Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

May have to start a new thread regarding large HP and the way power is delivered, compared to say power figures around 250rwkw and how responsive it feels....

Although, as you say Joel :cheers:, 300rwkw rb30det feels faster than a 300rwkw rb25det...

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Im thinkin of gettin a TD06-19c, mattR had one and made 286rwkw on bp98 and 313rwkw with toulene.....

Decisions decisions.

Dont want to sound like a non believer, but that is great power out of a TD06-19C. Not doubting that figure, but doubt everyone usign that turbo would see that power output...what boost level and did the engine live of was it a case of good whille it lasted?

Dont shoot me, im just curious because i havent seen those figures out of the larger TD06-20g on RB25s

In a jap mag there is a 2.2ltr EVO8 that made 373rwkw using a HKS 3037ProS.

 

Sounds a little optimistic.

 

I'll try to get a scan of it. Its in jap writing but.

I'd like to see that !

:cheers:

What ever turbo you choose, the first factor is how much lbs/min the compressor is going to push out. Then probably turbine restrictions, be it in the (too small) exhaust housing or (std) exhaust manifold.

The 20G wheel is roughly the same size as a HKS 2835R wheel - max is ~45lbs/min so around 450 flywheel hp.

The 25G wheel is roughly the same as the HKS 3037S - max is ~55lbs/min so around 550 flywheel hp.

The 19C wheel is alot smaller than the 20G wheel and a very different design. Interesting quote on chassis dyno kw for this compressor.

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 year later...

enrico i was pulled over and defected the other week. the highway patrol went all over my car including the turbo which is HKS GTRS. I had no heat shield so the turbo was clearly visable, i told him it was all standard. He didnt have a clue and just got me for the rest of the stupid stuff...

Anyone had any bad experiances with t4/t3s on rb20s? or wat power they were able to make?

I've bought one with hks high mount manifold n gate n was just after a bit of advise.

Have a read through the "Top RB20 club, 260rwkw " thread as there is a lot of good info and results from various RB20 configurations.

As a comparison I have a T3/T4 hybrid type turbo with internal gate and make around 235rwkw at around 16psi which is seen just before 4,000rpm in 4th on a dyno.

Besides the turbo/manifold/gate what else do you have to complement it?

ive got a Wolf ecu 4 it, AVCR, 3" exhaust, front mount, bosh pump, 550 injectors n looking at some tomie cams. Wat do you think would be possible?

Prolly gettin parts fitted bout a month or two........hopefully!

Edited by drifted4door

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...