Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'ts built, and I understand that the previous owner had the head cleaned up. Seems to really like boost on E85. You can see on the graph that it is well and truly out of puff and starts dropping at that level however.

Also Castrol 10-60 here. Works well and is regularly on special for 50-60 bucks. The dude from mainlube recommended it to me and he does a LOT of filtergram tests. Said it was the best bank for buck oil on the market. Perhaps a little thick for some, but these engines get so hot, so quickly, I think its fine.

  • 1 month later...
On 10/27/2016 at 10:57 PM, RBN1 said:

My 32R runs -9's @20psi, stock airbox (good for mid to high 300's), RPM adj cam gears, stock cooler , powerFC, Tomei Expreme Dumps>Racepace 3.5 full exhaust, nismo afms and 600cc injectors on 98 @336rwkw. (all Racepace built & tuned - they run Castrol edge 10w60 in it). Everythings well within limits with the current setup on track days, motorkhanas and hillclimbs. No need to get a aftermarket intercooler or pods. ECU choice, depends on who is going to tune your car. 

I've owned the car for 11 years now and when Racepace sorted it out a few years ago, it's interesting how much they changed back to OEM (as apposed to how much was swapped out for aftermarket)

Hi RBN1, I also have a pair of -9's ready to go in along with Tomei cam gears.  However, I am undecided on Tomei dumps, do you know if they help with high end or low end power?  Do you know what was your injector duty cycle when putting down 336rwkw?

 

11 minutes ago, TXSquirrel said:

Hi RBN1, I also have a pair of -9's ready to go in along with Tomei cam gears.  However, I am undecided on Tomei dumps, do you know if they help with high end or low end power?  Do you know what was your injector duty cycle when putting down 336rwkw?

 

Hi mate,

I got the Tomei Expreme dumps for cheap (brand new) at the time. Most people go the HPI's over the Tomei's although at these power levels (<400rwkw), I don't think it makes much difference at all - RPM weren't too fussed about which ones I chose for my build and said the Tomei's were fine. If they do make a diff at this power level it'd be top end, i've yet to see someone do a comparison between stock dumps and aftermarket at this power level.

Can't remember what cycle but pretty sure they're >80% on 98. They're capable of around 360-380rwkw on 98 from what i've seen on other cars with similar setup to mine but -5's. I'll check and re-post re. cycle when my car goes back in for a checkup tune in the next month.

My goal is only to break 300kw with -9's, so I never considered aftermarket dumps.  But since my engine will be pulled, I am feeling a bit of "may as well..."  

For a low power goal like mine, will aftermarket dumps make any difference?  How about ported manifolds?  Does that really create lag at the low end like OP suggested?

 

4 hours ago, TXSquirrel said:

My goal is only to break 300kw with -9's, so I never considered aftermarket dumps.  But since my engine will be pulled, I am feeling a bit of "may as well..."  

For a low power goal like mine, will aftermarket dumps make any difference?  How about ported manifolds?  Does that really create lag at the low end like OP suggested?

 

if you are pulling the engine out, definitely do the dumps. port the manifolds, get good quality gaskets. do as much as possible. removing the turbos with the engine out takes about 10 minutes. removing the turbos with the engine in takes about 10 hours lol

15 hours ago, Hadouken said:

If I'm not mistaken 32 dumps are restrictive. It's 33/34 dumps that you want.


You would be mistaken, as the 34 dumps are the smallest of the three dumps. I wouldn't be buying bigger dumps for a 300kw goal, I wouldn't port the manifolds either. 

12 minutes ago, Borci88 said:


You would be mistaken, as the 34 dumps are the smallest of the three dumps. I wouldn't be buying bigger dumps for a 300kw goal, I wouldn't port the manifolds either. 

Not sure if serious... or taking the piss :/.

  • Like 1
3 minutes ago, Borci88 said:


And make 320kw with standard dumps, or make 320kw with HPI dumps? 

hpi dumps. get those gases out faster. might as well upgrade stuff while its apart. not exactly easy working with those twins while engine is in the car.

