Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, RICE RACING said:

^ Why only run 19psi on E85 when you can run 27psi on 98 oct with a non gameboy nintendo ECU mate?

FAKE NEWS KENT LOL ;)  'gay stories' hahaha

Where has this gameboy dicksmith ecu stuff come from?

 

Just now, admS15 said:

Wow, mind blown. Please sell me your ecu and callibrate it for me son of rajab Rice. I will forever feel privileged i you, your wankness.

HALALtech user maybe?

Wow kents you all exceeded my expectations of full retard, good luck with gagtube wikkipedo and goolag serches for knowledge, fark yeah aids 2018 in full swing here from generation zero LOL.

 

46 minutes ago, RICE RACING said:

This is where I ask: what age are you and what do you do for a living LOL :)

You have no idea of WI let alone I would say much of engines and I can confidently state you know farking NOTHING about my systems or how how they work kent ;)

This is where I get to laugh at you.  I am quite likely older than you.  I am a combustion engineer.  I mean that literally.  I work for one of the best combustion companies in the world.  Big burners.  I know how to burn EVERYTHING.  We treat methanol as a waste fuel (in pulp & paper mills for example).

I can tell you that I have the ability to design a WI or WMI system on the scale of your little engine, or I can design one (like the WI system I designed for a pair of natural gas fired rotary kiln burners for NOx control) at the 80+MW range.

You should just get back in your box.  You're not playing with teenagers here, f**kwit.  We know that WMI and E85 are damn near equivalent.  One eyed cloud yelling like you've been doing is just funny.

  • Like 5

So apparently your systems dont run out of water or methanol? 

Spraying water and methanol into your motor has no detrimental effect on oil either? 

Simple questions really. Answer them!

If you knew anything about E85 you'd know there would be sweet fark all difference between an E85 & E49.5 tune.

Since you're talking about road cars are you really gunna feel 15kw difference up top on the street? Highly farkin unlikely kent!

 Go scrape some water outta the gutter you're laying in then jump on ya jizzphone to find some methanol to fill ya plastic tanks up so you can run high boost!

Take ya clunky Syvecs ECU's and ya aquamist plastic tanks and fark off!

For shits and giggles heres a google search.. Yep Methanol is readily available in Sydney ?

 

Screenshot_20180103-113640.jpg

riceracing

my car will be finished in approx 6 months...yes itll be on e85.

line me up and ill destroy ur water injected rotary ricebox.....

i would love to race you & show you whos boss, every time i snap a gear ill be gaining car lengths.....

i'll be sure to bring a camera crew with me to proove who the real ricer is PAL

E85 SR20 > WI 13B

WoW. That escalated quickly! This thread was just meant to shine some light in the benefits of water and water meth injection, not to bag on e85 or those that chose to use it or to say water injection is shit because you choose to use E85. Each to their own. For those who have readily available pump e85, it's easy to see that the choice is a no brainer. In fact, we would have probably been using e85 from the get go if it was readily available locally.  But for us and many others, this is not an option. We live in Cairns for almost 2 year and with no pump e85 available, drum e85 or wmi were the only other real options to run the power levels we wanted. Even now being back in Sydney, E85 isn't available in our local area or on any of our daily routes. So for our application and situation, wmi was the better option. A 20l drum of meth is $89 delivered through VPW. A 5l tank of 50 50 water meth last about 3 months of street driving. A night of roll racing, 12-13 runs, uses about 1.5l.

Both systems have their advantages and their disadvantages but are both proven winners in terms of increased performance. In fact, what some are seeing as the biggest winner now is a combination of both e85 and water injection. In these situations, pre turbo and post intercooler water or water meth injection is add to a vehicle already running e85. The e85 takes care of your in cylinder cooling and knock suppression, while the water injection keep IATs low and stable and increases the mass flow of the turbo. This type of set up would work extremely well for those who drift or love doing big burnouts, where a lot of time is spent at wide open throttle at relatively low vehicle speeds. 

We are happy with the decision to utilise water injection for our specific application. We are always willing to share and compare ideas and results of different systems and technologies as this creates a positive medium for development. 

Happy boost all, no matter you preferred jungle juice. 

Cheers 

  • Like 6

Hi Rice Racing, you may have confused SAU with other internet forums. Cut the personal attacks and enjoy your time here.

For now this is just a warning but the next personal attack will result in banning.

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

How nice it is to read something written by someone who can see both the wood and trees!

Thanks ;)

I know its hard for lots to accept that WI is superior to the ethanol time bomb chosen mistakenly by some here.

9 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

This is where I get to laugh at you.  I am quite likely older than you.  I am a combustion engineer.  I mean that literally.  I work for one of the best combustion companies in the world.  Big burners.  I know how to burn EVERYTHING.  We treat methanol as a waste fuel (in pulp & paper mills for example).

I can tell you that I have the ability to design a WI or WMI system on the scale of your little engine, or I can design one (like the WI system I designed for a pair of natural gas fired rotary kiln burners for NOx control) at the 80+MW range.

You should just get back in your box.  You're not playing with teenagers here, f**kwit.  We know that WMI and E85 are damn near equivalent.  One eyed cloud yelling like you've been doing is just funny.

When my wood heater needs repairs I'll send you a PM if you can fit me into your busy schedule mate ;)

1 hour ago, Duncan said:

Hi Rice Racing, you may have confused SAU with other internet forums. Cut the personal attacks and enjoy your time here.

For now this is just a warning but the next personal attack will result in banning.

Apply that standard at the start to the clowns who called me a troll or were saying I am selling something mate, and happy to stay and educate the masses. Otherwise its looking just like every other forum that is biased towards inept commentary and one sided treatment and attacks applied to people who are not part of your inner circle.

Irony of that is you wont learn from experienced people like myself who come in here when time allows to share 'relevant' industry experience, compared to drinking the cool aid self worship introspective love fest of narrow mindedness I have witnessed so far.

Not one person has address any of the proven shortfalls I listed of their beloved Ethanol not a single one.

But many have jumped on the bandwagon to react in a poor fashion then try to deride other alternatives and products, that sir is poor form and shows only the lack of intellect and respect on display so far. Lest see if they all can improve otherwise you will be stuck living in a narrow world view that is not much more than fake news or self validation at its finest ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...