Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes but some how your SS2 is god like haha

I still don't understand how you managed to make 324kw on 16psi, it's just insane.

Depends which turbine wheel it has, Tao is using near GT35 sized wheels in the SS2 these days so I would expect it to flow well.

I went ATR45SAT from Stao - Supposed to perform well on restrictive systems. I ended up buying a different actuator though so I can get it down to lower boost pressures. The actuator that comes on it is a 20PSI one and I doubt the stock motor would be very happy with that.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Is there anybody who has tested/used the pwr r34 intercooler. I'ts also a return flow setup but i gues, that a brand like thid will not make something that will give flow restrictions, at least not at that price ...

This is the one I mean: https://www.pwr.com.au/wp-content/uploads/PWI2204-Skyline-R34-GTS.jpg

I went ATR45SAT from Stao - Supposed to perform well on restrictive systems. I ended up buying a different actuator though so I can get it down to lower boost pressures. The actuator that comes on it is a 20PSI one and I doubt the stock motor would be very happy with that.

stock motor loves boost (when fitted with proper head studs)

spent all Sunday abusing my car at Wakefield in 40 degree heat and then drove home. Motor still pumping on!

  • Like 2

Is there anybody who has tested/used the pwr r34 intercooler. I'ts also a return flow setup but i gues, that a brand like thid will not make something that will give flow restrictions, at least not at that price ...

This is the one I mean: https://www.pwr.com.au/wp-content/uploads/PWI2204-Skyline-R34-GTS.jpg

As I have said before, it does not matter how good the core is when the end tanks (well, mainly the return flow end) suck testes.

Nah, don't think that's the problem because a turn wil not let drop you pressure, the core himself gives a lot more resistance then a turn in a decent diameter could do. You see lots of people who fabricate there own return flow'ish piping with a 180 degree radius directly after the cooler, so that should give you the same issue then a turn Built in the end tank ... Not talking about the phenomen that the isue is mush bigger on a neo engine

Nah, don't think that's the problem because a turn wil not let drop you pressure, the core himself gives a lot more resistance then a turn in a decent diameter could do. You see lots of people who fabricate there own return flow'ish piping with a 180 degree radius directly after the cooler, so that should give you the same issue then a turn Built in the end tank ... Not talking about the phenomen that the isue is mush bigger on a neo engine

Hks made one with the 180 bend. I was going to make one and did a bit of work and was very easy to do. The only problem was it was either too low or it sat against the radiator.

I honestly can't see or have found a good explanation on why a return flow is a restriction.

I'd believe GTSBoy... But if you need more info. This page has more info than you could ever want on intercoolers.

http://www.are.com.au/techtalk/intecoolersMR.htm

My new intercooler is an ARE, given the information they've put together on that page, they clearly know what they're talking about.

Ok rhen you'll be kowinng what you're saying :-p

But i personaly don't see the the difference, can you explain why you're not having the same isue if you're fabricating a 180 degree turn directly after the end tank. Because of you look at the blitz, it's just like they have 'welded/extruded' the turn just after they bring the air together in the end tanks.

It's not so much the 180deg bend as it is that it turns on such a tight radius, if the 180deg bend was around a 300mm radius the issue wouldn't be so bad but most return flow intercoolers have the 180deg bend inside a 100mm radius which with air volume and velocity trying to get the air to change direction causes turbulance which creates a high pressure area inside the bend that restricts flow

A crap cooler core runner entry design will also add to the issue

Now I'm only a machine opertator so that might be wrong but that's my understanding of it

  • Like 2

^ This is pretty much it. It's not just the tight radius. At least with a bend to make the equivalent of a return flow cooler, it is made out of pipe, so has a smooth pipe to flow around the 180. The exit from a typical return flow tank is just shocking, basically just a 90° sharp corner off the end of the tank, and that's after the air has already had to turn 90° off the end of the tubes.

On top of that, the core is only ~75% the height of a full cooler because the return pipe either goes above or below the core. So you will run a higher pressure drop across the core itself at any given power level.

Don't get me wrong, I don't have a vendetta out against return flow coolers. I have one on my car and have done so since last century. Just pointing out that there are real reasons why they will hit the wall before a normal cooler will.

  • Like 2

One thing is sure, lot's of people refer to the shorter piping, but imho, if you make you're piping decent, like for instance a plazmaman piping kit, i don't think piping will be that much longer

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...