Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

CTP Fraud and the NSW Gov't - "Red Light On Rorts"

A new Compulsory Third Party insurance system that introduces fixed compensation for minor injuries is being planned by the Baird Gov't in an attempt to cut the soaring cost of green slips

Better Regulation Minister Victor Dominello told the DT he also wanted to crack down on green slip fraud, which he said was responsible for adding $75 a year onto our CTP insurance bills.

Mr Dominello said CTP prices had risen by more than $40, or 8%, in the past year, and insurance fraud was a key contributor.

He said the government was seeing fraudulent court claims for minor injuries, including claims for more people in one car than there are seats in that said car, and instances in minor low-speed prangs where claims are made on behalf of babies for psychological injuries and future loss of income.

These claims are costing on average, between $95,000 and $100,000.

The average green slip costs more than $600 and exceeds 34% of average weekly earnings, up from 28% in 2007.

The reforms, to be introduced later this year, would involve a two-tiered system, where less serious claims involve set payouts, as occurs with the workers compensation scheme.

Lawyers have a vested interest in opposing the reforms, and insurance companies are accused of profiting by as much as 20%.

"Both the insurance sector and the legal fraternity will need to come together with the government so we are all acting in the interests of the consumers," Mr Dominello said.

"In this case, it's the interests of the motorists and those injured."

Another change could be a "no-fault" scheme similar to Victoria to prevent costly legal battles where people argue over who's to blame.

CTP prices for the average Sydney motorist have increased by more than 70% on average since 2008.

Further prices of between $60 and $90, or between 10 and 15% have been flagged by insurers , who say they need the additional money to offset increasing claims, including those by fraudsters.

Reported by Andrew Clenell

  • Like 2

I would like to see some data on number of claims and payouts for each one.

Sydney CTP is almost $900 this year. I used to pay $300 and thought that was expensive.

Seems like "more claims" it's just excuse to increase revenue.

Maybe we need better detection of fraud and more serious punishments to deter people. Seems to be another case where its just too easy to get away with it or get a slap on the wrist if you do get caught, so its an attractive option for those without morals. Imagine what could have been avoided if Edward Lees got what he deserved when he was first caught?

Last accident I had the guy had no insurance. Later in the day he went and bought insurance and then asked if I would lie about the date. I said no, and he said "Who's going to pay for my car to be fixed?". FFS what do you think happens when you dont have insurance!

  • Like 1

Yes, Adam, I wonder if the people who do these things are motivated by greed or desperation or both. Maybe, it's even in a person's makeup.

During the State Mines fires in the Blue Mtns, I went up to a fruiterer who collects rare Commodores.

He's not devoid of money whilst he and his wife own lots of commercial property through the main street of the suburb I live in.

Anyway, he came outside (out of earshot of his wife most probably), and quizzed me on who would grant him an immediate cover on his Holdens.

I said wtf T*** don't you have them covered?
He said that they're stored and he didn't think that they could all go up in smoke until the N-W wind started blowing hard.

I said you're the effin reason why we're paying such high premiums - 'fair weather friend'.

What a bum!

  • Like 2

I'm still unclear on exactly how Andrew Clenell performed CTP Insurance Fraud?

The market seems to be a good example of a government formed oligopoly with everyone sharing cosy, comfortable profits to me. I am hugely doubtful that fraud is the main cost driver and would love to see some actual evidence rather than quotes from the insurers who are trying to defend why their profits should continue....

  • Like 4

I'm still unclear on exactly how Andrew Clenell performed CTP Insurance Fraud?

The market seems to be a good example of a government formed oligopoly with everyone sharing cosy, comfortable profits to me. I am hugely doubtful that fraud is the main cost driver and would love to see some actual evidence rather than quotes from the insurers who are trying to defend why their profits should continue....

2nded.
  • Like 1

There is a big shake up coming in the CTP industry, and the state govt and insurers attempts to more than triple the price of CTP 2 years ago were comprehensively thwarted; largely by the lobbying efforts of motorcyclists.

They want their money though, and they'll smear anyone but themselves to protect their gravy train.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
There is a big shake up coming in the CTP industry, and the state govt and insurers attempts to more than triple the price of CTP 2 years ago were comprehensively thwarted; largely by the lobbying efforts of motorcyclists.

They want their money though, and they'll smear anyone but themselves to protect their gravy train.


I was one of the organisers of the protest in the Sydney CBD for that. You need a big event to get the pollies to even pretend to give a shit and try to stop you getting fleeced
  • Like 2

I'll add something to this though. It is impossible to organise something that benefits a group especially one like motorists without special interest people high jacking it. The biggest failing with the CTP rally was that the pressure was hardly maintained. The head of the motorcycle council was only interested in using it as a soapbox for his ambitions and the police treated it like a patch club gathering. While car clubs are wide and varied in Australia and something bit could In theory be organised, the line between success and failure is sooo thin. The media are always looking to paint car people as hoons and the motoring council is more geared towards old people. Sensationalist media and the car scene will never mix. And we all no pollies will lie to your face and promise the world till their portfolios change. And that's what happened with the roads minister after the protest.

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...