Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 26/04/2025 at 10:14 AM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

the last time I went there were too many numpties on the cruise sessions. Nearly caused a few accidents holding up people and a few guys initiating massive kerb to kerb drifts with heaps of cars right behind them. Not to mention, there were guys on the track session using it as a power cruise session.

Hmpf, that doesn't sound great. That makes it feel like it might be better to put the money towards a track day instead. It didn't seem that bad the two years before.

 

On 26/04/2025 at 9:53 AM, The Bogan said:

Is there an actual website thingie for peoples who don't have Facebooks?

As Brett mentioned it'll be on the roll racing website. Sale starts 6pm on Wednesday. Tickets may sell out quickly so if you want to go, set an alarm and get them at that time :)

1 hour ago, soviet_merlin said:

Hmpf, that doesn't sound great. That makes it feel like it might be better to put the money towards a track day instead. It didn't seem that bad the two years before.

 

As Brett mentioned it'll be on the roll racing website. Sale starts 6pm on Wednesday. Tickets may sell out quickly so if you want to go, set an alarm and get them at that time :)

All I want to do is be a spectator and check out the cars in the show and shine

23 minutes ago, The Bogan said:

All I want to do is be a spectator and check out the cars in the show and shine

Oh, right. In that case there is no rush. It's the car entries that are quite limited and can sell out quickly.

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, soviet_merlin said:

That makes it feel like it might be better to put the money towards a track day instead

That's correct, suits my requirements a bit better.

Sure there are also numpties there, however it's generally a different vibe and more my kind of vibe.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Great read about manifold design, twin scroll with the division all the way to the wastegate seat/fire ring 

https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1088497013319763&id=100064784224104

This is why I bought a Sinco manifold for my shit box and not a 6Boost due to wastegate design.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, r32-25t said:

Or just do it properly and get a manifold with 2 gates 

how is a manifold with the pulses split all the way to the gate seat any different?

Same outcome.

Just need to remember how lazy exhaust gasses are, it's travelled down the runners, into the collector and up through a divided wastegate path, even if it's not a 100% divided seal at the wastegate piston/valve, it's not going to travel all the way up, down, then back into the opposing cylinders.

Anyhow, each to their own, nothing wrong with twin wastegates. I just prefer 1x huge one.

3 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Just need to remember how lazy exhaust gasses are, it's travelled down the runners, into the collector and up through a divided wastegate path, even if it's not a 100% divided seal at the wastegate piston/valve, it's not going to travel all the way up, down, then back into the opposing cylinders.

Anyhow, each to their own, nothing wrong with twin wastegates. I just prefer 1x huge one.

Actually, that's what that post is saying is happening, with only the LAST 10mm to the wastegate flange not divided.
A whole single centimetre is what they're claiming caused that change.
However, I haven't actually punched the numbers in etc to do any mafs, but they're talking 26PSi + of boost, and it taking nearly 2 seconds longer to climb a further 200rpm... Yep, it was in 4th gear, but, say that car does 2800RPM at 100km/h, they're talking a car making 26PSi, is taking an additional nearly 2 seconds to go from 128km/h, to 135km/h... That's pretty extreme to me.
Also interesting as you scroll down through the comments and I started reading there was someone who's done very similar testing, on a hub dyno, back to back without even pulling car off the hub dyno, and barely saw any change what so ever on a stupid powered car.

I was more referring to Brett's 100% fit comment, where there isn't a perfect seal between the wastegate piston/valve.

I do not believe at that point there would be a discernible difference in spool/engine efficiency.

Where as the usual 6Boost style of "twin scroll" which doesn't divide the pulses to the wastegate versus something like a Sinco twin scroll, which is split all the way to the wastegate piston/valve, you'll definitely see a difference.

1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I was more referring to Brett's 100% fit comment, where there isn't a perfect seal between the wastegate piston/valve.

I do not believe at that point there would be a discernible difference in spool/engine efficiency.

Where as the usual 6Boost style of "twin scroll" which doesn't divide the pulses to the wastegate versus something like a Sinco twin scroll, which is split all the way to the wastegate piston/valve, you'll definitely see a difference.

I guess the question becomes, if 10mm gives 1.7 seconds of spool difference, what does 1mm give?

Because you'll need a gap. Even if you're the world's best fabricator and can get that fitment PERFECT, you have two metal surfaces about to heat up and expand. So you need to leave a gap. Realistically, they're likely to leave a couple of mm for most fabricators, so how bad is 5mm compared to 10mm? Or more so, how much worse is 5mm vs twin gated?

But then, if it merging before the gate is bad and hurts spool, I wonder, what would happen if you keep both gates completely separated in their own exhaust systems too?

Would there be any benefit anywhere to keeping them fully split?

Would there be a benefit like with an NA V engine at running an X pipe or a H pipe?

35 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

what does 1mm give?

My guess? Almost perfect separation. The pressure pulses would bleed across, but because they have to squeeze through the gap, they will be substantially attenuated.

35 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

I wonder, what would happen if you keep both gates completely separated in their own exhaust systems too?

Would there be any benefit anywhere to keeping them fully split?

Given most twin gates are plumbed back to atmosphere..... I would say that experiment is well understood. But in reality, it would make no difference to spool at all, if they are 2 completely separated gates. What happens downstrema of them will not affect spool at all.

 

  • Like 1
11 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

My guess? Almost perfect separation. The pressure pulses would bleed across, but because they have to squeeze through the gap, they will be substantially attenuated.

Given most twin gates are plumbed back to atmosphere..... I would say that experiment is well understood. But in reality, it would make no difference to spool at all, if they are 2 completely separated gates. What happens downstrema of them will not affect spool at all.

