Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Greg, just spotted you on the Natsoft Results for Tampered Winton yesterday.

Why you only do 2 laps?

http://racing.natsoft.com.au/results/

-> Circuit

-> Tampered

-> P1 results...

apparently 140+ entrants

and timing crapped it self for the afternoon..

good old tampered, gotta love their hijinks.

I read an analysts report on 88E and seems the large rise was just from the better-than-expected results from some tests on the shale 30,000ft down. Everything from here is going to be slow progress (and expensive). They have 2 major repayments to make by end of march, so that going to hit the wallet but they have access to a lot of (loan) money.

Personally, i cant imagine gaining anything too substantial for the rest of march. If it goes down noticeably, maybe jump on it. But sounds like its a long term thing (12 months or more). Read somewhere that a profitable region is around $53 a barrel, so still a bit to go. And doesnt look like a major is going to make any moves for a while.

Keep in mind that work only happens on that part of Alaska during the summer, so i thought things would shut down October or so. Not sure if they were drilling in Jan/Feb this year though.

Hey Greg, just spotted you on the Natsoft Results for Tampered Winton yesterday.

Why you only do 2 laps?

http://racing.natsoft.com.au/results/

-> Circuit

-> Tampered

-> P1 results...

because greg car™

I read an analysts report on 88E and seems the large rise was just from the better-than-expected results from some tests on the shale 30,000ft down. Everything from here is going to be slow progress (and expensive). They have 2 major repayments to make by end of march, so that going to hit the wallet but they have access to a lot of (loan) money.

Personally, i cant imagine gaining anything too substantial for the rest of march. If it goes down noticeably, maybe jump on it. But sounds like its a long term thing (12 months or more). Read somewhere that a profitable region is around $53 a barrel, so still a bit to go. And doesnt look like a major is going to make any moves for a while.

Keep in mind that work only happens on that part of Alaska during the summer, so i thought things would shut down October or so. Not sure if they were drilling in Jan/Feb this year though.

Sounds like you missed the part where seismic photography is due this month along with an independant report assessing volumes of oil down there...if both come back good, there will be a significant rise.

Careful with so called "analysts", many of them stand to benefit from downramping. We've had more than a few for this stock - people telling people to sell and then buying in themselves at a cheaper price lol

On the other hand you have up rampers like me...

How long has it been running ok for? Because whatever the answer its probably not long enough to confidently sign up for a track day

I would have thought dyno tuned and run up many multiple times you would think that if it's gonna be solid it's going to be solid.

I guess I was ultimately wrong about that, but at what point do you seriously assume it's going to be OK?

Fark, milk shake and parma was a bad choice

Worst when you are at client site, and the boardroom is full of directors opposite the toilet & not wanting to destroy their toilets too

Edited by UNR33L
  • Like 1

I never learn to never order milkshakes with heavy/fatty foods. Just asking for trouble.

But so many burger places do exciting milkshake flavours.

Well the 88E website had the analysts findings on their website, so they musnt have thought it was too biased? It certainly didnt sound biased to me, i just took with me what stood out.

I also couldnt help but notice 2x enquiries in March from the ASX questioning the price rises and large amounts of share transactions...

Pretty much all downhill since I decided to buy, just as I anticipated... Should've got it at 4.2 like I was going to but didn't, but I'll probably just keep getting raped for now

At what point did you buy? Leave it in there, to me this is a retrace. When that announcement comes, shit will get real.

I never learn to never order milkshakes with heavy/fatty foods. Just asking for trouble.

But so many burger places do exciting milkshake flavours.

Well the 88E website had the analysts findings on their website, so they musnt have thought it was too biased? It certainly didnt sound biased to me, i just took with me what stood out.

I also couldnt help but notice 2x enquiries in March from the ASX questioning the price rises and large amounts of share transactions...

Standard procedure, speeding ticket for the stock doing too well. Lots of institutional investors getting on board. But as they say, sell when everyone is buying, buy when everyone is selling.

I just put another 3k into it, so hopefully I'm not wrong.

Pretty much the highest point of the last few days lol

Shit son

Well that high point could easily be the low point of next week; that's stocks for you. There's no reason for it to go down other than people taking profits from the gains they made last week. Once they clear out it'll stabilise or go up, unless we get hit with bad news (doubtful). Leave it in and see what happens I say. I've bought more in so I'm expecting it to climb again.

And here I was thinking you dropped 50k in the 4s...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...