Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Offset subframes issue.....anyone got a cure

I've got the same problem that a lot of the S-Chassis and R-Chassis suffer from, the subframes on my R32 GT-R cause the wheels to fill the guards differently. I have the left rear wheel sticking out further and the right front wheel out further......it looks odd!

i have searched and read everything on the site and there are quite a few people who have the same problem but no one seems to have a cure.

i have talked to a few Nissan and alignment specialist and it is quite when you run big offset wheels.

Does anyone make an offset subframe bush set for the rear? What about the front.....slot the subframe and machine some inserts? Whiteline make some offset bushes to adjust on the caster and top front camber arms, what about using the offset metal inserts in these with some custom urathane bushes?

Any thoughts?

yes adjustable lower control arms, and adj camber/traction arms. Set it exactly how you want to the mm, and get a better wheel alignment too.

Anything else I can help you with :P

Is there an actual misalignment problem or does it just look like it? If there is an actual problem then how much by? A good laser aligner will show this which tells you how much change is needed. From then on it's just a matter of making the appropriate changes, I had some vague idea that eccentric subframe mounting bushes were available.

  • Like 1
38 minutes ago, 260DET said:

Is there an actual misalignment problem or does it just look like it? If there is an actual problem then how much by? A good laser aligner will show this which tells you how much change is needed. From then on it's just a matter of making the appropriate changes, I had some vague idea that eccentric subframe mounting bushes were available.

A lot of S14/R33 era cars had the subframe a good 10-15mm to one side.  It's real.

  • Like 1

 

8 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

A lot of S14/R33 era cars had the subframe a good 10-15mm to one side.  It's real.

Up  to 15mm? That's a warranty issue surely although it may be just a bit late for that. The local excellent aligner reckons up to 3mm is common, that's on any car.

When they're up on tippie toes with skinny arse stock wheels, you can;t really notice.  When you drop them and try to fill the guards is when you notice it.  It may have been for a reason, but everyone is buggered if they can come up with a good one!

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

You can buy SPOON Rigid Collars from here...

http://www.rigidcollar.com.au/HOME.html

 

I just bought the rear set and will be putting them in when I have a chance as I noticed my rear wheels are to the left by about 3-4mm.

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

That's not really a solution to this problem though.  That's just solid bushes that are probably still concentric.  To move the subframe one way or the other to change its centering relative to the body, you need eccentric bushes/collars/whatever.

I have the exact same issue as you.. Read up on what these things actually do and how they fix the problem.. The holes where the bolts from the chassis go through the subframe have become larger over time which enables this to happen..

http://www.speedhunters.com/2011/06/car_life_gt_gt_fitting_rigid_collars_to_the_gt_r/

1 hour ago, GRKGTR said:

I have the exact same issue as you.. Read up on what these things actually do and how they fix the problem.. The holes where the bolts from the chassis go through the subframe have become larger over time which enables this to happen..

http://www.speedhunters.com/2011/06/car_life_gt_gt_fitting_rigid_collars_to_the_gt_r/

The holes in the sub frame do not become larger over time, they are drilled larger from factory to help with the assembly process. These are cars that are built on an assembly line, not hand built like a Bugatti Veyron or a Ferrari 458, Nissan gives zero f**ks for a something that is out up to 5mm (case in point the rear of the car being offset in one direction) all they care about is how cheaply they can make something.

With the rear of the car the diameter of the pin that holds the sub frame are 20mm and the holes drilled in the sub frame bushes are 21.4mm. How is the spoon kit going to push the sub frame 5-10 mm to one side?

I did have a laugh at Mr speedhunters article, this quote was one of the best

This picture perfectly shows the problem the Rigid Collars address. You can see how the subframe has moved around and the bolt is far from centered, not to mention the offset bolt marks left on the subframe.

If the sub frame was moving around there would be paint off everywhere around the nut, the sub frame was bolted up that way from factory and hasn't moved since, it looks like that was the first time is has been undone since new. Another thing that i found weird is why didn’t he post a picture of the nuts done up once the collars were installed to show the difference they made?

9 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

The little bit of slop available from the OEM tolerance is not enough to explain the 10-15mm offset that you see in many R33s though.

This guy gets it.

  • Like 1

I had this issue, fitted some lower offset rims to my R32 GTR and immediately noticed that one side stuck out further than the other. Dropped the subframe out, replaced with solid alloy mounts which fixed it to some degree. Then installed adjustable lower LCAs which really only needed a couple of mm adjustment on one side, now got it looking sweet. It's a pain to fix but you can get it done if you're that anal, like me.

  • Like 1

I was always under the impression that "offset" issue was caused by flogged out OEM subframe bushes. 

I removed and replaced my subframe bushes with Hardrace ones and don't really have the said issue. Running 255 semis  (which stick out even more than normal tyres) with 17x9+30 wheels they have equal amounts of space each side.

Even when I had 18x9+20 BBS wheels with 265 tyres they were spaced equally. 

On 20/01/2017 at 2:13 PM, niZmO_Man said:

I don't read Speedhunters for their articles <insert something about playboy magazines>. They've proven themselves not to be that knowledgeable and have some 'product placement' in it as well.

Yep.. like how a set of Tomei ARMS turbos were installed for "response". LOL x 100000

  • Like 3
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...