Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey so i have just finished all the basic mods on my r34 gtt. Full 3 inch turbo back exhaust with high flow cat, Blitz FMIC and High flow panel filter. I was reading up on fitting a manual boost controller to set it at 10 psi which is apparently the safe limit but came across alot of people suggesting with these mods a tune is a must or i could be causing damage to my engine. Still new to all this and i do apologize if this has been covered previously but i was getting confused with all the different info out there. Also found out there is no good tuners in Newcastle apparently? but there are people who can do road tunes. Are there any positives or negatives between the two?

Edited by Ry_R34GTT
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461815-am-i-in-need-of-a-tune/
Share on other sites

I'd definitely stay away from a road tune - it's too dangerous and it's obviously illegal. Any road tuner who uses virtual tuning and does not actually go through the rev range is a wankstick. Safest and most efficient option is to find a dyno operator!

So that rules out a road tune lol but more importantly am i currently in need of a tune? or can i get away with throwing a boost controller setting and 10 psi and being happy with it?

Also when you think about it, a tune is required if you do anything that is going to affect air or fuel into the engine.

So yeah, adding boost, changing intercooler, and changing exhaust all do these things, some to a bigger extent than others.

And yes as above you can only tune the car if there is a way to actually edit the computer to account for the changes.

This requires an aftermarket computer/ECU or a Piggyback or Chip to make the stock computer programmable easily (i.e Nistune).

If there's no tuners nearby, it's absolutely worth getting all the mods done at once where there is a tuner available to tune them after they're on the car.

  • Like 2

Ok so i just rang Croyden Racing Developments in Sydney and he suggested a Nistune for $1450. Which includes the Nistune, installation and tuning. Is that a reasonable price? and am i running the risk of damage by waiting to get the Nistune?

Ok so i just rang Croyden Racing Developments in Sydney and he suggested a Nistune for $1450. Which includes the Nistune, installation and tuning. Is that a reasonable price? and am i running the risk of damage by waiting to get the Nistune?

There is plenty to read on here, modding guides etc etc.

To give you a TL;DR version:

- You changed stock parts

- You want more power

- but you are running stock ECU which is tuned for stock parts

Get the nistune, get it tuned and enjoy the car.

I've had something similar on my gtt before and was running it for about 3 weeks before I got a tune.

Wind it up to 10psi and you'll be fine.

You'll get a marginal improvement from a tune but its a big expense and only really necessary when you change critical components such as AFM, injectors, or a bigger turbo.

Then Nistune is best bang for buck.

  • Like 2

Wind it up to 10psi and you'll be fine.

You'll get a marginal improvement from a tune but its a big expense and only really necessary when you change critical components such as AFM, injectors, or a bigger turbo.

Then Nistune is best bang for buck.

This.

Your stock ECU *should* protect your engine from harm by going into R&R if it reaches it's limits, 10psi shouldn't see this... might see some not so good condition parts start to fail though, coilpacks, spark gap to high, gaskets, turbo life, etc..

EDIT: you will be running rich so fuel economy will go down, flames might increase

Thanks Bob/Mathew, exactly the info i was after :) didn't want to get it tuned right away if i didn't have to but was worried i was going to cause damage.

Edited by Ry_R34GTT

From experience with being exactly where you are right now (same engine, roughly similar mods).......you may be able to run 11-12 psi before the ECU actually cuts (boost cut, although it's not a boost cut it's really a high airflow cut). And if it does cut you will hate it because it feels horrible, so you won't want to do it again and will back off the boost a little.

But the big issue is not so much R&R in the classic sense of the R33's ECU R&R - it is the simple fact that the top right corner of the fuel map is stupidly rich and the top right corner of the timing map is stupidly retarded - and running 10 psi you will definitely be working up in that area of the map, and using heaps of fuel and making much less power from that fuel than you could be.

Getting a Nistune and getting it tuned is a good use of $1450. You can realistically end up using less fuel in your normal driving and have it pay itself back over time anyway, so it's not as though it's a sunk cost. It's almost an investment.

