in Renewal terms...

(for top of the line specimens) around...

* V-Spec II N1 - $95,000

* V-Spec N1 - $88,000

* Non V-Spec N1 - $80,000

* Aust Delivered - $78,000 to $83,000

* Nismo - $75,000 to $85,000

* V-Spec II - $53,000

* V-Spec - $43,000

* Non V-Spec - $33,000

Mods in my opinion (depending on what they are) might only shift those values north by a small margin.

That'll be negotiated I'm sure between the owner and the company.

That is a very interesting list Terry. Im sure you know alot more about the price of these in Australia than I do. Iron Chef may be able to help with this, but i would have thought that the price gap between N1s and Nismos in Japan, would have been mirrored or at least have some correlation with the price gap of N1s and Nismos in Australia. Again it is only my observation, but i would have thought that a Nismo would command around 25% less than a similar condition N1. Again this is only observation and also i may be bias :)

  • 2 weeks later...

This NISMO will be a good guide.

I'm trying to find out the sell price on this (If it sold).

http://www.j-spec.com.au/auction/SEVS/1990-Nissan-Skyline-5701471.html

Bob.

  • 5 weeks later...

So roughly what would a Nismo in good condition be worth in Aus

This car sold for the equivalent of approx. $50,000 landed complied and registered.

http://www.j-spec.com.au/auction/SEVS/1990-Nissan-Skyline-5701471.html

That's pretty much inline with an Australian Delivered R32 GT-R.

I'd say they are worth roughly the same money all things considered.

Bob.

post-78207-0-87424700-1428307553_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just trying to get my head around this. At 5psi of boost, you turn on your wmi pump, and then you're using a 3000cc injector, to allow flow upto the actual engine, where you have your 6x200cc injectors and a 500cc injector. If the above is correct, what advantage are you obtaining by having the 3000cc injector blocking flow, is this just incase a line breaks between that injector and the motor you can stop flow immediately? Or are the 6x200cc and 500cc less injectors and just spray nozzle?
    • Welcome! New member myself, but I had an R33 back in 2002. Best advice I could give, based on my experience: if you're running the factory turbo, be very conservative with boost. I made the mistake of just fiddling around with the boost controller and cranking the boost for fun, and the end result was my intake pipes popping off frequently from the constant deluge of oil that was being blown into the recirc by the stressed-out turbo, which itself was siphoning oil from the engine and farting it out both sides of its centre bearing (or something to that effect). If I could do it all again, I would have gotten a new turbo and had a tune dialled in professionally and then just left it alone! Funny you mention the metal shavings in the gearbox, as I had the same thing - the probe plug (magnetic drain plug, essentially) would come out caked with shavings. At least it was doing its job. Not sure if that's just sacrificial wear and part of the deal, or if my gearbox was shagged, but I wasn't abusing it. Enjoy the R33 - they're a dying breed, and if they weren't $35k+ on CarSales in Queensland, I might have picked up one of those again, instead of the 370GT I own now (though I'm loving the 370GT, that big 3.7L V6 just hits different).
    • Howdy folks. I owned an R33 back in 2002, which was thoroughly beyond my capacity (financially speaking) to maintain/insure, so we parted ways in 2004. Fast forward 21 years (to literally yesterday, in fact) and I'm now the proud owner of a 2007 V36 370GT. I'm happily surprised by how much power the VQ37VHR makes, compared to the RB25DET, considering the latter is turbocharged. I had planned to add a turbo at some point but I'm on the fence about whether I'll even need it (though I do love the sudden onset of extra torque). Any other 370GT owners around the traps, I'd love to hear about your experiences with this car (good and bad).
    • Perhaps the answer is... more jacks!* *proper jacks must be used.  
    • I NEVER think about using a scissor jack unless there is absolutely no other alternative. f**king things are dangerous, annoying and stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...