Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How is this set up for you?

Yep I'm happy with it, it feels controlled and predictable on the track and compliant enough on the street.

I ran the same coilover+swaybar setup with softer 6kg/5kg springs in street use only originally. It was great but once I took it to the track it was a bit rolly in the corners so decided to go stiffers springs - the BC's normally come with 8/6. Surprisingly there wasn't much difference in ride quality really .

One thing to note about the ARC swaybars is that AFAIK they are hollow whereas the OEMs are solid, so the difference in stiffness is not quite as radical as it might look based on the diameter.

Yoshii, we can't tell you what sizes to get.

The ARBs affect the balance of the car (under-over steer balance that is). How much you need at the front and rear depends on the inherent balance from your actual springs and dampers, coupled with your own preference. If oversteer frightens you then you would be well advised to keep the rear bar smaller than the front. But if perchance you have much stiffer front springs than your rear, then the same size ARBs at both ends might still be non-oversteery. Impossible to advise you precisely.

I have 24mm adjustables at both ends. Front set to hard, rear set to soft. That's pretty stiff, although it is possible to go a fair bit stiffer. The front stiffness aids turn in response, but does reduce grip in the wet! The rear stiffness tends to make my car quite willing to get the tail out. This is with 5+kg springs at the front and 3ish kg at the rear, with SK modified Bilstein B6s.

How are you getting such low spring rates? Most of the coilovers I find in Japan for the car has a minimal of 8 for the front and 6 for the rear.

As above the both sides situation

This is for track in r32 gtst

Ive always been in camp 2 - 8kg Front 6 rear with 27mm front sway and 24 mm rear sway - then moved to 7kg front and 4kg rear with same larger sways

now.... tomorrow is my first trial in Camp 1... 11kg front with 5kg rear and back to standard sways - cant say im not nervous about it but hey MCA do know what they are talking about so I'll listen... for now

How are you getting such low spring rates? Most of the coilovers I find in Japan for the car has a minimal of 8 for the front and 6 for the rear.

And on top of that....it is possible to buy pretty much any spring you want to suit a coilover. 200mm free length? No problem. 230? Yup. 260? Sure! 2kg/mm? Certainly, Sir. 14 kg/mm? Yes, would you like it painted yellow or blue?

  • Like 1

Im running the whiteline BNK010 kit on my r34 and the car is so much better than just having coilovers, no body roll and the car feel really direct and sharp. I'm pretty sure the kit is a 24mm front with 22mm rear.

Yep I'm happy with it, it feels controlled and predictable on the track and compliant enough on the street.

I ran the same coilover+swaybar setup with softer 6kg/5kg springs in street use only originally. It was great but once I took it to the track it was a bit rolly in the corners so decided to go stiffers springs - the BC's normally come with 8/6. Surprisingly there wasn't much difference in ride quality really .

One thing to note about the ARC swaybars is that AFAIK they are hollow whereas the OEMs are solid, so the difference in stiffness is not quite as radical as it might look based on the diameter.

OEM are hollow.

Hollow is a plus in that the bar will be lighter than an equivalently stiff solid bar. Bigger diameter, but lighter.

Stiffness is a function of the 4th power of diameter. So the bit of steel near the centre of the bar does relatively nothing for stiffness compared to the bit of steel out near the edge. So if you can make it hollow it will be lighter. If you make it solid at the same diameter as the hollow bar, it will be a little stiffer. Most aftermarket crowds don't make hollow bars because it is harder to get the raw stock and they are more difficult to form.

  • Like 1

Hollow is a plus in that the bar will be lighter than an equivalently stiff solid bar. Bigger diameter, but lighter.

Stiffness is a function of the 4th power of diameter. So the bit of steel near the centre of the bar does relatively nothing for stiffness compared to the bit of steel out near the edge. So if you can make it hollow it will be lighter. If you make it solid at the same diameter as the hollow bar, it will be a little stiffer. Most aftermarket crowds don't make hollow bars because it is harder to get the raw stock and they are more difficult to form.

Spot on. That's why I jumped on the ARCs, rare items.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Given you're running a 2.8 and my 2.5 is not really like for like, I suspect there could be a bit more timing you could give it. What is the kW yield per degree you're putting through it? Here's my E85 map to give you an idea, where it was I could still get another 3~4kW per degree thrown at it.  
    • It turns out that Setrab make a fan specifically for the oil cooler which is great and I've installed it with minimal swearing. I removed my 2x 12in push fans from the front of my aircon condenser and wired them into this. My main thermo fans kick on when I use the aircon anyway and would effectively already be working as puller fans through the condensor which is infront of the rad. The push fans (understandably) didn't really do much in the config they were previously in so now they're out. Now we're on to the "Oil fan doesn't really do much either!". Yes I'll duct it next if it does nothing in heavy use which it shouldn't. But hey, the object exists and fits great and is cool. Let me have this. The car is still in the "do my fittings leak oil now? do my wheels actually rub?" phase. I did a spirited drive on them and didn't hear or feel anything. Then I got back home and noticed there were grind marks on the inside of the rims, though I couldn't see where they were touching I got out the grinder and attacked the suspects. Note: I do not know how to use a grinder. Then I realised I had dragged my new rims across my concrete driveway before I did this drive. I didn't think I had damage at that time when I briefly looked...... but remembered this occurred after I did all the angle grinding. The grinding on the wheels in some very specific spots. It's not around the whole rim for example, which lines up with dragging it across concrete more than hitting a suspension component for even 1 full rotation. So everything is currently painted and taped up and I need to test it some more to see if it really IS rubbing, but from inside the car it doesn't feel like it is. In other news I attempted to do a before and after comparison of the heads/cam upgrade thing. Dynos lie, everything is in different measurements. Here is the data from the sandown back straight. Car go faster than before. Vroom vroom.
    • Here's my base ignition. +3 correction to redline when shooting water/meth which is always on. Looking at my old ignition table, I should be able to add 1-2 degree's next time I'm on the dyno.  Let me know your thoughts. 
    • Given what I know now - same haha, but this was 12 years ago with second hand 740cc Nismo injectors in my S15 daily, I was too busy hunting elsewhere for the issue to even look at the injectors, running through some cleaner was a happy coincidence haha
    • Not a terrible idea. But if I ever had concerns that my injectors were sufficiently dirty to be causing me a problem, they would be out of the engine and onto the actual injector cleaner/testing bench.
×
×
  • Create New...