  • Like 1

Getting a Nistune and getting it tuned is a good use of $1450. You can realistically end up using less fuel in your normal driving and have it pay itself back over time anyway, so it's not as though it's a sunk cost. It's almost an investment.

Your married aren't you!!!! :whistling:

  • Like 3

Another question thats rather off topic but seeings as we are here lol

I went and bought my boost tee and when i was fitting it i noticed a small brass restrictor in the hose going to the waste gate. If i was to remove this wouldn't i get more boost and not even have to use the boost controller? or am i being retarded?

Edit

I think i relaise im being retarded cos then i would have no way off controlling how much is being bled off. should i remove the restrictor before fitting the boost tee?

Edited by Ry_R34GTT

Another question thats rather off topic but seeings as we are here lol

I went and bought my boost tee and when i was fitting it i noticed a small brass restrictor in the hose going to the waste gate. If i was to remove this wouldn't i get more boost and not even have to use the boost controller? or am i being retarded?

Edit

I think i relaise im being retarded cos then i would have no way off controlling how much is being bled off. should i remove the restrictor before fitting the boost tee?

Here is the answer to that courtesy of SK (this is for an R33 - I presume R34 is similar):

This is the 10 minute no cost boost to 0.5 bar rerouting of the vacuum hoses [thanks to SK]. Disconnect the two vacuum hoses from the solenoid. Then connect the boost feed (from the cross over pipe on the left of the picture) to the standard T piece. Connect one side of the T piece directly to the wastegate actuator (on the right of the picture). The remaining connection on the T piece goes back into the inlet via the BOV return pipe (on the standard fitting). Make sure to put the standard brass restrictor in that vacuum hose to bypass the desired amount back into the turbo inlet. The standard bypass hole of 1.25 mm bypasses enough air flow for 0.5 bar. (See photo)

PS: If you want more boost you can drill out the bypass, 1.5 mm = more boost (around 0.7 bar) 1.75mm = a bit more (around 1.0 bar).

OK, this is the picture of the vacuum hoses. The boost pressure comes out of the intercooler return pipe (that's the big black one on the left) via the standard fitting. It travels down the vacuum hose to the standard T piece.

The right hand side of the T piece goes to the wastegate actuator via another short piece of vacuum hose. It has 2 standard spring clamps on it. So that "some" of the boost pressure goes to the wastegate actuator.

The left hand side of the T piece is connected to another (longer) piece of vacuum hose that goes to the standard fitting on the BOV return pipe. You can't see that fitting in the picture as it is hidden by the (big black) turbo to intercooler pipe. I squeezed the standard restrictor into that vacuum hose, it is tight fit, so be patient and use some lubricant (RP7 in my case).

The restrictor limits the amount of boost pressure that is bled off, so that the "some" pressure that goes to the wastegate actuator is actually less than the boost pressure. This means you get more boost before the wastegate opens at its usual 4-5 psi. How much more depends on the size of the hole in the restrictor, the bigger the hole the more it bypasses and the higher the boost.

The standard hole is ~1.25 mm and gave ~0.5 bar on my Stagea, which has standard everything else (no exhaust, no FMIC, std filter, etc). If you have mods, you may not get the same boost pressure, so you may have to adjust the size of the hole in the restrictor, it is brass so you can easily solder it up and redrill the hole smaller if necessary.

post-49463-0-84471400-1450847615_thumb.jpg

I did read that but struggled to make sense of it somewhat as i cant see the pictures? im a noob :D haha

So basically without even fitting the boost tee i can get the 10 psi im after just by re routing the hoses and drilling out that small brass restrictor?

I did read that but struggled to make sense of it somewhat as i cant see the pictures? im a noob :D haha

So basically without even fitting the boost tee i can get the 10 psi im after just by re routing the hoses and drilling out that small brass restrictor?

Pic there now. Should not necessarily have to drill out restrictor. Read it a few times and it will become clearer. 10 minutes for SK might be an hour for you but it's not rocket science.

BTW have you got a boost gauge? If not, be sure to get one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...