Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Another shot of my daily from Eric. Thanks again mate she doesnt see a lot of track time since the 32 came along so now i can prove to people its not a total waste of 200kw lol

r33%202_zpsoy9uaml2.jpg

  • Like 2

For those I do not have on facebook, here are my pics from the day

It was good to catch up with everyone again

Thanks to the guys who took me out for a few passenger session, had a blast.

That last session with group 1 was probably one of my highlights, the battle between 1st and 2nd place (sorry couldn't remember who was driving) and Dave and Alex was awesome to watch.

qg8y8x7.jpg

xrE9fLv.jpg

rsRZafv.jpg

RYEw7vQ.jpg

Y2cE0am.jpg

xAV7ode.jpg

mVVCz2n.jpg

O6UwVS7.jpg

PAdDhNW.jpg

sv8Ssod.jpg

tdTR3RL.jpg

Q7GIQFm.jpg

AtHdHid.jpg

IvgfgTC.jpg

Hr32MkD.jpg

8DKbJeK.jpg

igaGpAm.jpg

is3Z8Rj.jpg

OBubGRp.jpg

gemaXn8.jpg

qdt0sFy.jpg

Q6B485B.jpg

UqOqZry.jpg

2nD0QAg.jpg

SENMqoE.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...