Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow.... Peter you might be amazing at tuning WMI but your ability to communicate on a level that will lead people to respect you is horrifically bad!

If you actually delivered your knowledge and advice in a completely different way you would earn respect from the people here rather than trying to demand it like you currently are. 

Pull your head out of your arse, stop presuming everyone here knows nothing and start offering constructive advice rather than trying to bash everyone’s heads in with your almighty-ness. If you do that from this point onwards, great, we’ll try and forget your initial pig headed arrival on the scene and possibly start to respect you and appreciate your input. If not, piss off. Go and find another forum to swing your dick around in. 

  • Like 3

Maybe I should have been clearer, the requirement to be polite to other forum users applies to everyone, regardless of whether you think you are responding to someone else who "started it". 

If you are unhappy with the tone of a post report it, don't respond in kind.

  • Like 1

I hope i don't upset the calm here, however i am very curious how it is possible to implement a really good water/meth injection setup.

By that i mean with ultimate control. The simple on / 0ff system being the lest control, however completely workable at full noise.

Its just that at part throttle too much spray is occurring.

The Aquamist use a high speed valve to modulate the flow, however that is just affecting pressure downstream that gets to the nozzles, so a lower pressure would be a poor distribution i would have thought?

 

Seeing as you need to increase pressure by 4 to double the flow, it seems the useable range of modulation is limited.

 

So my question is, is it possible to get a really well controlled water meth spray in all conditions, not just full noise?

Seems to me its tricky. But also doesn't really matter i suppose if spraying too much at part throttle.

 

 

 

E85 safe injectors are probably getting close to being the right thing.  Stainless internals, etc,  blah, corrosion resistance, etc.....all the things that used to make normal fuel injectors last about 30 minutes on WMI.

Are you sure the pressure is not constant?

Understood it the way it always is the same pressure and the valve opens just for a momemt at low duty and increasing opening time on higher duty.

 

Maybe i don't understand it correctly. Can someone explain?

Would also like to buy the hfs3 next year.

 

 

 

 

A “Fast Acting Valve” (FAV) controls the delivery rate based on the PWM signal from the

HFS-3 controller. A constant line pressure (160 psi) is provided by the Aquatec pump

working in the “by-pass” mode. A PWM valve system guarantees wide dynamic range.

 

If you place a solenoid valve somewhere between the pump and the nozzle, then pulse it and vary/modulate the pulse width, then you are creating a second "nozzle" in the system - a variable nozzle.  This nozzle will cause a pressure drop.

Extreme examples.  1) You pulse the solenoid closed and leave it close.  The pressure drop is total, no pressure downstream and no flow through the injection nozzle. 2) You pulse the solenoid open and leave it open.  You get full pressure on the injection nozzle and full flow (assuming that the open valve is no significant restriction.

Assume that pulsing the valve 50% duty cycle results in a significant reduction in flow.  If it does, it only does so because the pressure behind the nozzle is similarly reduced (although the pressure change is larger because of Bernoulli).  It's not polite - the pressure will in fact pulse up and down around the lower average value.

7 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

I hope i don't upset the calm here, however i am very curious how it is possible to implement a really good water/meth injection setup.

By that i mean with ultimate control. The simple on / 0ff system being the lest control, however completely workable at full noise.

Its just that at part throttle too much spray is occurring.

The Aquamist use a high speed valve to modulate the flow, however that is just affecting pressure downstream that gets to the nozzles, so a lower pressure would be a poor distribution i would have thought?

 

Seeing as you need to increase pressure by 4 to double the flow, it seems the useable range of modulation is limited.

 

So my question is, is it possible to get a really well controlled water meth spray in all conditions, not just full noise?

Seems to me its tricky. But also doesn't really matter i suppose if spraying too much at part throttle.

 

 

 

The Aquamist HFS3 and HFS4 units both use constant pump pressure, PWM controlled injection. This ensures correct atomisation is maintained no mater the duty cycle. Here are some videos hi lighting the difference in atomisation between a progressive pump speed (PPS) system and a PWM system:

 

I have seen the videos and have owned one.

