Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How is this set up for you?

Yep I'm happy with it, it feels controlled and predictable on the track and compliant enough on the street.

I ran the same coilover+swaybar setup with softer 6kg/5kg springs in street use only originally. It was great but once I took it to the track it was a bit rolly in the corners so decided to go stiffers springs - the BC's normally come with 8/6. Surprisingly there wasn't much difference in ride quality really .

One thing to note about the ARC swaybars is that AFAIK they are hollow whereas the OEMs are solid, so the difference in stiffness is not quite as radical as it might look based on the diameter.

Yoshii, we can't tell you what sizes to get.

The ARBs affect the balance of the car (under-over steer balance that is). How much you need at the front and rear depends on the inherent balance from your actual springs and dampers, coupled with your own preference. If oversteer frightens you then you would be well advised to keep the rear bar smaller than the front. But if perchance you have much stiffer front springs than your rear, then the same size ARBs at both ends might still be non-oversteery. Impossible to advise you precisely.

I have 24mm adjustables at both ends. Front set to hard, rear set to soft. That's pretty stiff, although it is possible to go a fair bit stiffer. The front stiffness aids turn in response, but does reduce grip in the wet! The rear stiffness tends to make my car quite willing to get the tail out. This is with 5+kg springs at the front and 3ish kg at the rear, with SK modified Bilstein B6s.

How are you getting such low spring rates? Most of the coilovers I find in Japan for the car has a minimal of 8 for the front and 6 for the rear.

As above the both sides situation

This is for track in r32 gtst

Ive always been in camp 2 - 8kg Front 6 rear with 27mm front sway and 24 mm rear sway - then moved to 7kg front and 4kg rear with same larger sways

now.... tomorrow is my first trial in Camp 1... 11kg front with 5kg rear and back to standard sways - cant say im not nervous about it but hey MCA do know what they are talking about so I'll listen... for now

How are you getting such low spring rates? Most of the coilovers I find in Japan for the car has a minimal of 8 for the front and 6 for the rear.

And on top of that....it is possible to buy pretty much any spring you want to suit a coilover. 200mm free length? No problem. 230? Yup. 260? Sure! 2kg/mm? Certainly, Sir. 14 kg/mm? Yes, would you like it painted yellow or blue?

  • Like 1

Im running the whiteline BNK010 kit on my r34 and the car is so much better than just having coilovers, no body roll and the car feel really direct and sharp. I'm pretty sure the kit is a 24mm front with 22mm rear.

Yep I'm happy with it, it feels controlled and predictable on the track and compliant enough on the street.

I ran the same coilover+swaybar setup with softer 6kg/5kg springs in street use only originally. It was great but once I took it to the track it was a bit rolly in the corners so decided to go stiffers springs - the BC's normally come with 8/6. Surprisingly there wasn't much difference in ride quality really .

One thing to note about the ARC swaybars is that AFAIK they are hollow whereas the OEMs are solid, so the difference in stiffness is not quite as radical as it might look based on the diameter.

OEM are hollow.

Hollow is a plus in that the bar will be lighter than an equivalently stiff solid bar. Bigger diameter, but lighter.

Stiffness is a function of the 4th power of diameter. So the bit of steel near the centre of the bar does relatively nothing for stiffness compared to the bit of steel out near the edge. So if you can make it hollow it will be lighter. If you make it solid at the same diameter as the hollow bar, it will be a little stiffer. Most aftermarket crowds don't make hollow bars because it is harder to get the raw stock and they are more difficult to form.

  • Like 1

Hollow is a plus in that the bar will be lighter than an equivalently stiff solid bar. Bigger diameter, but lighter.

Stiffness is a function of the 4th power of diameter. So the bit of steel near the centre of the bar does relatively nothing for stiffness compared to the bit of steel out near the edge. So if you can make it hollow it will be lighter. If you make it solid at the same diameter as the hollow bar, it will be a little stiffer. Most aftermarket crowds don't make hollow bars because it is harder to get the raw stock and they are more difficult to form.

Spot on. That's why I jumped on the ARCs, rare items.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...