Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

I can confirm the 7670 is great on a 2.8, so it'll be OK on a 2.6 and most likely pretty bad on a 2.0.

7163 is best for the 2L, but some SR20 people don't believe life exists until 5k and sideways in which case the 7670 will be ideal. There are actually a few reports on the 7670 on the 2L, I want to say a few were tuned by JEM up on their facebook page over the last year or so.

It is similar in size to a GTX3576, which is most would consider to be a pretty big ask for a 2L with a 7k rev limit and RWD.

Can you link me to or PM me some results of this? I have tons of experience with the 8374 on 2.8L, but 7670 has me interested for sure. For a pumpgas car 2.6 it would probably be an awesome fit.

ok, well I spent a good time now going through Dave's VQ35 GTR data in all permutations from drags to street to roll races and loading up from 1st gear to higher and his is twin EFR7163 (IWG set up) and I cant see any real improvement *tangible* over the current 9180 set up we run, suffers exactly the same things I was describing earlier. I know its a 300cc odd larger engine of different type but best comparison I have to doing it myself.

I think at this stage it will show higher power potential with the same level (maybe better?) of response, but I cant see it being the magnitude of increase the customer wants, given this is a larger capacity engine by 300 odd cc but very similar rpm, and performance level between the two cars right now.

Edited by RICE RACING
6 minutes ago, burn4005 said:

does the VQ35 have VVT? surely that would help it out a bit?

or are you just talking about transient response in the "sweet spot" like 70% of max rpm on/off throttle?

Transient 0-100 tps/pps, 0 to 30psi, in all gears/road speeds.

As some said before dyno is one thing, the bit bloke wants is on road/track, its about the same from what I can see mate.

On 6/27/2018 at 4:52 PM, BakemonoRicer said:

Power delivery wise....I don't see how an SR20 w/ VCT is at any disadvantage compared to a MIVEC 9 engine.......

No point comparing RB to SR.... SR is renowned for its early torque & fat ass midrange.....it is the ultimate 2L engine.....

Sounds like it'll be a complete HOLD THE F**K ON experience.... I can't wait

For 7670 I think you would want sr with ve head. not so much det head in my opinion. Unless you are talking about drag racing.

Although I am not 100% on all the different mister bishi motors.

 

I'm looking at a top mount single on a 6-boost manifold for next summer, the RB26 should be able to handle pretty much anything I throw at it (fully forged etc). Currently got two N1 ball bearing turbos, a bit over 400rwhp and it's not enough :whistling: It will be used as a summer toy, some trackdays, dragrace and whatever sounds like fun. The issue is that I still want it to be useable on the road to get to car meets and hang out, or just go on a cruise in the sunset/sunrise.

EFR 8374 is the one I'm looking at, but I'm having a hard time deciding what size would be the perfect match for my engine, don't want to loose that much response

Soo... whats the conclusion among all you experienced people?

  • 0,92 A/R internal gate VS 1,05 A/R external
  • IF 1,05 A/R, worth it to go with two gates to keep it "true" twinscroll?
  • Aluminum CHRA VS steel, how much difference does it make for the manifold?
29 minutes ago, sneakey pete said:

Everyone will say 1.05 external gate but IWG is sooooooo much easier to fit.
CHRA has identical sizes only difference is weight

I personally love IWG, its got merits in that there is reduction in internal volume and this always improves response it also has a smaller valve area so the anti phase capsule (if running one of the after market actuators) needs less effect as the TIP is not pushing as hard through simple P=F/A relationship.

Use Borg Warner matchbot, there you will see what size WG area you need, its not as large as some would have you believe too ;)

IWG!

So simple. So much power. My 2.75L was 3600 rpm boost in 3rd from a 2k punch. Also made 740 whp at 30 psi tapering to 25 on top on E85. Car would trap 128 mph in 1/4 on pumpgas and 19 or so psi. Gained about 150 whp when going to E85 and high boost from there (sorry never got track numbers)

  • Like 1

I know its a shit box rotary lol, but some may be interested in some of the set up analysis I do on matching, prior to going willy nilly on changing out turbo's + a raft of other things like main fuel table mapping etc.

On this application looked at the twin EFR7163 for my own use.

