Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I stomped on the anchors hard this morning after doing 140 up the EastLink onramp, when I saw a chequered SUV with a lightbar in the left lane.

Oh, just Vicroads....

Do they have the ability to pull over cars and issue infringements? I've only ever seen them do trucks...

Dunno

Probably could pull over a car that had an obvious unroadworthy thing about it, or towing an overfilled trailer with loose items, but it's usually trucks that break their carrying load limits and missing rear stop lights etc.

Google maps says 878km, 8.7h drive

878km/3h = 292km/h... but there would need to be at least 4 or 5 stops along the route to make it viable... so it'd need to be going at 320+km/h

Hmmmmm

Edit: Japanese High Speed Trains can go up to 320km/h so I guess its a possibility.

But when you can fly for $100 and get there in half the time, with no need for infrastructure along the entire route... Is it worth it?

Google maps says 878km, 8.7h drive

878km/3h = 292km/h... but there would need to be at least 4 or 5 stops along the route to make it viable... so it'd need to be going at 320+km/h

Hmmmmm

Edit: Japanese High Speed Trains can go up to 320km/h so I guess its a possibility.

But when you can fly for $100 and get there in half the time, with no need for infrastructure along the entire route... Is it worth it?

Drive to airport, parking and dealing with the general public and security measures

High speed train prolly allow more luggage, smoother ride, face and talk to people, leg room

I dunno I reckon I'd take it over a plane if it did it in 3 hours

had no problems with those sorts of speeds when we were in Spain:

speedo.jpg

293 average...

and yes anything to avoid the airport is a good thing.

friends from ky did a top gear style test to eastern creek in Syd.

so yes they are 150km closer to syd. but other guy used cars to and from airport not PT, was pretty well line ball.

2 hours to airport, park, to terminal check in 1 hour early, 1.5 hour flight wait for luggage, pick up rental car drive to venue.

and the drive was significantly cheaper.

CBD would be a different matter, with airport express v driving in, prob flight would be a bit faster.

Add to that how embarrassing getting to and from Melb airport is, t5axi car or a bloody bus, i've been to 3rd world countries that had a rail link.

if you could catch a train from any train station in melb, into southern cross and then 3 hours later be in Syd central station..my god it would be wonderful.

Selling it to buy a Jet ski?

It's summer time Moh, tits out for the boys

nah, id like something with a bit more go, perhaps it is time for my vehicle tastes to EVOlve.

but the added security would be nice, so who knows. depends on what i see in japan in jan

nah, id like something with a bit more go, perhaps it is time for my vehicle tastes to EVOlve.

but the added security would be nice, so who knows. depends on what i see in japan in jan

I'm thinking about another Evo... might grab a 9 this time.

They are great cars man. They just need a good 230+ AWKW

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...