Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thank god Jack posted his Sandown time because I've been embarrassed being the #1 spot on that list given I can think of 8 GTR's faster than my time off the top of my head.

Sam

Benno

JFK

Aaron

Jack

Frank

Tony

Trevor

Scotsman

  • 2 weeks later...

Roy,

I scrapped out a PB with the vic boys last Friday at EC.

1.48.48 but I know there were at least 3 vics who were quicker on the day, Im sure they will post up soon.

There was a 1.45 and 2 x 1.47's

Big john also broke into the 1.43's

Roy,

I scrapped out a PB with the vic boys last Friday at EC.

1.48.48 but I know there were at least 3 vics who were quicker on the day, Im sure they will post up soon.

There was a 1.45 and 2 x 1.47's

Big john also broke into the 1.43's

Well done Paul, to go 2 seconds quicker than previous is a top effort!!!!

Will send you some footage soon...

"PEEEEOOOOOWWWW" - the sound as you guys went oof topic :P

SAU Nickname: ZENNON

Car Make and Model: 92 R32 GTST

Circuit Name: Queensland Raceway Sprint Track

Lap time: 1:06.15

Modifications

Engine: RB20DET with FMIC, pod, gtr fuel pump and 3" zorts

Power: 160rwkw

Suspension: teins adjustable coilovers

Tyres: falkens wets

Brakes: stock rear, gtr front

Body weight: stock

"PEEEEOOOOOWWWW" - the sound as you guys went oof topic :)

SAU Nickname: ZENNON

Car Make and Model: 92 R32 GTST

Circuit Name: Queensland Raceway Sprint Track

Lap time: 1:06.15

Modifications

Engine: RB20DET with FMIC, pod, gtr fuel pump and 3" zorts

Power: 160rwkw

Suspension: teins adjustable coilovers

Tyres: falkens wets

Brakes: stock rear, gtr front

Body weight: stock

SAU Nickname: ZENNON

Car Make and Model: 92 R32 GTST

Circuit Name: Queensland Raceway Sprint Track

Lap time: 1:04.26

Modifications since last track day:

2+ experience points :laugh:

(and not being in the n00b group helped too!)

Getting my r32 gtst 4door prep't up for the track, and looking at improving on my current times that i have recorded in a slower heavier car. However the 944 is amazingly stable and has more grip than a nuns you no what!

Porsche 944 S2

Weighing 1343kg with 148 kw at the fly (stock power and weight)

racing suspension setup , changing the rear tortion bar to a coil over setup

running

Bridgestone RE55 tyres

Pageant black brake pads

Calder: 1:09.323

Winton Long track: 1:40.021

Winton Short track: 1:09.142

Phillip Island: 1:54.645

Sandown: 1:29.356

Some more reference lap times for you Troy:

Bathurst - Richards/Skaife - 1.10.68

Sandown - Richards - 1.15.75

Mallala - Skaife - 1.10.68

Oran Park - Skaife - 1.10.26

Eastern Creek - Richards - 1.36.29

Winton - Skaife - 1.01.56

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

SAU Nickname:zr240

Car Make and Model:datsun 240z

Circuit Name:Phillip Island

Lap time:1:47.6

Modifications

Engine: L28

Power:250hp (approx)

Suspension:coil over koni

Tyres:dunlop slick

Brakes:Mazda 4 spot frt and single spot rear

Body weight 950kg

Just brought a r33 turbo half cut to put in the 240z :P

Time is on natsoft from state round in about 2002

Ash

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...