Educated Guess At The Final Tune Results

[Piggaz]

1434879965278.jpg

??

[Hadouken]

I think he was supporting you.

Anyway. Who cares about peak power. What I care about here is customer service and how long it is taking.

[Ben C34]

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/jSEvQ7E63_mqKRjioAO9Ns68t-Su95MGx0E5OtcVmvDYNSGoOcDJjQLdcEXDV8-D4qqUHNFUui4-FdRjh_pZwOiGPDjrgwk-vmSCLF2MZXs=w474-h310-nc

[Ben C34]

Why didn't that embed......

What's the response of car like, or not driving it yet?

[Nismo 3.2ish]

Doesn't sound that bad Pete. The new dump will improve response, something you should really feel driving it rather than see on a dyno. Obviously the turbo was selected for response so that's why its running out of puff up top on a 3.2 and why the bigger dump isnt making much difference in the top end. Don't stress about it. As long as all the tuning is done right so you don't have the previous issues. Don't worry about e85 either, it would be a head f**k for a daily seeing that its becoming more scarce. See how you go but I recon it should be exactly what you want. Hope so anyway.

I am not sure how it works but the PT6262 CEA is rated at over 700HP and this is only running around 520HP @ 22psi so I do not think it is running out of puff, might need some boost to get the 6262 going harder , do I need more boost, I do not think so,but it would be interesting to see how it goes

But as you said, it will be all I want if the dump gives a little more response and it only matters when you are driving it.

[r32-25t]

It's 700hp at the flywheel not at the wheels

[Nismo 3.2ish]

Why didn't that embed......

What's the response of car like, or not driving it yet?

Not yet, should be sometime this week, if the leak has been sorted, should know tomorrow and maybe it will be tuned then ?

[GTR_JOEY]

Your probably around the 560-570hp mark ATM Pete

700 is absolute best case scenario

[XGTRX]

Based on others, 6266 is better for higher revs on a 3.2. Your 62 rear is probably restricting exhaust gas flow. Even if you increase boost its a scenario of diminishing returns comparing to a bigger turbo, but the trade off would be low end. But the 3.2 will look after that to a point.

[Nismo 3.2ish]

Your probably around the 560-570hp mark ATM Pete

700 is absolute best case scenario

ATM it is about ,615HP ish crank. well I think 386 awkw is around 520whp

I know I keep saying this, but I still want it to go earlier , so I will wait and see what happens when I give it a run

[Scooby]

I'm probably missing something;

Ran car at full power (identical set up?) and noticed less power than before...casual observation, nothing more to add?

Turned boost down (from 22 psi) and then it doesn't misfire...is that being offered as the solution to the misfire?

Put other cams in that were found to be better, then took them out again...?

[GTR_JOEY]

Maybe a bit more then I quoted, but i dont beleive it is losing 100hp through the drive train

See how it feels

[Nismo 3.2ish]

Based on others, 6266 is better for higher revs on a 3.2. Your 62 rear is probably restricting exhaust gas flow. Even if you increase boost its a scenario of diminishing returns comparing to a bigger turbo, but the trade off would be low end. But the 3.2 will look after that to a point.

I know this will sound dumb to you blokes that have driven these cars for yonks, but getting used of a car that revs so high is very strange.

This car was limited at 10000rpm, or maybe no limiter,the first time I went over 10000rpm because I was too slow to change up, it went nuts from 6000rpm , hit 10,000 in a flash and I shit myself LOL

[XGTRX]

The best.......rev the guts out of it man.

[XGTRX]

You've got me excited now. He he

[Piggaz]

All jokes aside, what's the obsession with turning them so damn hard? Is it the noise of it screaming it's head off?

[Nismo 3.2ish]

I'm probably missing something;

Ran car at full power (identical set up?) and noticed less power than before...casual observation, nothing more to add?

Turned boost down (from 22 psi) and then it doesn't misfire...is that being offered as the solution to the misfire?

Put other cams in that were found to be better, then took them out again...?

Lets see how it goes, only a few days to wait until I get my arse in the car, that is the only test

[Nismo 3.2ish]

All jokes aside, what's the obsession with turning them so damn hard? Is it the noise of it screaming it's head off?

Mainly because it would not go over 6500rpm, there was no need to do it. Shit load of fun @5500rpm

[Piggaz]

Mainly because it would not go over 6500rpm, there was no need to do it. Shit load of fun @5500rpm

Not talking about your setup. I'm talking about turning the to 10,000 rpm and beyond for a car that's driven on the street. Is 8000 rpm not enough?

[XGTRX]

All jokes aside, what's the obsession with turning them so damn hard? Is it the noise of it screaming it's head off?

All of the above. He he. Love it.

Seeing you're such a fan of 26s, I think you will like to know I am putting a t04z on mine shortly. More lag, just the way you like it, he he