Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Need some ideas.

 

R34 GTR.

 

Car had 354rwkw with -9s at 24psi on e85. N1 manifolds, full 3.5 exhaust with no cat.

 

Added 4bar sensor and kelford L182-A 264 cams and BC springs.

 

Car is making less power than before and is laggier to make boost everywhere.

 

345rwkw or so on 19psi and will not make anymore boost, solenoid is max duty. I knew max boost would come down but not that much.

 

Spikes to 25psi midrange but once the engine starts to breath it just falls away.

 

Have tried lots of adjustment of cam timing, bench test wastegate actuators, and checked all the connections.

 

I'm gonna go over and boost leak test it with him again and I considered bypassing BOVs for testing. I'm also going to remove intakes and inspect Comp wheels and free play.

 

Given I'm sure I could hear a new turbo bearing/whistle type sound when it comes on boost, is this symptomatic of failing turbo bearing?

 

The car had 2 boost leaks previously and I did a track day not knowing it had those leaks, worried I've cooked a turbo bearing?

 

Other ideas welcome.

 

Yes I know I should have put a single on it.

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/470243-lack-of-powerlack-of-boost-rb26/
Share on other sites

Yes it idles perfectly as I also suspected that maybe the timing had been thrown out. He said it is revving cleanly it is just a boost issue.

 

And if you remember from my build thread I was chasing a boost leak and that whistling sound before the cams went in.

 

Would stuffed blow off valves have this kind of effect? Or does the vented pressure just end up back in the intake anyway and have no bearing on Max boost?

 

 

If it's an oil seal yeah I guess?

I'm talking more about bearing wear/pending failure.

I can hear a whistle/whirring that wasn't there previously.

Sounds like the whistle a turbo diesel 4wd makes as they spool.

They only had 7k on them when purchased and play was fine then, they have only done another 1000ks since.

 

I will check them again tomorrow.

 

My thought was that running a track day with a boost leak may have had them working too hard and caused an issue.

 

What would I see from faulty BOVs?

 

 

Test for boost leaks by blocking off the pipe (do you have 2 into 1?) and installing a tyre valve. Apply pressure - first up to 30 psi and then 40 psi and you will see if there is a leak. What kind of wastegate and what spring are you using?

Do you mean testing the BOVs?

All piping to an from BOVs is factory.

These are standard garret actuators that come on -9s so I think they are 1bar.

They were both bench tested fine.

If the BOVs were leaking I would've thought it wouldn't make 25psi in the midrange?


Dose Pipe suggested actuators. 

I think they are the standard 15.6psi ones that ship with those turbos. Tuner bench tested them, they both crack at 17psi, is that too early for a target boost of 24ish? 

They "were" working fine.

This was them at purchase, those are the actuators. 

I will test BOVs, actuators preload, and shaft play tomorrow. 

Anything else? 
 

received_10153163034151771.jpeg

My suggestion for pressure testing was for the whole induction system - not just the bovs - also the piping, intercooler - all the connectors.

I take it your boost control is by an aftermarket ECU and Mac valve. When you say the solenoid is at max duty - that should mean fully closed so no boost should be getting to the actuators...are you sure you have that right? I forgot you were using IWG. Maybe you need some heavier duty actuators such as the HKS ones.

I had pressure tested the entire intake previously when chasing boost leaks, up to 40psi. Will do it again to be sure.

 

One thing a static test doesn't show is BOV leakage as anything going past is still in the same pipework, I'm just not sure what the symptoms are with faulty BOVs when the leak is past the seat and recirculating back into the intake.

 

Haltech with 4bar sensor and Mac solenoid.

 

If need be I'll wire the actuator flap shut to test it.

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...