Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im not fully educated on the topic, but I wouldnt be surprised if the government changed the scope of NBN when they found out things were getting way too pricey and out of control.

nope

one of the liberal election promises they thought NBN was good but did not think it needed to be that fast.

one of the classic quotes at the time from a prominat was you could only be doing illegal things if you need internet that fast.

What are you all crying about? The article clearly states that any additional funds will be raised from private investors & not government.

So relax, your precious tax income isnt being spent.

Also if you read the article instead of shouting that the sky is falling, it says:

"While 20 per cent of premises will get fibre connections, 38 per cent will get fibre to the node and 34 per cent will access the NBN using the hybrid fibre coaxial cables that supply Foxtel services."

HFC connections offer gigabit speeds & not the doomsday 25mbps.

f**k me, everyone has turned into a telecommunications engineer/capital coordinator.

Fibre to node is on 25mbps under 800m

It hasn't beetn future proofed.

What is going to happen in 10 years when the standard is live hologram business meetings etc?

Fibre to node is on 25mbps under 800m

It hasn't beetn future proofed.

What is going to happen in 10 years when the standard is live hologram business meetings etc?

Don't look at today's technology as tomorrow's solution.

Who knows what breakthrough will be next. Mobile internet is getting faster and faster. 5g mobile is 1 gbps.

& according to the above only 30% would have access to FTTN. And only a percentage would be far from the node etc.

Everyone treating fibre like its plumbing or electricity but there are many ways to transfer data.

Not to mention the advancement of data compression which would reduce bandwidth needs.

Don't look at today's technology as tomorrow's solution.

Who knows what breakthrough will be next. Mobile internet is getting faster and faster. 5g mobile is 1 gbps.

& according to the above only 30% would have access to FTTN. And only a percentage would be far from the node etc.

Everyone treating fibre like its plumbing or electricity but there are many ways to transfer data.

This is true, hence what martin said (that I agree with) it should have been done properly or not at all

Don't look at today's technology as tomorrow's solution.

Who knows what breakthrough will be next. Mobile internet is getting faster and faster. 5g mobile is 1 gbps.

exactly right but when a gov takes 10 years to roll out technology that was out of date when they started...not ideal.

Oh and FTTN for first 18 months is only guaranteed 12 Mbits..that much money for 38% to get speeds they were getting already.

copper can only handle a certain amount having it in a NEW infrastructure is a joke.

the old plan of 93% getting FTTP worked, now just they should have dropped it if they were putting in this system.

This is true, hence what martin said (that I agree with) it should have been done properly or not at all

Well if money is a constraint & a solution can be delivered which meets today's needs for majority of public - then I have no issues.

Spending more money to future-proof technology is ridiculous because no one can predict what's around the corner with technology.

Perhaps we all go wifi - turn all the nodes Into fibre wifi hotspots & with advancement in antennas we can stream fibre speeds to mobile devices.

Who can say that a physical fibre line to your house is the only future.

Nothing but a big beat up by whinging opposition. Brunswick has FTTP & I bet none of them have connected fibre.

It's not a beat up. $50b IS being spent on tech from the 90's

$27bn capped government spend. The other half by private investors. What private investors spend their money on is not my problem.

Only 30% population will be forced onto FTTN. Big woop. They can wait for the next phase.

5g will happen as mobile data is a large revenue stream for telecom companies. No need for government intervention.

Yeah, and we currently have to pay like $100 for like 6gig of 4g... can't wait for telstra provided 5g :P

$27bn capped government spend. The other half by private investors. What private investors spend their money on is not my problem.

Only 30% population will be forced onto FTTN. Big woop. They can wait for the next phase.

1) It's 38%, you quoted it yourself

2) stop trying to make it sound like 70% is getting the good stuff by omitting percentages.

3) what happens if the private sector doesn't fund it?

Yeah, and we currently have to pay like $100 for like 6gig of 4g... can't wait for telstra provided 5g :P

1) It's 38%, you quoted it yourself

2) stop trying to make it sound like 70% is getting the good stuff by omitting percentages.

3) what happens if the private sector doesn't fund it?

1) 38% - not all will be kilometres from node etc

2) FTTP & HPC technology is pretty good.

3) Considering government has funded half the investment for a service far greater than today's speeds & no other options on the table - don't see why people won't jump on board to invest.

I might be joining you guys Leigh and Adam on two wheels! Maybe..

I don't do the two wheel thing anymore

Not saying I'll never get back into it

But too many crashes close to home

Feel it's only a matter of time and love life too much to risk it when there's plenty of fun without that risk or significantly lesser risk

Sure is unbeatable fun for the first 3 months of Ls though

Yeah and I wasn't exactly an angel on a bike either; should have gotten to the track much sooner instead of cooking brakes on the mountain passes at 1am.

I think everyone should get their Ls though, it's a great lesson in fragility on the road and awareness of surroundings especially motorbikes.

I've had my Ls for a year now, get off restrictions next month. Have been riding in the dirt all this time. Am just getting the last pieces of gear so I can take my dads GS500F for a few rides. But an opportunity has popped up to buy an unregistered Ninja 636 that I'm thinking of jumping at because cheap as chipzzzz

More lulz less complaining pls

Never shot a gun in my life, going to a range to try 13 of them today

Wish me luck

You'll surprise yourself with how good you are at it

Oh wait you're not in Australia...you'll be using big calibres and be average at it lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...