Actually brain fart, I thought about it for 2 seconds and went YEAH THATS RIGHT. 33 bigger than 32.. but I'm still sure 34's are more restrictive than 33, but not enough to matter.


Still incorrect. This is well documented so I don't know where you are getting your information from.

32 is restrictive. The end. 33 and 34 dumps are verrrrrrry similar.
2 hours ago, Hadouken said:

 


Still incorrect. This is well documented so I don't know where you are getting your information from.

32 is restrictive. The end. 33 and 34 dumps are verrrrrrry similar.

 


Did you even read what I wrote? I said 33 is bigger than 32, thus that suggests that I'm meaning that the 32 is the restrictive one (notice I played on that in the first sentence?).
34 is definitely smaller than 33 dumps, "but not enough to matter". So you essentially said I'm incorrect while agreeing with what I said. 

9 minutes ago, Hadouken said:

34 dumps flow more than 33. This is fact. And originally you said 32 dumps were better than 34. So yes I clearly read what you are saying.

Thank you

Where is this a fact exactly? I changed my statement as I remembered the wrong dump. Everything that we've done on the dyno points to 32 being the most restrictive, while 33 being the best for flow, and 34 trailing ever so slightly behind it, but only marginal. How much testing have you done?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
    • One year is a bit concerning. Did you try contacting GSP? It says 5 year warranty on the box if I remember correctly. I'm also running their driveshafts on my S2 Stagea.   You could check the part numbers on Amayama for your year. Here's the link for my 1998 which gives the 39100-23U60 part number. Well, that and 39100-23U70. https://www.amayama.com/en/genuine-catalogs/epc/nissan-japan/stagea/wgnc34/6649-rb25det/trans/391 What does it say for yours?
    • I ordered a GSP Front R/H Axle from here - https://justjap.com/products/gsp-premium-front-driveshaft-r-h-nissan-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-stagea-4wd#description It lasted around a year before one of the boots blew out. I'm lowered, but I have GKTech roll center adjusters. One year seems a little premature. I think I'm going to spend the extra money on an OEM cv axle this time. This website - https://tfaspeed.com/collections/nissan-stagea-wgnc34-x-four-parts/products/nissan-stagea-awc34-260rs-rb26-right-front-axle-drive-assembly Makes it sound like the readily available OEM CV axle will only fit 11.1999 Stagea and up (mine is a 2.1997 S1). The JustJap listing didn't mention any years or anything for the GSP axle. Amayama shows '11.1999' and up as well for that part number. As well as 'plastic boot type'. See attached picture. So I guess my question is, does that axle (39100-23U60) really only fit S2 Stagea? It's the front driver side. If it does, I'd love to buy that instead of rolling the dice on another GSP. I've found that OEM one cheaper here: https://www.partsfornissans.com/oem-parts/nismo-jdm-r32-r33-r34-skyline-gtr-r32-gts4-right-front-axle-3910023u60 and here https://www.nissanparts.cc/oem-parts/nismo-shaft-ft-drive-3910023u60 Just a little confused because the JapSpeed listing for the GSP front driver axle doesn't mention any specific years or anything and it fit my S1 Stagea fine. So will 39100-23U60 fit my S1 Stagea even though technically it says '11.1999' and up? What would have changed? Thanks.  
    • Thanks for the info. The only "Issue" I've had with the shifter is I always found the throw between 4th and 6th gear too close. I'm always worried to shift into 4th accidently and sending my motor to the moon. Adam LZ recently came out with a video and stated Serialnine revised their shifters to correct this and will change all the revised parts for 150$. Strangely enough, I contacted Serialnine right after and they denied it and said it's bullshit. I found that strange as he's a distributer. I'll keep this forum post updated on that saga.
    • Yep that is correct. It allows you to adjust the short throw range from what I can tell
×
×
  • Create New...