Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im not fully educated on the topic, but I wouldnt be surprised if the government changed the scope of NBN when they found out things were getting way too pricey and out of control.

nope

one of the liberal election promises they thought NBN was good but did not think it needed to be that fast.

one of the classic quotes at the time from a prominat was you could only be doing illegal things if you need internet that fast.

What are you all crying about? The article clearly states that any additional funds will be raised from private investors & not government.

So relax, your precious tax income isnt being spent.

Also if you read the article instead of shouting that the sky is falling, it says:

"While 20 per cent of premises will get fibre connections, 38 per cent will get fibre to the node and 34 per cent will access the NBN using the hybrid fibre coaxial cables that supply Foxtel services."

HFC connections offer gigabit speeds & not the doomsday 25mbps.

f**k me, everyone has turned into a telecommunications engineer/capital coordinator.

Fibre to node is on 25mbps under 800m

It hasn't beetn future proofed.

What is going to happen in 10 years when the standard is live hologram business meetings etc?

Fibre to node is on 25mbps under 800m

It hasn't beetn future proofed.

What is going to happen in 10 years when the standard is live hologram business meetings etc?

Don't look at today's technology as tomorrow's solution.

Who knows what breakthrough will be next. Mobile internet is getting faster and faster. 5g mobile is 1 gbps.

& according to the above only 30% would have access to FTTN. And only a percentage would be far from the node etc.

Everyone treating fibre like its plumbing or electricity but there are many ways to transfer data.

Not to mention the advancement of data compression which would reduce bandwidth needs.

Don't look at today's technology as tomorrow's solution.

Who knows what breakthrough will be next. Mobile internet is getting faster and faster. 5g mobile is 1 gbps.

& according to the above only 30% would have access to FTTN. And only a percentage would be far from the node etc.

Everyone treating fibre like its plumbing or electricity but there are many ways to transfer data.

This is true, hence what martin said (that I agree with) it should have been done properly or not at all

Don't look at today's technology as tomorrow's solution.

Who knows what breakthrough will be next. Mobile internet is getting faster and faster. 5g mobile is 1 gbps.

exactly right but when a gov takes 10 years to roll out technology that was out of date when they started...not ideal.

Oh and FTTN for first 18 months is only guaranteed 12 Mbits..that much money for 38% to get speeds they were getting already.

copper can only handle a certain amount having it in a NEW infrastructure is a joke.

the old plan of 93% getting FTTP worked, now just they should have dropped it if they were putting in this system.

This is true, hence what martin said (that I agree with) it should have been done properly or not at all

Well if money is a constraint & a solution can be delivered which meets today's needs for majority of public - then I have no issues.

Spending more money to future-proof technology is ridiculous because no one can predict what's around the corner with technology.

Perhaps we all go wifi - turn all the nodes Into fibre wifi hotspots & with advancement in antennas we can stream fibre speeds to mobile devices.

Who can say that a physical fibre line to your house is the only future.

Nothing but a big beat up by whinging opposition. Brunswick has FTTP & I bet none of them have connected fibre.

It's not a beat up. $50b IS being spent on tech from the 90's

$27bn capped government spend. The other half by private investors. What private investors spend their money on is not my problem.

Only 30% population will be forced onto FTTN. Big woop. They can wait for the next phase.

5g will happen as mobile data is a large revenue stream for telecom companies. No need for government intervention.

Yeah, and we currently have to pay like $100 for like 6gig of 4g... can't wait for telstra provided 5g :P

$27bn capped government spend. The other half by private investors. What private investors spend their money on is not my problem.

Only 30% population will be forced onto FTTN. Big woop. They can wait for the next phase.

1) It's 38%, you quoted it yourself

2) stop trying to make it sound like 70% is getting the good stuff by omitting percentages.

3) what happens if the private sector doesn't fund it?

Yeah, and we currently have to pay like $100 for like 6gig of 4g... can't wait for telstra provided 5g :P

1) It's 38%, you quoted it yourself

2) stop trying to make it sound like 70% is getting the good stuff by omitting percentages.

3) what happens if the private sector doesn't fund it?

1) 38% - not all will be kilometres from node etc

2) FTTP & HPC technology is pretty good.

3) Considering government has funded half the investment for a service far greater than today's speeds & no other options on the table - don't see why people won't jump on board to invest.

I might be joining you guys Leigh and Adam on two wheels! Maybe..

I don't do the two wheel thing anymore

Not saying I'll never get back into it

But too many crashes close to home

Feel it's only a matter of time and love life too much to risk it when there's plenty of fun without that risk or significantly lesser risk

Sure is unbeatable fun for the first 3 months of Ls though

Yeah and I wasn't exactly an angel on a bike either; should have gotten to the track much sooner instead of cooking brakes on the mountain passes at 1am.

I think everyone should get their Ls though, it's a great lesson in fragility on the road and awareness of surroundings especially motorbikes.

I've had my Ls for a year now, get off restrictions next month. Have been riding in the dirt all this time. Am just getting the last pieces of gear so I can take my dads GS500F for a few rides. But an opportunity has popped up to buy an unregistered Ninja 636 that I'm thinking of jumping at because cheap as chipzzzz

More lulz less complaining pls

Never shot a gun in my life, going to a range to try 13 of them today

Wish me luck

You'll surprise yourself with how good you are at it

Oh wait you're not in Australia...you'll be using big calibres and be average at it lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...