Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How is this set up for you?

Yep I'm happy with it, it feels controlled and predictable on the track and compliant enough on the street.

I ran the same coilover+swaybar setup with softer 6kg/5kg springs in street use only originally. It was great but once I took it to the track it was a bit rolly in the corners so decided to go stiffers springs - the BC's normally come with 8/6. Surprisingly there wasn't much difference in ride quality really .

One thing to note about the ARC swaybars is that AFAIK they are hollow whereas the OEMs are solid, so the difference in stiffness is not quite as radical as it might look based on the diameter.

Yoshii, we can't tell you what sizes to get.

The ARBs affect the balance of the car (under-over steer balance that is). How much you need at the front and rear depends on the inherent balance from your actual springs and dampers, coupled with your own preference. If oversteer frightens you then you would be well advised to keep the rear bar smaller than the front. But if perchance you have much stiffer front springs than your rear, then the same size ARBs at both ends might still be non-oversteery. Impossible to advise you precisely.

I have 24mm adjustables at both ends. Front set to hard, rear set to soft. That's pretty stiff, although it is possible to go a fair bit stiffer. The front stiffness aids turn in response, but does reduce grip in the wet! The rear stiffness tends to make my car quite willing to get the tail out. This is with 5+kg springs at the front and 3ish kg at the rear, with SK modified Bilstein B6s.

How are you getting such low spring rates? Most of the coilovers I find in Japan for the car has a minimal of 8 for the front and 6 for the rear.

As above the both sides situation

This is for track in r32 gtst

Ive always been in camp 2 - 8kg Front 6 rear with 27mm front sway and 24 mm rear sway - then moved to 7kg front and 4kg rear with same larger sways

now.... tomorrow is my first trial in Camp 1... 11kg front with 5kg rear and back to standard sways - cant say im not nervous about it but hey MCA do know what they are talking about so I'll listen... for now

How are you getting such low spring rates? Most of the coilovers I find in Japan for the car has a minimal of 8 for the front and 6 for the rear.

And on top of that....it is possible to buy pretty much any spring you want to suit a coilover. 200mm free length? No problem. 230? Yup. 260? Sure! 2kg/mm? Certainly, Sir. 14 kg/mm? Yes, would you like it painted yellow or blue?

  • Like 1

Im running the whiteline BNK010 kit on my r34 and the car is so much better than just having coilovers, no body roll and the car feel really direct and sharp. I'm pretty sure the kit is a 24mm front with 22mm rear.

Yep I'm happy with it, it feels controlled and predictable on the track and compliant enough on the street.

I ran the same coilover+swaybar setup with softer 6kg/5kg springs in street use only originally. It was great but once I took it to the track it was a bit rolly in the corners so decided to go stiffers springs - the BC's normally come with 8/6. Surprisingly there wasn't much difference in ride quality really .

One thing to note about the ARC swaybars is that AFAIK they are hollow whereas the OEMs are solid, so the difference in stiffness is not quite as radical as it might look based on the diameter.

OEM are hollow.

Hollow is a plus in that the bar will be lighter than an equivalently stiff solid bar. Bigger diameter, but lighter.

Stiffness is a function of the 4th power of diameter. So the bit of steel near the centre of the bar does relatively nothing for stiffness compared to the bit of steel out near the edge. So if you can make it hollow it will be lighter. If you make it solid at the same diameter as the hollow bar, it will be a little stiffer. Most aftermarket crowds don't make hollow bars because it is harder to get the raw stock and they are more difficult to form.

  • Like 1

Hollow is a plus in that the bar will be lighter than an equivalently stiff solid bar. Bigger diameter, but lighter.

Stiffness is a function of the 4th power of diameter. So the bit of steel near the centre of the bar does relatively nothing for stiffness compared to the bit of steel out near the edge. So if you can make it hollow it will be lighter. If you make it solid at the same diameter as the hollow bar, it will be a little stiffer. Most aftermarket crowds don't make hollow bars because it is harder to get the raw stock and they are more difficult to form.

Spot on. That's why I jumped on the ARCs, rare items.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
    • What sold me on Trailer Park Boys is this scene: Great stuff, just stay clear from the new Netflix production.
×
×
  • Create New...