Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, defibf said:

I have used old fashioned cmos ic’s for this sort of thing CD4022B should get the job done, and no surface mount soldering required ??

I've had it suggested to me that a 74GC393 would do the trick, i'm just trying to get my head around if i need to do more than just give it 5v power, ground, the signal and then take the signal from the 3rd output and send that straight to the ECU, or if I need some other kind of input to it aswell?

 

edit: so it seems i need to give it a a 'reset input' (pin 2), would i be correc that that's just another 5v input?

7 hours ago, sneakey pete said:

I've had it suggested to me that a 74GC393 would do the trick, i'm just trying to get my head around if i need to do more than just give it 5v power, ground, the signal and then take the signal from the 3rd output and send that straight to the ECU, or if I need some other kind of input to it aswell?

 

edit: so it seems i need to give it a a 'reset input' (pin 2), would i be correc that that's just another 5v input?

Pretty sure that these will be ok with 15v supply 

data sheet 

http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/cd4017b

just off to work, i will have a check this evening ?

 

  

 

13 hours ago, defibf said:

Pretty sure that these will be ok with 15v supply 

data sheet 

http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/cd4017b

just off to work, i will have a check this evening ?

 

  

 

I looked through my box file of useful ccts, the ic i have used in the past as a divide by 8 device is below, this is the exact cct i used so I know that it works fine, excuse the fag packet drawing

i/p = r2

r1 = 12r

r2 = 100r

c1& c2 = 0.1 uF

D1 = zener bzx85c12

4040divideby8.jpeg

Edited by defibf
edited as i forgot i/p
  • Thanks 1

Time to unlock the 'high boost'  :)

Comparison to the RX7 below (both in 3rd gear) Evo had some traction issues though ! Got the response good now after lots of fundamental checking of the ideal cam advance on the MIVEK.

 

100-150 3rd.jpg

Another interim update of the performance relative to the 'big block' Datsun  :)

Sorting through a few items however got the same power and speed on lower boost today with some more tweaking, adjusting each cylinder to optimum... anyway here is previous days with slight miss fire *excuses!* will optimize some more. Just need to find some spare time to run at the test track and pump it up to 3600mB ;)

 

IMG_8032.thumb.jpg.b751e91c97b6b888bc1e5964898057b0.jpg

100-185 R34.jpg

100-185 EVO9.jpg

1 hour ago, burn4005 said:

Swap to some Denso IK01-24 or NGK R7434-8 plugs and you won't look back.

oh wait, are you still talking evo or RB?

EVO, old mate ran them at stock gap from what I can tell in picture though.

Current running for the nerds out there?

Bleed about 10% out wg, PR ~ 4.2:1 ~74lb/hour flow ~108k rpm 900 egt, TEP, TIP will keep to our selves see who can work it out lol...... Engine makes around 750bhp based off the performance listed, or around 14 million rwkw on lebtechomodynamics depending on tires + tie down methods + kebabs consumed

  • Haha 2

Just for anyone else interested in the new black series. Turbosource.com have them advertised and priced on their page in the US. They have said to me that the turbos are currently getting assembled and should be ready to ship end of February. The guys seemed relatively good to deal with and have some interesting stuff in the works for the RB and efr. Ill reserve the rest of my judgement until the turbo turns up. Maybe worth a look. anyway.

8474, 9274, 9280 have not started shipping yet.  I expect this will happen this week.

if anyone has a turbo already its a pre production unit, they have not started shipping as of right now

  • Like 1
5 hours ago, Full-Race Geoff said:

8474, 9274, 9280 have not started shipping yet.  I expect this will happen this week.

if anyone has a turbo already its a pre production unit, they have not started shipping as of right now

Ahh ok, didn't realise it was pre-production.   Still, sounds like it's close :)

11+ minutes on load on the EVO (66 x 10 second homo 'passes' LOL) on 19 hours and 50 minutes to go. We increased the performance even more, logs in next few days time permitting, maybe  even a video ;)

Overall the EFR9174IWG and complete kit from Full Race (thanks Geoff) is a great balance of response and power. Can run 'Full Race Boost' with no tappering to 9000rpm (up to ~40psi gauge pressure).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
×
×
  • Create New...