That test sort of shows  an issue that I wonder about. It's the fact that the flow of water is pulsing. So one cylinder may get more or less than another depending on where in the air stream the pulses are. From what I could tell the rate of the pulsing isn't given.

Also that video doesn't show how close the valve is, I imagine it is as close as possible.

I suppose my concern is it isn't the same as actually injecting fuel, so therefore doesn't have the same control.

Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of it, I just don't like it enough to buy another one after having parted out the car it was on years ago.

currently I am using a single nozzle pressure activated system and for all purposes it is doing the job great. Granted I don't need my car to have great part throttle boost response (drag use, straight line warrior, can't go around corners etc) so it's not the best example.

just thinking out loud. E85 injectors would be the best outcome for a properly controlled setup, if they handle it. Cmon Bosch, make me some injectors, I will buy 8.

 

  • Like 1
22 minutes ago, MagicMikeZ32 said:

While we are talking about using injectors for other stuff...

Has anyone used an injector for a boost solenoid?

That's mental.

 

 

 

I like it.

have to say that I can't be bothered to be a Guinea pig as my boost control is all setup. Someone has to try it.

12 minutes ago, Ben C34 said:

That's mental.

I like it.

have to say that I can't be bothered to be a Guinea pig as my boost control is all setup. Someone has to try it.

I think Andy from Adaptronic has, I believe they even used a dedicated compressed gas of some sort to control boost.

I read it a while back on the Guild of EFI Tuners.

Yuh, keep in mind that the solenoid is the vent, not the restrictor.  A fuel injector would be a vent, but it would be a small one, because I reckon that even a 2000cc injector would probably be a lot smaller vent than what opens up with a normal MAC valve etc.  So you'd end up using the injector to apply boost onto the actuator, not to vent in association with a separate restrictor orifice.

  • 4 months later...

G’day guys,

 

Had an enquiry earlier in the week from a member who has been following this post so thought I’d share some updates.

 

In one of my earlier posts, I mentioned that WMI and E85 would be a killer combo. I recently got the opportunity to test this theory after installing water injection in 2 R32GTRs. The first car ran a stock bottom end RB 26 with a big Precision turbo. On 27 psi, it made 800hp. With 500cc of post intercooler WMI it made an 830hp, will power remaining consistent on back to back pulls.  At the Cootamundra GTR drag battle, with ambient temps of 30 degrees, the car ran very fast and consistent times, the quickest being a 9.97. The maximum intake air temp logged at the end of a run was 33 degrees.  Under the same conditions without the WMI, intake air temps reached in excess of 90 degrees.

 IMG20180412014536.jpg

IMG20180507170211.jpg

IMG20180412000341.jpg

IMG20180412031845.jpg

The second car runs a RB 3.2L stroke bottom end with a 26 head, an 8582 precision turbo and a turbo 400 auto conversion. On 40 psi boost, it made 1078hp. With the WMI activated, 7% fuel trim and 2 more degrees of ignition timing, power increased to 1141hp. This car is yet to be track tested.  I’ll post the results once they are in.

IMG20180525233359.jpg

IMG20180525233649.jpg

IMG20180525233542.jpg

IMG20180523225632.jpg

 

Cheers

 

 

  • Like 2

All the seals in the Aquamist WMI system are designed for use with water and methanol and are not suitable for use with hydrocarbon based fuels. E85 contains 15% regular unleaded fuel, making it unsuitable to be used in the system. 

Methanol is quite cheap these days. Picked up 20L this week for $36 and when mixed 50:50 with distilled/demineralised water, will last 12 months+ in a street car.

1 hour ago, Bond said:

Fair point but seals shouldn't be hard to change if it made it easier for someone that didn't want to buy and store methanol.

What does that achieve though? You would still have to buy and store e85.

 

3 hours ago, Bond said:

Fair point but seals shouldn't be hard to change if it made it easier for someone that didn't want to buy and store methanol.

The slight inconvenience of buying 20L of methanol once every 12 months is well worth the effort when compared to effort, down time and potential system failure, associated with hydrocarbon contamination of the WMI system. In addition, you will make more power with 50:50 water methanol mix than with a 50:50 water e85 mix. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...