 

I'm thinking beyond spool. The claim in this alone shows evidence for spool only. But spool is one thing, what about the rest of our power band?

And if we say 1mm is negligible, what is the relationship like for the gap? Is it linear? Exponential? Linear to a point and then it just doesn't matter anymore and stops getting worse?

These are just all the questions... I don't know the answers definitively either.

I'm going with "Just run two gates". Fix the problem conclusively. It's the only way you'd ever truly know, right?.

This is all pretty much splitting hairs. Even the extreme example where it takes two whole seconds at 100kmh or something sounds monstrously dubious.

And anyway, when you're punching the throttle when you 'need' this power, you aren't at 2800rpm in the wrong gear. Test it at 5600rpm in 3rd gear, when you're traction limited punching out of a sweeper. Much difference there when you account for traction?

1 hour ago, Kinkstaah said:

when you're punching the throttle when you 'need' this power, you aren't at 2800rpm in the wrong gear.

Actually, I'd argue that that is exactly when having the wastegate/scroll isolation correct would show the most benefit.

  • Like 1

In other news, my shit box R33 is Gregged.

I kid you not, 3 months ago it drove perfectly fine, parked it and it sat on the trickle charger for about 2.5 months. A few weeks ago, noticed the charger stopped working. 

Oh wells, 15 years out of a CTEK charger, across 3x shit box JDMs (and other dailies) you've done well.

Went to try start the car today, nothing. Thought, yeah ok, let's get the jumper leads on.

This is where shit escalated lol... Initially popped on the leads and noticed a great deal of sparks, not to worry. Let's triple check shit and try again, yep same. Thought perhaps was just an initial current draw from the 2x audio amplifiers, etc. nope, leads got warm and the fuse box jump point started to GLOW! 🥲 

Luckily the Tiguan wasn't on, I can't imagine what Christmas lights combination would have appeared on the dash if the motor was running.

Anyhow, hastily gave up and messaged Brett for a laugh, or commiserate whatever you want to call it.

Skyline (Shitbox) Lyfe 😂

PXL_20250507_030931026.thumb.jpg.8b50526faff3f9b3de531f6d55dcdc1e.jpg

  • Sad 1
34 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Test actual voltage on battery. It's probably way low and possibly got a shorted cell. Something that might explain everything in your report.

Oh, I thought of that too... I disconnected the battery and hooked up the leads direct to the car without the battery in place.

Sparks...

I suspect the following:

  • Alternator has decided to kill itself
  • Starter has decided to kill itself

I'll recharge the battery, then unplug both, and go from there.

The above might take 6 months - however I did buy a Victron 15 AMP trickle charger, apparently it's better than CTEK? Amazon, delivery by tonight.

https://www.amazon.com.au/Victron-Battery-Charger-15-Amp-waterproof/dp/B07P4LMMMD?ref_=ast_sto_dp

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, nothing formal, just open track days. Mostly small and tight circuits but I would like to get back out to Eastern Creek at some stage.
    • What type of track driving will you be doing?  Do you have a set of class rules you need to abide by that will limit your rim / tyre width?
    • I've been reading a lot lately about unsprung weight and how beneficial it can be to reduce it for driving on the track, given my semi's only have another day or two in them I am throwing around the idea of some lighter wheels and a square set up. I have 265/35/19's and 245/40(?)/19 Federal 595's at the moment. The wheels and tyres are super heavy. I looked up my wheel weight online and got 14.5kg naked. Not sure if this was 8.5 (front) or 9 (rear) but that's a lot. I have also been reading about the benefits of a square setup. Much better rotation and potentially less understeer.  When I throw these together I'm thinking about a 17x9 or 18x9 square (preferably under 10kgs per wheel) with 245 or 255's. I can get some cheap 17x8.5 BMW M Sport wheels, they weight 10.5 kg's each but at 8.5 wide could probably only get 245's on them? I know they come with 255's from factory but semi's are a bit chunkier. Otherwise it will be aftermarket wheels in a 9" width. Most of the other BMW wheels are heavy unless you pay a squillion dollars for some M wheels.  Although, the E46 M3 Style 67's could be good but I'd have to buy 2 sets to square them up.  My car has a tickle over 400hp and about to put an LSD in also, is 245 a little thin for a square setup? It kinda feels that way to me. Also, is there any tangible benefit to having 18's over 17's? Is the footprint demonstrably bigger? From those of you who went to light(er) wheels after heavy buggers, did you notice it much?
    • Start with the R32 GTR wiring diagram. The ECU is essentially the same, so the pinouts are good. The details around ECCS relays, etc might differ a little bit, but the reality is that you need to get ignition power to kick the ECU so it powers up the ECCS relay which brings the rest of the ECU up. This also gives power to the other circuits that are needed to make the engine run, like the ignition coils, etc. All of this is visible on the R32 diagram and should give you a strong guide, even if it's not quite the same as the R33. As to specifics - I'm pretty sure no-one can help you from afar, as there is no way to know what mistake or omission has been made in connecting stuff up. It always turns out to be "LOL, I shorted something and an entire wire vanished out of the loom", or "We never connected X or Y main connector", or "shit, you mean I need to have that fuse installed?".
    • hello wanted some insight on what my problem could be so i swapped a RB26DETT into my r33 gtst used a R33 GTR engine harness and im using a haltech platinum pro. The car cranks but no start the ecu isn’t getting any power now im trying to find out why i cant seem to find any schematics  or diagram for the engine harness for the r33 gtr anything helps thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...