Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Your opinion, more boost or not? RB25DET GTX3076R

G'day guys, I'm after your opinion or anyone that has a similar setup to my car.

Car is a 1998 R33 GTS25T

Current mods

Stock bottom RB25det, compression 150 - 160 across all 6.
Stock head gasket
ARP head studs
upgraded valve springs
camtech 272 9mm cams
Haltech plat pro
wideband kit
3 bar map sensor
6boost t3 twin scroll manifold
garrett gtx3076r .83 twin scroll, 50mm external gate
Walbro 460 e85 intank fuel pump

Currently making 
336rwkw @ 19psi low boost
360rwkw @ 25psi high boost
United E85 fuel

Before i go and speak to my tuner i wanted to ask you guys....
Has anyone thrown in more boost with a similar setup? Should i leave it where it is? looking at turning it up to 28-29psi to hopefully crack 400rwkw or close to.

Cheers.



 

360rwkw sounds pretty good but more may be possible. I would just ask the tuner to keep increasing boost until 

1. EGTs get too high or

2. detonation approaches or

3. It stops making more power.

 

 

I've had that setup on a RB28. Yes it can make 400 at that boost.

Just leave it as it is, man. It won't really make the car any faster in 97.7% of scenarios. Why tempt fate? I'd go as far to say as leave it on 19psi with a stock gasket. Twin scroll housings and manifold should make it a pretty potent setup.

Source: Tempted fate.

  • Like 2

Well to put it into perspective, you gained an extra 24kw by bumping it up an extra 6psi. You now want to make it crack 400kw, an extra 40kw by only going up another 4-5psi. 

Logically that ain't gonna happen if the tune was done well in the first place. Can always give it a go and it might happen, but I think its optimistic.

  • Like 1

I wouldn't be going past 25psi, typically stock rings are not meant for such high cylinder pressures. Especially in an engine known to have ring land issues In theory you would no want the rings to touch and compress on one another. I'd be looking at other items rather than boost pressure to hit 500hp.

 

In my RB20 this year I did about 12 runs in a weekend at our local strip. I was upping boost constantly and ran a 10.67 twice with 25psi @ 131mph and 27psi @ 133mph (Different 60 foots). I then proceeded to run 29psi and 30psi. The engine still works "fine" and is fully standard stock internals, however it has a fair amount of blow by and I suspect piston failure due to cylinder pressures. 

Thanks for your input guys. Another question for you...........

Closed loop vs open loop boost control

Since i use a haltech platinum pro ECU, is it better to control the boost pressure going through this ECU instead of using a EBC? Currently running off a Greddy ProfecB Spec II, which in my opinion doesn't feel like it is setup properly. What is better?

Cheers.

Wow that look's great. Right i knew this was the right way to go when i got the work done. So correct me if i'm wrong, If im using a EBC such as the profecB II. What is the use of the 3 bar map sensor i purchased with the Haltech ECU? Is it only used if i run the boost through the haltech?

Actually, the Profec has a MAC valve and the ECU could just as easily control that as any other.

OP.  The Profec has its own MAP sensor built in, which is how it knows what the manifold pressure is.  Not that it matters, because these boost controllers ARE NOT CLOSED LOOP.  They do not try to keep the boost in the plenum at a fixed value.  They just run the bleed valve at a pulsed duty cycle that is fixed when you set it up and for all time afterwards.  The boost measured by the Profec is just displayed on the front of it so you know how much you're running and so you can set it up.

If you use the ECU for boost control, then the ECU knows what the manifold pressure is from the 3 bar sensor you connected to it. 

Edited by GTSBoy
  • Like 1

Add more boost.. ring lands won't blow if you limit torque. Also spray more fuel at peak torque to keep the cylinder temperatures down and pump in more timing as torque decays..

I think the excess cylinder temps cause the rings to expand then smash the ring lands not so much the pressure/force.

Because you even hear of people smashing ring lands with cars making 250kW.

To put things into perspective, I've been thrashing the shit out of my car with about 1.8bar through the motor on the track and it's yet to go boom LOL... but like I said, I run very low timing at peak torque and spray heaps of fuel to the point it is about to misfire... but, the car is happy and the only thing that has died is the stock 300 000km head gasket and the turbo's arse end exploding.

  • Like 2

Thanks guys for all the info! ...  Has anyone had any experience controlling boost through a Haltech platinum pro ecu? Is boost more responsive & steady this way instead of using a EBC? I'm reading on other forums that haltech's inbuilt boost control is somewhat not accurate or tends to spike/overboost...

2 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Add more boost.. ring lands won't blow if you limit torque. Also spray more fuel at peak torque to keep the cylinder temperatures down and pump in more timing as torque decays..

I think the excess cylinder temps cause the rings to expand then smash the ring lands not so much the pressure/force.

Because you even hear of people smashing ring lands with cars making 250kW.

To put things into perspective, I've been thrashing the shit out of my car with about 1.8bar through the motor on the track and it's yet to go boom LOL... but like I said, I run very low timing at peak torque and spray heaps of fuel to the point it is about to misfire... but, the car is happy and the only thing that has died is the stock 300 000km head gasket and the turbo's arse end exploding.

Good point, progressive timing and rich fuel definitely helped my RB stay together for as long as it has. Heat is definitely the culprit in ring compression / failure, but the quickest way to heat is often cylinder pressure ( Boost, compression, nitrous, etc.) assuming everything else is fine?

More Air = More Fuel = More Pressure = More Heat, I think i'd be right in saying that.

1.8bar would be relative to the amount of flow, what turbo are you running?

I'm running  (well was) the Hypergear SS2 with the ceramic BB centre, happen to be a prototype turbo too lol.. probably why it exploded when I ran stupid amounts of boost through it. The funny thing was it kept making power, so I kept adding boost.

You can control boost via the Halaltech very well if you've setup the base duty vs. boost target table correctly then enable the closed loop. I've done this on 2x cars already and boost control is fantastic. Of course there are a few tricks but a decent tuner should know what to do in terms of boost oscillation etc. but that costs dyno time, which workshops cbf spending time on.

+1 re: Haltech boost control (and Johnny's settings).

Really does work pretty damn well, unless you do weird shit like have an auto with a gate after the turbine wheel and load it up a hill. But that isn't Haltech's fault and it works really damn well, though I would wager most modern ECU's will. To be fair, I'd also say a standalone EBC can be setup to work just as well when you think about it, you shouldn't need to swap ECU's merely for the sake of boost control unless you want fancy things like Boost by gear, or Boost by XYZ variable that the EBC cannot provide.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...