QIYjazS.jpg

cXwrQQE.jpg

kQj3HVg.jpg

yQplk49.jpg

 

On 6/29/2018 at 12:56 AM, RICE RACING said:

I personally love IWG, its got merits in that there is reduction in internal volume and this always improves response it also has a smaller valve area so the anti phase capsule (if running one of the after market actuators) needs less effect as the TIP is not pushing as hard through simple P=F/A relationship.

Use Borg Warner matchbot, there you will see what size WG area you need, its not as large as some would have you believe too

On 6/29/2018 at 9:05 AM, HarrisRacing said:

IWG!

So simple. So much power. My 2.75L was 3600 rpm boost in 3rd from a 2k punch. Also made 740 whp at 30 psi tapering to 25 on top on E85. Car would trap 128 mph in 1/4 on pumpgas and 19 or so psi. Gained about 150 whp when going to E85 and high boost from there (sorry never got track numbers)

Been writing with Piggaz in PM (he is running a 2.8 vs my oversized 2.6), and he thinks the 0.92 is way to small. You have some good points, but fabricating the downpipe/WG-return won't be an issue, even if I like the simplicity with the integrated one. For now the 1.05 is ahead.

Did my homework on matchbot and I would get away with a 40mm unit even for low boost, no need for dual 60mm screamers :)

RICE: phase + anti phase capsule control? Like the attached image?

Untitled.png

On 6/30/2018 at 9:18 AM, RICE RACING said:

I know its a shit box rotary lol, but some may be interested in some of the set up analysis I do on matching, prior to going willy nilly on changing out turbo's + a raft of other things like main fuel table mapping etc.

On this application looked at the twin EFR7163 for my own use.

Hahah that looks pretty familiar.  I do very similar, before matchbot I just had an array of spreadsheets I used but MB does help/make me a little lazier than I used to be but handy because I don't have as much spare time as I used to so anything which makes it easier ftw.   It's kinda handy that it dumps all the working out so you can effectively map  turbine flow maps from other manufacturers out by adjusting the turbine expansion ratio and monitoring the turbine corrected flow, just making sure that you take into account the correction factors used for each.

 

28 minutes ago, K_arlstrom said:

Maybe it's like example 3 in this manual? (where I stole the other picture) 

He's effectively talking about how much leverage is applied to each side of the WG, you need an ECU which can control two separate boost control solenoids independantly.  One is for controlling how much "opening force" is applied to the gate, and the other for how much "closing force" is applied.    If you can apply the full boost pressure to holding the gate closed, and non of the boost pressure to opening it - then you in theory can go way past the sprung pressure... but being able to fine tune both sides means you should be able to limit erratic behaviour as you reach boost targets.

The closest to this you will achieve with the typical "single direction" boost control setups is using a 4-port boost control solenoid - the example you linked is slightly simpler again, "single direction" but with a 3 port solenoid which means you never have the option of applying full pressure exclusively to either side of the gate.

Edited by Lithium

https://www.rbracing-rsr.com/sq6m_wastegate.html

Similar to this, only not as homo :) I use all kinds of iterations of this system different valves etc, but essentially this describes how it mechanically hooks up in one version at least.

Superior boost control, no need for homo CO2 lol...... Works at sea level and as high as you can go (highest I test is famous mountain in Retardistan).

Customer cleaned up the look a bit by fitting different cam phase trigger set up and the OG Blue Tomei cover, looks nicer and better when the cam belt slaps around on the various limiters. Little video of the idle attached too, there is not much room in the engine bay! twins would be a lesbian to fit for sure....  EFR9180 still going too :P

B3U1LP1.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2igtYCKCdo&feature=youtu.be

On 6/28/2018 at 11:13 PM, VFRegal said:

For 7670 I think you would want sr with ve head. not so much det head in my opinion. Unless you are talking about drag racing.

Although I am not 100% on all the different mister bishi motors.

 

It's a street/time attack build mate.

Scotty actually wanted me to run an 8374....the 7670 was actually a small compromise.... in NO WAY will it be laggy.

Power will come on early and the car will be completely brutal at the limit. RB Killer? Yep. No issue to destroy anyone running -5's or less.

With the emtron I also have the option of running traction control....but I think itd be more scary/fun without it.

Once I finally find an RX7 the first thing I'd do is throw an 8374 1.45 on it..... & let that thing spin to the moon & back.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...